pocahontas mares john ralph in this church in 1614. i guarantee you i'm standing exactly a little deeper than she was, but this is where pocahontas stood when they got married. had to. had to. they stand right in the chancel, in the center. you've been to weddings. that's kind of, wow, you can actually do that with archaeology. now i want to get you to come down and we're going to get in the trench down there. and just we'll gather out into here. and we have danny smith here, digging away with dan smith. and he is -- you can tell them what you're doing there, danny. >> okay. if my voice can hold up. so what we're doing is difficult. we're digging into a well. and this well happens to be in the southwest corner of the church. now, it looks like that's just a coincidence, though. but we wanted to make sure that it didn't relate to the church. so thus we dig into it, see if we can find diagnostic or dateable artifacts. it's here until 1817 and it shifts to another location over there. what we've been finding are artifacts later than that

ralph nater endorsed john edwards in 2008. the time -- >> by the way just another historic "stephanie miller show" example of how these two were wrong, and i was right. [ bell chimes ] [ applause ] >> there is something about him i don't trust. >> the worst thing is not that he cheated on his wife. he is human. the worst thing was that he had this love child and his girlfriend, and he was willing to get the nomination with this secret. he was willing to go into october knowing that uncle rupert could spring it around halloween week about the love child and he was willing to give mccain palin the entire election. >> here is my new feature. what up with chicks? [ nbc "nightly news" theme ] >> there was a woman on the jury flirting with him. oh, my god he is so cute when he gets upset. so hot. >> yeah, america wouldn't be the same without women who think, i could change him. >> yeah. >> isn't it weird when i got my ap alert on my cell phone that i didn't rush to the television to see what happened? >> no, it was a non-issue. [ nb

does that mean john ash rauft comes back and resumed his singing career with orrin hatch? i don't know. donald trump is a statesman next to ralph read, who is a statesman next to herman cain. they should go after it because romney is this placid front for this party that is a radical right wing party. >> in terms of the democratic criticism of it, i mean, your whole take on this, your whole piece is about how everybody says they don't like negative ads, but a, they work, and b, there is nothing shameful in them provided they are factual, and that they are -- they're done for the right reason, which essentially is to win because you ought to win over somebody who has hard truths who should be told about them. one of the things you say is that any president should go negative early, often, without apology if the goal is victory. the notion that negative campaigning is toxic is bogus. everybody on both sides of the aisle believes it's modern, believes we never used to do this. >> it's crazy. one campaign i talk about is the andrew jackson/john quincy adams campaign jackson was accused of cannibalism. his wife was described as a bi

john ashkroft comes back and resumes his singing career with orrin hatch? i don't know you characterized the people better than i could. donald trump is a statesman next to ralph reid who is a statesman next to herman cain. but they should go after it. because romney is a placid front for the party that is a radical right-wing party. >> in terms of the democratic criticism of it, your whole take on this, your whole piece is about how everybody says they don't like negative ads but a, they work and b, there's nothing shameful them provided they are factual and they are done for the right reason, which is essentially to win because you ought to win over somebody that has hard truths that should be told about them. but one thing you say every president should go negative early and often if the goal is victory. the notion that negative marketing is bogus. everybody believes that we never used to do this. >> it is crazy. one campaign i talk about is the andrew jackson, john quincy adams campaign where jackson was accused of cannibalism. his wife was described as a bigamist. his mother a prostitute and those were the nice things that were said. that was in the early