all of which beggedthe question, could anybody take seriously anything john mcafee says? . if mcafee claims his innocence, why did he disappear and make a circus of this whole thing? i don't understand it. and i just wish someone would investigate it, or find someone who can talk about it, and bring some justice, somewhere. >> but faull's family wasn't holding their breath waiting for justice. >> it almost feels hopeless because, you know, it's a foreign country, and i don't know how to handle it. >> you getting any answers or any contact from them? >> no, not anything from them at all. >> in 2013, the family filed a wrongful death suit against john mcafee. after the millionaire failed to respond to their claims, a federal judge deemed him to be in default, and ordered mcafee to pay faull's estate more than $25 million. in response, mcafee issued a statement insisting he was never charged with greg faull's murder, he also claimed he had no assets, so he was unable to pay even a penny of the judgement against him. and he wouldn't be paying another nemesis either, the irs. f

strategic wealth partners ceo mark tepper portman square group mike baker in the right stuff found her john mcafeeing to maria is live right now. ♪. maria: it is time for the hot topic of the hour president biden speaking out about the impeachment inquiry with the fundraiser in virginia last night the president said i focused on the things that the american people watch me focus on. the best i can tell they want to impeach me because they want to shut down the government, mike baker your reaction. i try to connect the dots. >> that is the problem whether it is that statement or the speech from annoyed he just made, there is logic and things that he says and often times is whatever is opposite of coh coherent. there is no self-awareness in washington, d.c. and sometimes that is trouble sides of the aisle for democrats adam schiff and some of the others to stand around and say this is nothing but a political witch-hunt there is no sense of irony and what they say after the years that they spent with the russia collusion story that had no basis, no evidence even though adam schiff said we have the ev

judge scott mcafee said the move is of an absolute necessity due to the wide scope and logistics of holding a, quote, maga trial. joining me now, msnbc legal analyst and civil rights attorney, johnmitchell. thank you both for coming back to the saturday show. charles, what would the narrow gag order entail? what are your expectations that donald trump will actually comply? >> jonathan, i think that jackson's office has done a really good job in their request to make sure that they are only asking about people who necessarily would not be donald trump political opponents. the significance there is it is not infringing upon its first amendment rights as a candidate for the united states office a president. he is talking about potential witnesses. he is talking about potential court personnel and other people like lawyers. folks who should not be in the public eye to begin with. he is also trying to keep the jury pool from being tainted. all of those things are to ensure that both he and donald trump get the fair and impartial trial which they are constitutionally entitled to. he's asking the court, essentially, to protect the proceedings from donald trump's big mouth and not getti