. >> which is a fairly -- >> he's john rawles. >> yes. >> inequalities are justified if they lead to a general increase in wealth. so no one has a problem with lots of people getting very rich as long as this increases the wealth of everyone else. when it stops increasing the wealth of society as a whole, you have to ask questions about the nature of the system. >> but he didn't -- he didn't just mean wealth. he said the public welfare. and that meant that this pursuit of material wealth had to take a backseat in certain respects in a great -- if america was going to become a great country. and that's why he defended conservation. >> i wouldn't call it -- weird emperialism. i would say it's america that has an important place to play in the world is a more positive way of putting it. and conservatives have embraced that part of t.r. in that original part of progressive. i just want to add to that very quickly that there's plenty of room for evasiveness on both sides. two wars were initiated in the bush administration. and for the first time in our history, there was no attention to t