officers found john samuels of osceola avenue yesterday morning. police suspect of violence because his body was badly bruised. >>> new information about a man who died at a steel plant in canton. kenny ray junior was a fire technician at the steel plant and was also a police officer in wayne county. was new to its department and was well-liked liked by his peers. photograph of array on its facebook page for with it was a post bearing dozens friends. they say a fire technician was found dead sunday at the fair checking extinguishers. statement the loss of a colleague. they will continue to work with local officials in the investigation. >>> osha has cited and ohio window manufacturer for serious violations after a 22-year-old employees right hand was caught in the rollers of a glass press he was cleaning. the workers suffered fractures, nerve and tendon damage, and injury could've been prevented if the vista follow proper safety standards. >>> new video of another smash and grab. this one on the far southeast side. police said someone drove a car s

family members found john samuels at his home on osceola la avenue on sunday morning. police say he had bruises and abrasions on his body. investigators suspect violence. the medical examiner is conducting an autopsy today. >>> bucyrus city school district is closed today for the funeral of noah leer. the 17-year-old bucyrus junior died from injuries in a freak accident while playing basketball. nearly 15 grand for the family. >> tia: today we hope to learn the cause of a massive fire that destroyed a wendy's restaurant in massillon. look at the photos. you can see flames and smoke just shooting out of the top of that building there. no one was hurt. crews stayed on the scene most of sunday putting out hotspots. >>> it's money "money-saving monday." >> brian: nichole vrsansky caught up with a local couponing blogger rachel to find some family friendly and inexpensive ideas. nikki. >> nichole: this one works with younger or older kids. it's an app to download for free on your phone called geocaching. it's a mobile scavenger hunt. you can pick easy levels for kids and mo

bottom line -- for folks like john samuels and me, who sometimes bemoan the complexity of the tax law, the lesson may be, it could have been worse. not surprisingly, i have not found any economic analysis in the early files. but i have found some early revenue estimates, and i'm sure they would provide a good laugh to the economists on the staff. the connections between roswell mcgill and collins stamm, the longest-serving chief of staff by far, and the joint committee, were all unexpected. as joe thorndike has written, mcgill was indisputably one of the most important tax officials of the 1930's. but i have no idea how involved he was in the joint committee's story. mcgill had both a personal and professional connection with the joint committee. his personal involvement was that he was asked not once, but twice to join the staff. and had he accepted either opportunity, his 37 year career on staff might not have happened. a professional connection occurred in 1938 when, as undersecretary of the treasury, mcgill requested and obtained the third edition of the proposed code. but then, i

bottom line -- for folks like john samuels and me, who sometimes bemoan the complexity of the tax law, the lesson may be it could have been worse. not surprisingly, i have not found any economic analysis in the early files. but i have found some early documents, and i'm sure they would provide a good laugh t the economists on the staff. the connections between roswell and collins game, the longest-serving chief of staff by far and the joint committee, were all unexpected. as joe thorndike has written, mcgill was indisputably one of the most important tax officials of the 1930's. but i have no idea how involved was in the joint committee's authority. mcgill had both a personal and professional connection with the joint committee. his personal involvement was that he was asked not once, but twice to join the staff. had he accepted either of --unity, his 37 year 37 years on staff might not have happened. a professional connection occurred in 1938 when his undersecretary of the treasury, mcgill requested and obtained the third edition of the proposed code. but then, in a lengthy address h

there were six justices, john marshall, samuel chase, william therson of new jersey, washington who wasrelated to george, his nephew. cushing and more. -- moore. did they not anticipate there might be tied up votes? it was not nearly so important then as it has become. the even number has its from our point of view. although the anticipated judicial review, i did not inc. they knew it would be quite the 800-pound gorilla it would become. >> where did it meet? >> that is an interesting story system oflizes the government, because in it isgton at that time that the president house, which became the white house. the capital was under construction. nobody even thought about where the supreme court would beat, it was that insignificant. the attention get of anybody, including secretary of state john marshall. justice, heme chief got much more interested in that question. they ended up giving the supreme court this very small, and day committee room in the capital which they shared with other courts. so that was the home of the supreme court very late in the game. almost an afterthought. arti

maclean ofners, john ohio, samuel nelson of new york, curtiof pennsylvania, and s of massachusetts. it was logically a 5-4 decision. the odds were stacked against dred scott. prof. bracey: absolutely, it was worse than that, you had 7-9 who are democrats. the five a southerner's ec, descend from slave owning families. really, you have serious author against dred scott. ms. swain: and that was ultimately the bow, the two northerners were whigs who voted with dred scott. we have video of the old supreme court chamber in the u.s. capital which is where the case was argued. we will show you that. and we set the stage for the case being heard. what was alike the first time around? inf. jones: i think that some sense, it is a case that his much-anticipated by the time it reaches the court. himself is eager to take on these questions, and dred scott provides him with his only opportunity in this critical period not only to impact the jurisprudence, but in effect, to have a role in the political questions that are set to entrench the nations. the court is poised, would you agree chris? prof

we had a change in the supreme court in 2005, with chief justice john roberts. 2006, samuel leto. we had the historical election of barack obama and two more changes with sonia sotomayor in 2009 and kagan in 2010. and citizens united has replaced bush v. gore as a bit of a rallying cry at least. and yet bush v. gore endures for many of us. just when i think people have stopped thinking about it or stopped asking about it, i'll give a speech somewhere, just like last summer in connect where the first question was, and what about that bush v. gore? so it endures and mainly from folks on the left. but we're here today to take into account both sides and look at not just what happened back then but how the ruling has reverberated through the years. and joining me, i'll start with my immediate left here. judith browne-dianis, co-director of the advance project. she was on the ground in florida and ever since to ensure voting rights. next to her, rick hassan, university of california irvine law professor, and a prolific writer on election law. just this morning, crack of dawn, he sent t

