defend john mccain or donald trump. i think the media behavior -- and people do mistake when you criticize media behavior for how it treats donald trump. it doesn't mean i support him or am cheering him on. it is misread as you much be supporting him because you said this. it has nothing to do with that. it's looking at what i see is fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate. i have spoken out frequently about that, including some of the washington post coverage. >> watch sunday night at 9:00 eastern on cspan 2 book tv. >>> lesbians and gays talk about their personal experiences in the fight for marriage equality, transgender rights. a couple that led to the legalization of same-sex marriage in california are among those taking part. >> welcome to our fifth annual lbgt forum. this is a special one for us. we're doing a number of wonderful things, celebrating our fifth year of our program and i'll tell you about the program in a moment. not the least of which is this incredibly powerhouse panel we've put togethe

donald trump why are you smearing john mccain? >> first of all, no offense to you. no. >> number two, i am not here to defend john mccain or donald trump. i think the media he had fear, people do mistaken when i criticize media behavior does not mean that i support donald trump or am cheering him on. i can see that as separate things but it is often misread as you must be supporting him or y becauseot like x or you are supporting it. it is not that. it is what i see is fair or accurate coverage. i have spoken about that including washington post coverage. >> watch on cspan2's tv. >> next on american history tv, conrad mallet, jr. remembers the 1967 detroit riot. he was a detroit free press paperboy and watched the riots unfold on the morning of july 23 and later became chief justice of the michigan supreme court. in this interview he talks about his experience that first morning. race relations, economic conditions before and after the riots. this is from detroit 1967, the oral and written history collection. >> conrad, thank you for being here today. this is part of our detroit

defend john mccain or donald trump. criticize media behavior that wanted to criticize me to be at times front treats donald trump it does mean a supported or and cheering him on. i can see it as a separate things but they dismiss red often as he must be supporting them for you must not like x or y because you said this. it has nothing to do with that pickets looking at what i see as fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate and i've spoken out pretty frequently about that including some of the "washington post" coverage. >> watch "after words" sunday night on c-span2's booktv. >> senate majority leader mitch mcconnell addressed the health care debate and he said in the coming weeks there would be a vote on repealing the affordable care act and replacing it later. he was followed by senate democratic leader charles schumer at the number of senate democrats in opposition to this plan to repeal the health care law and require a two year wait until a plan is considered. this >> one of the senate very first access c

but number two, i'm here to cheer on to defend john mccain or donald trump. en you criticize media behavior, it doesn't mean i support. i can see those as separate things. and read as must not like x or y because you said this. and has nothing to do with that and fair and accurate media overage and i have spoken out. book00 eastern on c-span's tv. >> today's state department briefing regarding the sanctions. iran was in compliance with the joint

john mccain. >> number one, no offense to you, this was the "washington post" i wrote about. >> no, i -- >> but number 2 i'm not here to cheer on john mccain or donald trump. i think the media behavior and people do mistake when you criticize media people or when i do at times, perhaps it's donald trump doesn't mean i support him or am cheering him on. i can see those as separate things but it is misread often as you must be supporting him or must not like x or y because you said this and it has nothing to do with that but looking at what i see as fair or accurate media coverage but the candidate and i have spoken out frequently about that including some of the "washington post" coverage. >> reporte. >>> next, hear from state and local education officials in a house education and the workforce committee hearing on the implementation of the every student succeeds act. the hearing runs two and a half

post" about about, but number two on literature on and defend john mccain or donald trump. i think the media behavior and people do mistake when you criticize media behavior are when i do criticize me media behavior, that doesn't mean a supporting or and cheering them on. i can see this as separate things but it is misread often as you must be supporting it we must not like x or y because he said this. that has nothing to do with that. it's look at what i see as fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate and i spoken out pretty frequently about that including some of the "washington post" coverage. >> watch "after words" sunday night at nine eastern on c-span2's booktv. >> today house budget committee chair diane black talked about the gop 2018 budget plan. she called proposal and action plan that reduces pentago been e spurs economic growth and returns power to the states. her remarks are about 20 minutes. >> [inaudible conversations] >> so good morning, everyone and thank you for being here. today where introducing the house fiscal you 2018 budget building a bett

