we were looking for john marshall harlan and john marshall harlan ii.from 1911, the second is his grandson and he served to 1971. try alka-seltzer. it kills heartburn fast. yeehaw! >>> okay. indomitable -- >> paul ryan. >> paul ryan? uh, creative. >> nikki haley? >> energetic. >> donald trump? >> huge. >> huge. >> rick santorum? >> press secretary. >> all right. i have no idea what he meant. he was asked to give one-word answers. press secretary. >> former press secretary, that's like an insult. >> is that an insult? >> i think it had to be a little bit of a jab at santorum. >> a tiny pit. paul ryan, hesitated there. >> later he said he could see santorum as his running mate. fagan will be running mate with mitt romney before -- >> i thought it was interesting because he seemed to defend santorum a little more than normal. he didn't pile on. >> this is romney trying to secure the base, trying to be the leader of the party and bring everybody together. >> shameless plug. >> go kansas in the final four. >> all right. that's a good one. jamal? >> tomorrow

i think the best guidance that i came across was, um, a wonderful opinion by justice john marshall harlan in the 1970s. he said the question can't be how much privacy do people subjectively expect, it has to be how much privacy must citizens normatively demand to have security in their liberty in a free society? and that's a hard question. judges are uncomfortable deciding how much minimal privacy we need to be free and spontaneous and creative and not constantly looking over our shoulders. but i think that's a question that can't turn on expectations, it's just going to have to be at some point confronted. >> it's not just the aspect of pryce when we're out in -- privacy when we're out in public, but their capacity to peer into us now. it's not just geolocational. but i'm thinking now of the both positive and downside of, say, dna testing and the bloody brick case out of england which, and the spillover effects of dna testing. on the one hand, we know and celebrate the capacity to release people who are wrongly convicted, but what about those who are wrongly cast a shadow over by, you kn