this is not john rawls digna taught us you money. it's an understanding that there is an inviolability of the individual as created in the image and likeness of god. it is wrong to coerce somebody about fundamental matters of belief and so forth. that according to the church has to be understood in relationship to it broad conception of her since understood as a t. a logical -- teleological destiny. that's the short answer. it's a good question in the confiscated one. >> one or two more questions. >> or we could just go have a glass of wine. >> would you say that one of the unintended consequences of the reformation is what we see manifested today in a world that is becoming a place where everything is gray, and there are no absolutes of right or wrong. in a conversation with someone a few months ago, i turned to them and they said you don't believe in absolutes. i said i can't have a conversation with you where i would be like, actually said it would be like a sophist. you argue just for the sake of arguing and you don't come to any