john mccain? >> [indiscernible] >> i know it. >> i am not going to defend john mccain or donald trump.ny behavior, and people misbehave you use media behavior -- it doesn't mean i am supporting him or cheering him on. it is a public thing. it is read as he is being supported or you must not like x or y. it has nothing to do with looking at accurate media coverage. i'm spoken out frequently about that for the washington post coverage. rwords on 1: watch aftee "book tv." now i hearing for the air force general to be reappointed as vice chair of the joint chiefs of staff. he was appointed by president obama in 2015 and has been nominated by president trump for another two-year term. iraniansked about the nuclear program, north korea and cyber security. financials personal information was targeted after the data breach. john mccain normally chairs the senate armed services committee, but he is recovering from surgery, so senator james imhoff filled in. sen. inhofe:

john mccain. donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? >> number two, i am not here to cheer on john mccain or donald trump. -- itk the behavior doesn't mean i support him or i guess or treating him -- or cheering them on. you must be supporting him or you must not like extra why. it has nothing to do with looking at what i see is fear or accurate media coverage. i have spoken out about that. ask watch sunday night at 9:00 eastern on c-span2 book tv. c-span where history unfolds daily. created as aan was public service by america's cable television companies and is brought to you today by your cable or satellite provider. parliamenta's completed a two-week session that included debates about terrorism, medical party finances and australia's relationship with the u.s. here is a summary of the session from sky news australia. it is a half-hour. ♪ >> hello, i'm david spews. we are sadea

this incident as opposed to -- >> know also -- no offense to two, i am not going to defend john mccain or donald trump. when i criticize behavior at it does not mean i am supporting him or cheering him on. it has nothing to do it that, when i see their smear i have spoken up about that including the washington post coverage. watch this on c-span twos book tv. >> a discussion on health care in girl areas. this is about 25 minutes. dr. helen -- is with us now. she is an emergency room doctor. thank you for being with us. guest: thank you for having me on the show. spotlight week focused on that rest belt and the black belt. tell us what that is. guest: the black belt in 17 counties throughout alabama and mississippi. it was named after the soil originally. it has come to have a political music -- meaning. it expanded to include several other states throughout the south that are predominantly african-american population. may health care such a struggle in this part of the country. you focus on marion alabama. guest: before we talk about don't --his area doesn't have enough hospitals or doctors. there is

defend john mccain or donald trump. the behavior that people do mistake when you criticize media behavior, that does not mean i am supporting him or cheering him on. it is misread often as he must be supporting him or you must not like x or y. it is looking at what i see as fair or accurate media coverage. watch afterwards sunday night at 9:00 eastern on c-span2 book tv. american history tv is on c-span3 every weekend featuring museum tours, archival films and programs on the presidency, the civil war and more. here's a clip from a recent program. my argument today will strike beingeople as of this more common sense of that original. the kennedy assassination was a moment in the history of american national security. it was the aftermath of jfk's assassinations that was a pivotal moment as far as the consolidation of the national security regime. dallas wasnation in a moment of great danger for the cia. if the agency or any of its employees had been held responsible for the wrongful death of the president, the clandestin

donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? >> no offense to you. i am not here to cheer on or defend john mccain or donald trump. i think the media behavior, people do mistake when you criticize media behavior, i criticize media behavior at times doesn't mean i support him or am cheering him on. those are separate things. it is misread often as you must be supporting him or must not like x or why. it has nothing to do with that. it is looking at what i see as fair or accurate media coverage. i have spoken about it frequently including some washington post coverage. >> watch afterwards at 9:00 eastern on c-span2's booktv. >> tom cotton spoke about russian military strategy and recent reports that russia tested nuclear weapons in violation of the 1987 intermediate range nuclear forces treaty. his remark that the center for strategic and international studies in washington is about an hour. >> good morning, everyone.

but number two, i'm here to cheer on to defend john mccain or donald trump. en you criticize media behavior, it doesn't mean i support. i can see those as separate things. and read as must not like x or y because you said this. and has nothing to do with that and fair and accurate media overage and i have spoken out. book00 eastern on c-span's tv. >> today's state department briefing regarding the sanctions. iran was in compliance with the joint and iran was not living up o the spirit of that agreement the briefing is 40 minutes. >> we have some very special guests and joining us from iraq. ladies and gentlemen, sitting in the back of the room they work for the iraqi government and been visiting the united states learning more about journalism andthe work of spokesperson that is what they do. 12 of you aren't here. we like to thank you for coming to the united states and made a long trip after a very difficult time and a very hard fought battle in mosul. as part of their trip here, i want to mention they were at the meeting that took place at the state depart