we had a change in the supreme court in 2005 with chief justice john roberts. in 2006, samuel alito. we had the historic election of barack obama. and then two more changes with justice soanya sotomayor in 2009 and elena kagan in 2010. and in some ways, and 2010, citizens united has replaced bush legal or as a rallying cry politically at least. -- bush v gore as a rallying cry politically at least. just when i think people have stopped thinking about it or stopped asking about it, i will give a speech somewhere, as in last summer in connecticut, where the first question is -- what about that bush legal or? -- bush the gore? but we are here to look at both sides, not just what happened back then, but how the ruling has reverberated through the years. i will start with my immediate left. judith brown diana's -- judith brown-dianis. we also have richard hasen. if we google bush v gore, i think your name comes up second. along with justice scalia saying, please, get over it. we also have pamela karlan. like judith, she has been in the trenches. most recently as an assistant attorn

senate, he voted against john roberts and he voted to filibuster samuel alito. douglas brinkley, let me bring you in. obviously a lot of back and forth about whether nominees in an election year, there's been a hearing. there's never been a situation like this one, though. >> there hasn't been. yes, president obama checked the box and nominated merrick garland but, no, we are not going to be able to get a hearing between this spring in the middle of this volcanic election cycle. republicans would rather wait it out until at least november. what will be interesting to see, can merrick garland sustain becoming kind of a sympathetic, martyr-like figure. he very well might. it's hard to argue that he shouldn't be on the supreme court. he's got all of the credentials. just oklahoma city bombing alone, which i have studied in depth, he did this extraordinary prosecution there. 168 people were killed and 680 wounded. he moved in and in a methodical way went after timothy mcveigh and the others and kind of a major figure in that and also went after the unabomber, meanin

john brown in norma's. frederick douglass was close to the secret six who provided funds to brown. they came from boston. most likely samuel how was one of them. his in treaties, they both saved their own lives. coloentally, the kernel -- who putne down the raid and capturedl john brown played a pivotal part in the civil war. robert e lee, colonel robert e. lee who was a army officer who went to west point. that was his last deed for the union. when he defected to the south, the confederacy, that did not sit well with his fellow army officers who went to west point with him. and lincoln was also furious should not that lee report to duty for the union. weddedthese characters together and have different intersections. i thought that might be interesting to know that robert e. lee was at the scene of harpers ferry. match in thelast powder keg of the civil war. although it failed, it succeeded in alarming the south and it blows. the two sides, to in a way, john brown succeeded with his revolutionary rage. -- raid. frederickbman and douglass were not revolutionaries in the same way. they were nonviolent revolutionaries. time,

now justice samuel alito voting to do so anyway and justice john roberts. both of them quite qualified. some say why should senate republicans act any less politically than then senator obama did? >> the fact of the matter is that justice roberts is on the court today. the last time we were in an election year under president reagan, the chief justice was already there. we know that during reagan's election year 93-0 the nominee was approved. this is a time when vice president biden was chairman of the judiciary committee. and we were able to move forward. so we've done this in an election year before. there's no reason why we can't do it now. >> on the senate floor, majority leader mitch mcconnell invoked what he called the biden rule as previous precedent. you talked about when senator biden was chairman of the judiciary committee. take a listen to what then senator biden, chairman of the judiciary committee in 1982, argued about how president george h.w. bush should not name a nominee. listen. >> it would be our pragmatic conclusion that once the politic

samuels are in american fields. >> in the united states there are hundreds of thousands of children who are working for hire in agriculture. john legal in agriculture in america. >> it is we have a double standard in us child labor laws. you have to be 14 years old to work at burger king and mcdonald's and can only work limited hours in a day, but if you're 12 you can work 50 or 60 hours a week in the fields and it's perfectly legal. >> and your organization objects to that, but you heard what ben said, why would a law make it better. is it terrible that this 9-year-old is spending time with his family. >> samuel is working in tobacco. he's out there in 90, hundred degree heat. many of the children starting around 11 and 12 are working ten hours a day. >> i don't believe samuel's parents dislike him. i think they need his income to work. prohibiting sam doesn't change that fact. >> their anchts are worse. >> most children who are working they're helping out their family. they see that their parents are struggling. >> take the worst case, children working in the factory in bangladesh. senator introduced the child labor act which

samuels are in american fields. >> in the united states there are hundreds of thousands of children who are working for hire in agriculture. johnd it's legal in agriculture in america. >> it is we have a double standard in us child labor laws. you have to be 14 years old to work at burger king and mcdonald's and can only work limited hours in a day, but if you're 12 you can work 50 or 60 hours a week in the fields and it's perfectly legal. >> and your organization objects to that, but you heard what ben said, why would a law make it better. is it terrible that this 9-year-old is spending time with his family. >> samuel is working in tobacco. he's out there in 90, hundred degree heat. many of the children starting around 11 and 12 are working ten hours a day. >> i don't believe samuel's parents dislike him. i think they need his income to work. prohibiting sam doesn't change that fact. >> their anchts are worse. >> most children who are working they're helping out their family. they see that their parents are struggling. >> take the worst case, children working in the factory in bangladesh. senator introduced the child labor act