it has to do it's john mclaughlin. john was a career cia analyst who rose up the ranks at langl langley. he became a director of central intelligence and an acting director of central intelligen intelligence. rhonda the interesting things it's john which i mentioned in the book at that whenever you go up to his office for meetings he kept on his desk, a little puckered. the placket read the dominant paradox. now i always thought that this was a funny little staying. a little bit tongue-in-cheek because it contrasted so strongly it's john mclaughlin. he is the very establishment dive boat guy. he wears conservative suits, glasses, suspenders. if you look at him, you think at the last guy who would want to do the predominant paradigm. i think part of the reason he had us on his desk at because he enjoyed playing against and implying that he had this hidden beneath establishment and air. but i think it was actually a serious purpose behind this is it too. that's because paradigms are really serious things. paradigms are th

also a couple people with firsthand experience in the ic, john mclaughlin and robert litt.o i think that i have three pretty good people on this. ken, the latest now, what is the next steps to seeing where we are with getting this information. >> well, joe mcguire acting director who is really under fire here is going to appear in public next week before the house intelligence committee at their request. but nobody expects him to talk in any kind of detail about this complaint because he is really hamstrung. and by the way this is a former navy s.e.a.l. who has been praised on both sides of the aisle as a straight shooter. he is in a position where the justice department has essentially decided. >> it seems as if the inspector general at first during the first letter implied that the dni wanted to basically go forward but checked with justice first. is that the correct -- >> well, he is being criticized because some people believe that the law doesn't really provide for that, it just says once the icig decides it should go to congress, it is just a rubber stamp. but given t

it has to do with john mclaughlin. john was a career cia analyst who rose up to the ranks at langley and became deputy director of central intelligence and then act director 0 central intelligence in the early 2001s, 2000's, and on the interesting things but john which is mention in the book, whenever you went up to his office for meetings, he kept on his desk a little black placard, that read divert to dominant dime. thought that was a funny little saying, a little tongue in cheek because it contrasts so strongly with him, who is a very establishment kind of guy. he wears conservative suits, horn rimmed glasses, suspenders and you think this is the last guy that would want to subvert the dominant paradigm, and why he had this on his desk was he enjoyed playing against type, implying he had this hidden subversive side beneath the establishment veneer. but i think there was actually a serious purpose behind this, too. and that's because paradigms are really serious things. paradigms are the conceptual models we all use t