defend john mccain or donald trump. ink the media behavior -- and people do mistake when you for howe media behavior it treats donald trump. it doesn't mean i support him or am cheering him on. i can see those as separate things. it is misread often as you must .e supporting him it has nothing to do with that. it's looking at what i see as fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate and i have spoken out and frequently about that. >> watched sunday night at 9:00 eastern on c-span twos but tv. booktv.n2's >> it's hard to believe this was once a thriving and booming business district, but it really was. there were stores owned by black, white, you name it. it, a rock was thrown. a glass was broken. fire started. it wasn't just black folks. it was one of the most integrated incidents that is ever happened in detroit. >> join us on the 50th anniversary of the 1967 detroit riots. live sunday starting at noon eastern on american history tv on c-span3. host: washington journal continues. -- host: i want to begin with

john mccain? you,rsonal, no offense to but number two, i will not cheer on an event john mccain or donald trump.hen you criticize media behavior, or when i criticized the behavior at times, that is not mean i support him or them cheering him on. i've even as separate things. you must beee it as supporting him or you must not like x 01, it has nothing to do , and i have spoken out pretty frequently about that, including in some of the "washington post" coverage. >> watch "after words" on c-span2's booktv. >> our live coverage of the commissioning of the uss gerald r ford is today at 10:00 a.m. eastern. the super carrier, named after our 38 president, is the nation's newest aircraft carrier. president trump will attend the ceremony in the pool, virginia and deliver remarks to the more than 14,000 people expected to begin. today at 10:00 a.m. eastern on c-span and since then our come and listen -- and c-span.org, and listen live on the free c-span radio app. >> "washington journal" continues. host: dr. helen ouyang is with us now. she is a "harper's magazine" contributor. she is also emergency room

donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? >> no offense to you. i am not here to cheer on or defend john mccain or donald trump. i think, people mistake when you criticize media behavior, but when i do or how it treats donald trump, it doesn't mean i support him or am cheering him on. -- that isold separate things. it is read often as, you must be supporting him or you must not like x or y because you said this. it is not that. it is looking at what i think is fair and accurate media coverage. i have spoken out frequently about that. >> watch at 9:00 eastern on c-span2's book tv. >> i sat in my wagon with my dog, and i watched the riot. riot directly across from our paper station. a clothing store called jack's place, i saw a guy come out of the clothing store with 10 hats on his head, literally in a stack, carrying bundles of things, clothes, with him. >> the 50th anniversary of the 1967 detroit riots, sunday at noon he eastern. american history tv is live from the detroit repressed newsroom with first-hand accounts. >> they gave the order, don't shoot. be cool. just let it go. that is the order they gave. word

donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? number one, no offense to you. i'm not here to cheer on john mccain or donald trump. i think the media behavior -- do mistake media behavior for how it treats trump, it doesn't mean i support, hammer or cheer him on. but it's often interpreted as you must be supporting or not x or y because you said this. it's not to do with that but i see as fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate. out about that. >> now a look at the global influence of the press. this discussion includes journalists talking about the and howmedia landscape people outside the industry

mccain. as opposed to saying, donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? >> no offense to you. i'm not here to cheer on or defend john mccain or donald trump. people mistake when you criticize media behavior. i don't support donald trump or am cheering him on. i see that as separate things. it is misread as you must be supporting him or months not like x or y. it has nothing to do with that. fair and accurate media coverage about the candidate. watch "afterwards" sunday night." >> c-span, where history unfolds daily. in 1979, c-span was created as a public service by america's cable television companies and is brought to you today by your cable or satellite provider. at the white house friday, president trump welcomed the service members of the uss arizona, who survived the 1941 attack on pearl harbor. during the visit, the president was reportedly given a piece of the battleship, along with a commemorative hat and calling. from the oval office, this is 10 minutes.

you feel is not properly reported on this incident as opposed to saying donald trump, why you smearing john mccain? cheer on oreo defend john mccain donald trump, i think the media behavior, it's a big mistake when you -- it certainly doesn't mean i support him or cheer them on. i can see it as a separate things. it's often misread as you must be supporting him or he must like x and y because of what you said. it has nothing to do with that. i've spoken out frequently about that. >> watch afterwards at 9:00 eastern. washington journal continues. i guess now is congressman tim ryan, democrat from ohio. our guest is the measure -- member of the appropriations committee. what is your take on what is happening with you for the care act and the efforts on the republican side to repeal and replace?

donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain?" wasn't "the washington post" i wrote about. i am not here to defend john mccain or donald trump. think when people mistake when you criticize media behavior for how it treats donald trump. it is not that i'm supporting him or cheering them on. it is misread often as you must be supporting him or you must not like x or y because he said this. it is looking at what i see as fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate. i have spoken out about that. >> 9:00 eastern on c-span 2's booktv. "washington journal" continues. now, here to us discuss ongoing budget deliberations in the 2018 house gop budget released this week. thank you for joining us. viewers what the heritage foundation and the center for american progress are. guest: the heritage foundation

donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? >> this was the washington post wrote about. number two, i am not here to cheer on orefend john mccain are donald trump. i think people mistake when you criticize media behavior for how it treats donald trump. it does not mean i support him or i am cheering him on. separatese are things. it is read often as you must be supporting him or you do not y because you said this. it is what ics fair, accurate media coverage about the candidate. i have spoken out frequently about that including washington post coverage. >> watch afterwards on book tv. >> the presidential advisory commission on election integrity held its first meeting with vice president mike pence chairing the et

i'm not here to cheer on john mccain or donald trump. i think the media behavior -- do mistake media behavior for how it treats trump, it doesn't mean i support, hammer or cheer him on. but it's often interpreted as you must be supporting or not x or y because you said this. it's not to do with that but i see as fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate. out about that. >> now a look at the global influence of the press. this discussion includes journalists talking about the and howmedia landscape people outside the industry respond to what's being reported. from the center for strategic and international studies, this is just over an hour. [captions performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2017] >> good morning, everyone, and you for coming. i'm glad to see there's a large group of students in the room. want to raise your hands. that's great. wow. i'm deborah mccarthy, the executive director of a new csis towe have here at bring diverse voices and diverse perspectives to di

donald trump why are you smearing john mccain? >> well, number one, no offense to you, a washington post i wrote about, but number two, i'm not here to cheer on ordefend john mccain or donald trump, i think the media behavior and people do mistake when you criticize media what i -- behavior or how they do donald trump, doesn't mean i support him or cheer him on. i can see those as separate things. you must be supporting him or you must not like x or y because he said this, it has nothing to do with that. it's looking at what i see is fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate and i have spoken out frequently including some of the washington post coverage. >> watch after words on book tv. >> next, a forum on recent events and the future of venezuela. the secondary general of the organization of america state joins economic and social justice specialist as they review the effects of last three months of protest against the government and what might happen in the country's general assembly starting july 30th. this is live coverage on c pan 2. -- c-span2. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudib

john mccain. >> number one, no offense to you, it was the "washington post" i wrote about. >> no, no. >> but, number two, i'm not here to cheer on our defend john mccain or donald trump. i do think the media behavior and people mistake when i criticize it at times for criticizing donald trump doesn't mean i'm supporting him or cheering him on, those are separate things but it is read often you must be supporting him or must not like x or y because you said this. it has nothing to do with that but what i see as fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate and i have spoken out about that -- >> -- sunday at 9:00 eastern on c-span2's book tv. c-span where history unfolds daily. in 1979, c-span was created as a public service by america's cable television companies and is brought to you today by your cable or satellite provider. >> tonight on c-span3, a senator environment and public works subcommittee hearing looks at the country's water infrastructure then the house appropriations committee marks up the 2018 homeland security spending bill. later we'll hear from some of the new members of the 115th congress. c-span's "washington journal" live every day with news

defended john mccain or donald trump. --hink the media behavior and people mistake when you criticize media behavior or when i criticize media behavior for how it treats donald trump. it does not mean i'm cheering him on. i see those as separate things. it is misread often as you must be supporting him or you must not like x or y because you said this. it has nothing to do with that. it is what i see as fear or accurate media coverage and i have spoken out about that. >> watch afterwards tonight at 9:00 eastern on c-span2's book tv. susan: our guest is luke messer of indiana. he is part of the house leadership team and chairman of the republican policy committee. we have him with us for the next minutes. 25 let me introduce you to reporters who ask you questions. arkin covers congress for real clear politics. we start out and i want to ask

