>> john pavel. >> okay. so because your presentation is pretty dense, and at some points technic technical, i am going to be peppering your presentation with questions, all right? >> high level and all about six options. and the six options from the interview list of about 40 people throughout the city, the state, and with the six options it was all about the cost, the timeline, the risk, and next step. with that, i was going to pass on to james to talk about where we came with the high level recommendations. >> sure. >> all right. >> one thing that it was not, this was not a full detailed scoping of what the voting is is. this was not -- that is really a key thing here is that z we estimated based on what we believe the voting system could be and used that as the basis for everything, but not a full, detailed design of what a voting system would be. the next area we wanted to summarize what we learned to share that and the complexity that wenlt into the report and the detail with the options which ranged fr