mccain. you feel he has not properly reported on this incident. one, --r [indiscernible] number two, i'm not here to cheer on or defend john mccain or donald trump. opleia behavior, supportst for how it donald trump. i can see those as separate things. it means you must be supporting him or you don't like x or y because you said this. it has nothing to do with that. medialooking at fair or -- fair or accurate media coverage. c-span 2.fterwords on

john mccain. >> number one, no offense to you, this was the "washington post" i wrote about. >> no, i -- >> but number 2 i'm not here to cheer on john mccain or donald trump. i think the media behavior and people do mistake when you criticize media people or when i do at times, perhaps it's donald trump doesn't mean i support him or am cheering him on. i can see those as separate things but it is misread often as you must be supporting him or must not like x or y because you said this and it has nothing to do with that but looking at what i see as fair or accurate media coverage but the candidate and i have spoken out frequently about that including some of the "washington post" coverage. >> reporte. >>> next, hear from state and local education officials in a house education and the workforce committee hearing on the implementation of the every student succeeds act. the hearing runs two and a half hours. >> the committee on education workforce will come to order. good morning. welcome to today's full committee hearing. i thank our panel of witnesses and our committee members for joining today's discussion on the implementation of the every student succee

donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? >> this was the washington post wrote about. number two, i am not here to cheer on or defend john mccain are donald trump. i think people mistake when you criticize media behavior for how it treats donald trump. it does not mean i support him or i am cheering him on. separatese are things. it is read often as you must be supporting him or you do not y because you said this. it is what ics fair, accurate media coverage about the candidate. i have spoken out frequently about that including washington post coverage. >> watch afterwards on book tv. >> the presidential advisory commission on election integrity held its first meeting with vice president mike pence chairing the meeting. before he came in to start the meeting, the president spoke briefly. this is just over two hours. >> ladies and gentlemen, the vice president of the united states. >> good morning. please be seated. on behalf of the first family, welcome to the white house. and welcome to the inaugural meeting of the presidential on electionmission integrity of the area of just over two months ago, may 11, pre

feel has not properly reported on this as opposed to saint donald trump why are you fighting with john mccain? number two i am not here to cheer on or a friend john mccain. i think the media behavior which i think that people criticize media behavior or when i criticize it for donald trump does not mean i support him are and cheering him on great i see that as a separate ink. it is misread often as you must be supporting him or you must not like things because you said this. to do withas nothing that when you look at what i see is fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate and i have spoken pretty frequently about this. >> watch afterwards tonight on c-span two book tv. announcer: 50 years ago on july 23, 1967, detroit europe in five -- you rusted in five days a civil disorder. the next day, president lyndon b. johnson announced 5000 federal troops would be sent to detroit. this is about 10 minutes. in the early morning today, he told him of the extreme disorder -- president johnson: in the early morning today, governor romney communicated with ramsey clark and told him of the extreme disorder in detroit, michigan. the atto

donald trump, why you smearing john --ain question mark guest: john mccain? guest: no offense to you. two, when i criticize media behavior for how it treats donald trump, it does not mean ice or him or i am cheering him on. i see those as separate things but it is read often as he must be supporting him or must not like x or y because he said this. it has nothing to do it that. it is looking at what i think is fair coverage. >> watch sunday night. >> washington journal continues. host: the headline on the front of many papers this morning. john mccain battling brain cancer. it was announced last night. he is recovering in arizona after a routine examination found a blood clot and he had that surgically removed and he was recovering in arizona and now this move -- this news this morning. twitter,ion on represented steve scully's recovering in the hospital from gunshot wounds saying praying for my friend senator john , one of the toughest people i know. gabrielle giffords, a congresswoman who was shot, "-- and the president tweeting out -- -- and senator from missouri -- and meghan mccain, the daughter of the senator, releasing this statement last night on twitter saying -- hos

john mccain donald trump. i think the media behavior -- people do mistake when you criticize media behavior at times for how it treats donald trump -- it does not mean i support him or him cheering him on. i see those as separate things. you mustread often as be supporting him or you must not like x or y. that has nothing to do with that. see asoking at what i fair or accurate media coverage and i have spoken out frequently about that, particularly with "washington post" coverage. words."ight on "after tv,ext on american history conrad mallet, jr., remembers the 1967 detroit riot. he was a detroit free press paperboy and watched the riots unfold on the morning of july 23 and later became chief justice of the michigan supreme court. in this interview he talks about his experience that first morning. race relations, economic conditions before and after the riots. this is from detroit 1967, the oral and written history collection. >> conrad, thank you for being here today. >> my pleasure. >> this is part of our detroit '67 project. we are trying to get perspectives on 1967 recollections, personal, neighborhood, what the city was like. what happened, your sense of the f

donald trump, why you smearing john --ain question mark guest: john mccain? guest: no offense to you. two, when i criticize media behavior for how it treats donald trump, it does not mean ice orim or i am cheering him on. i see those as separate things but it is read often as he must be supporting him or must not like x or y because he said this. it has nothing to do it that.

donald trump are you smearing senator kaine? >> first of all, i am not here to savage john mccain are donald trump. i think when you criticize the media behavior or when i criticize the media at times they say i'm supporting trump or cheering him on. i see there is a separate things. they say you do that often, you must be supporting him or you y because ite x or is against him but that is not one look at, i have spoken out very frequently when ice think something is not fair. this sunday at 9:00 p.m. on c-span's booktv. >> a fiscal year resolution that allocates billions of dollars for defense and $511 billion in discretionary funding. the measure now heads to the full house for consideration. we will show you a portion of the committee markup. this is just under 3.5 hours. >> the committee will now come to order and we will

donald trump, are you sneering john mccain? >> of the eroded but that >> no-no. >> number two, i will not cheer on john mccain or donald i think when you set aside a deer -- when i criticize new behavior for donald trump. doesn't mean i support him or them cheering in -- him on. i separate things. not like x orust y because you said this. it's not that, it's looking at actual media coverage about the candidate. i've spoken frequently about that include washington post's coverage. what's what afterwards sunday night at 9:00 eastern on c-span2's book tv. >> sunday on q and a >> when you look at president obama's domestic legacy, i think there are two things that are very important that you will have long-lasting good consequences for the united states, that can be summarized in four words: sunny side of my more -- sonia sotomayor and elena kagan. >> our interview with david gero, who discusses his book, rising star: the mcnabb barack obama, which covers president obama's life up to his winning the presidency. >> the point to emphasize is that over the course of barack's presidency, there were scores and scores of people in illino

will feel properly reported on this, as opposed to saying donald trump why are you smearing john mccain? i am not here to focus in downtown or john mccain. behavior for that, does not mean i support him or i am cheered him on. i see that as a separate thing. it is rather you must be supporting him because you said this paid it has nothing to do with that. out about that including some of the washington post coverage. >> watch afterwards tonight. >> now a house judiciary subcommittee hearing with federal, state and local law enforcement officials talking about combating gang activity. this front just over one hour.

john mccain of donald trump. trump. i think the media behavior and people do -- when you criticize media behavior. it doesn't mean i support him or am cheering him on. i consider those separate things , but it is misread often as you must not like x or y, you must be supporting him. it has nothing to do with that. it has what to do with what i think is fair or accurate about the candidate. i have spoken out about that. >> watch sunday night at 9:00 tv."rn on c-span "book each week we visit historic museums and places. up next, we visit the franklin d at hydelt museum park in new york. mr. eberhardt:

on the strategy, who had advised ryan zinke threaten lisa murkowski or wheret the strategy not befriending john mccain, donald trump an tag fiezs the people he needs, do you see evidence that john kelly is financial to have a more subtle hand at that kind of advising of the president? >> well, i would offer this, if you are a four star marine general, that is the rank at which john kelly left his service to the united states military that is a very political accomplishment. it is an accomplishment with a lot of discipline and there is a lot of management experience when are you a general. so it's not in the policy and politics world, but anyone that reaches that level of a general has had to deal with bernal excushion with plan and did work as a liaison to congress if uniform. as to there are a couple building blocks there, that are areas where the president can look for new structure. he wants it to be well received publicly. he found when he makes decisions with people broadly respected lick people if both parties respect someone of john kelly's stature, that's something the president likes. he wants to hear this

preliminary discussions or comments by collins, john mccain and others saying hey we need to work with democrats here. so that'll be the threat. do you want to face that pressure from donald trumpo not give him the cookie, or you want to face the threat of voting for a bill that only has 20% public support? nobody wants to be on the 20/80 split. >> at the risk of bipartisanship, what people voted for? >> there are people who want to repeal it and include ted cruz and mike lee in that and that amendment pushes in that direction and others want to improve it. keep the basic structure in place and tweak it. those things are irreconcilable. >> then a third group, americans who want health care. we have to take a break. lonnie, thank you so much. panel, please stick around. up next, escape from d.c. with jared kushner facing even more scrutiny and calls to revoke his security clearance. well, they have jetted off to mingle with billionaires. i said billionaires. some investors, some media, tech titans, totally normal. wouldn't that seem they would do in the midst of this? we'll take you live to that exclusive conference in sun valley, idaho, where their presence is raising big quest

donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? >> guest: well, number one, no offense to you, the "washington post" writer -- >> host: no, no. >> guest: but number two, i'm not here to cheer on or defend mccain or donald trump. i think the media behavior and people do mistake when you criticize media behavior or when die criticize media behavior for how it treats donald trump, doesn't mean i support him or cheering him on. can see those aspirate things little but it is misread often as you must be supporting him or don't like x or y because you said this. it has nothing to do with that. it's looking at what i see is fair or accurate media coverage about the candidate and i have spoken out pretty frequently about that, including the "washington "washington post" coverage. >> guest: in fact let's read this segment about you. would you like to answer this part. >> host: i'm happy to. which one is this? >> guest: the one about-my transactional journal jim chapter and release of e-mails between clinton -- you wrote an article criticizing the smarmy press dealings composed the e-mail saying corrupt journalism doesn't pay and then i say you're about to become embride in the very contr

donald trump why are you smearing john mccain? you but thet washington post ever about. not doing this for mccain or donald trump, i am criticizing media behavior. it does not mean i support donald trump or am cheering him on. i see those as separate things. but it is read most often as, you must be supporting him because you said this. it has nothing to do with looking at what i said before or after video coverage and i have spoken out very often about that. "afterwards"tch booktv c-span2. >> the president talked about creating manufacturing jobs. senator patty murray delivers the democratic response talking about health care. president trump: my fellow americans. on monday i signed a

john mccain or mitt romney or george w. bush talking about al gore six months into his administration? but, you know, donald trumpone thing, winning and losing. that's how he defines everything in life. what's clearly bothering him is the suggestion that somehow his victory was illegitimate, that so you because of the russian involvement that he really wasn't a legitimate winner of the election and, therefore, not a legitimate president, that he didn't actually win. and that seems to be really bothering him, and it provokes this constant return to hillary clinton. i have great respect for hillary clinton, but i don't know anybody who talks about hillary clinton more than donald trump. >> i want to ask you about your special tonight, "the axe files." talk to activist john lewis. you have a powerful relationship with him. he relives a violent experience that he lived firsthand. let's all watch. >> through those earphones is a depiction of the scene that you faced when you sat there. i want to ask you to sit down, put those headphones on and let's talk when you're done. >> okay. >> if you don't get it, boy, i'm goin

donald trump why are you smearing john mccain?. >> guest: there was an article that i wrote about but i am not here to cheer or defend mccain or trombone -- trump the one idea criticized that behavior that doesn't mean i support him or i in cheering him on. i see that separate but it is miss read if you support him then you must not like the other. it has nothing to do with that but what i say is fair or accurate media coverage and i have speaking now frequently about pac -- that >> host: let's. >> that's fine. >> i will read this little segment about you. >> with my transactional a journalism chapter between the journalist and the clinton aides you wrote an article about the press dealing saying corrupt journalism does not pay. that i city were about to become embroiled in the controversy that you criticize but then they wrote you a letter making it clear that you have the engaged in some of that transactional journalism when it comes to me. and he says u.s. admitted for a wide ranging discussion of sharyl attkisson and what the ground rules would be for the talk and you stipulate to call the shots on the discussion about sharyl attki

donald trump why are you staring john mccain?. >> that was "the washington post" but i am not here to cheer on or defend mccain or trollope but the behavior when you criticize media behavior that doesn't mean i support him or i am chairing hanlon -- cheering him on it is separate or you must support him because he said this you must not like him and that has nothing to do with it. but what i say is fair or accurate media coverage today have spoken out about that including "the washington post" coverage. in fact, this segment about you would you be happy to answer this part?. >> this is the one about which transactional journalism chapter a leaked e-mail you wrote an article criticizing the dealings saying it does not pay. so that i say you are about to become involved in the controversy you criticize but then they fired back at you to make it clear he thinks he'll have engaged in the same transaction call journalism and then came after me which i found it surprising to say that you limited you asked hillary clinton's a with a wide discussion and sharyl attkisson -- sharyl attkisson and that you stipulate to call the shots on the

donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? >> guest: number one no offense to you and number two i'm not here to defend or cheer on. people do mistake when you criticize media behavior at times it doesn't mean i support him or that i'm cheering him on. i see those as separate things to do this misread often as you must be supporting him or you must not like x. or y. because it has nothing to do with that and it's looking at the fair and accurate media coverage and i've spoken out frequently including some of the "washington post" coverage. in fact let's read this little segment about you if you would like to answer this part. >> host: which one is this? >> guest: this is the one about my transaction journalism chapter and there are some e-mails between journalists and clinton and you wrote an article criticizing the press exposed to the e-mail saying corrupt journalism doesn't pay, and then i say you're about to become involved in a very controversial criticized clinton aide fires back at you in a letter that he wrote you making it clear that he thinks you've engaged in some of the same transaction journalism and i

infuriating to any senator, republican or democrat, because as john mccain said earlier in the week, they are a co-equal branch, not subservient to the president. i think donald trumpd in trying to bully lisa murkowski and trying to exert pressure on some of these senators and he just learned that there are some people, there are some politicians, who have a steel spine and do not cower under pressure. >> ana navarro, thank you so much. we'll see what's up next, how tax reform goes. may be a bit better for the republicans. we shall see. >>> let's move on. the bitter tensions between two of president trump's top aides getting uglier. just a short time ago, we know that both the white house communications director, anthony scaramucci, aka the mooch and chief of staff reince priebus were on air force one with the president as he traveled to long island. an interesting trip, to say the least, after scaramucci dropped jaws with his vulgarity-laced interview with the new yorker's ryan lizza. he used, we'll call it nc-17 rated insults against steve bannon. let's get more perspective on scaramucci and priebus from two people who know them, cnn special correspondent jamie g

or rather create opposition research on then candidate donald trump. and opposition research dossier containing false allegations about trump, the entire dossier has been discredited. and it was senator john mccainwho delivered a dossier, that dossier to fbi director james comey late last year. joining me now, congressman louie gohmert, member of the house judiciary committee. former judge and attorney, great to have you here. your reaction to first, let's start, if we may in some sequence. immigration parole that was given by the attorney general, then attorney general loretta lynch. but a reading of the statute that makes it possible to create this waiver says, secretary, as in secretary of homeland security. what is going on? how did loretta lynch, if you know, how did she get involved in this? >> i don't know how she got involved but it is obvious that russian attorney was here on capitol hill and apparently had a lot more success with democrats. she was lobbying than with republicans. and you know, normally to be sitting behind an ambassador like she was, you showed the picture, ambassador -- lou: got it right over your shoulder now. >> i've been in, no telling whom hearings, and you don't

properly reported on this incident as opposed to saying hey, donald trump, why are you smearing john mccain? >> number two, i'm not here to cheer on or defend john mccane. i think it certainly doesn't mean i support him or i'm cheering him on. it is misread often as you must be supporting him or you must not like x or y because you have said this. it has nothing to do with that. it is what i see as fair or accurate media kof rang. >> watch sunday night at 9:00 eastern on book tv. >>> in about 20 minutes the house budget committee meets to mark up the budget for the 2018 fiscal year. until it gets aroundway we'll show you to amendments expected.

obama to donald trump or where trump greatly -- >>> another set back for the senate health care bill, majority leader mitch mcconnell said he's putting a hold on the bill. while senator john mccainsurgery to remove a blood clot from above his eye. the procedure was done on friday after a routine visit to his doctor. >> i don't know whether it will pass or not, but we should not be messing with -- evaluate what the squebss are going to be. >> we would have a clean repeal and we would have a spending bill and they could actually be advanced simultaneously on the same day, moderates would get what they want. conservatives would get what we want, a clean repeal, which is really the only thing we promised in the election, and we promised it over and over again. >> and the number one question, does mitch mcconnell have the necessary 50 votes? here's secretary tom price saying in a meeting this morning that it is uncertain. >> do you think they'll be able to get this done dr. price? >> i do think so because the senators know what's out in right now is not working. >> did mcconnell have the votes to get it passed? >> i don't know. >> kelly, another welcome to you for this day, let's get