john stones of manchester city, joe gomes of liverpool, alex oxlade—chamberlain of liverpool, gettingming in to replace jack wilshere. jordan henderson alongside him captaining the side tonight. —— joe gomez. front of marcus rashford, jesse lingard and raheem sterling. that is your team news, as england prepare for kick—off in over an hour's time, the atmosphere building very nicely. england's and ultimate game before they named the world cup squad, one of four friendlies game before they named the world cup squad, one of fourfriendlies before the tournament starts in russia, with the first match against tunisia on monday, june 18. i am pretty envious, enjoy your friday night on amsterdam —— in amsterdam. all the build—up with darren fletcher begins at 7am —— 7p on the radio. scotland trying to build something new under alex mcleish, he begins his second stint as the manager of the national tea m stint as the manager of the national team with a game against costa rica at hampden park. scotland will not be travelling to the world cup. they did not qualify. —— 7pm. first scotland match

intensification of arse to roll down the walk of fame later this week we were joined earlier by john stone himself to give us a preview of this much watch must watch exposé. so sean it appears that the backroom power brokers on capitol hill with hollywood allies cronies were we'd like to have cause for a little concern this year as the academy awards are just a few days away i got to ask you sean stone what do you have in store what do you have in the works to come out right in time for the academy awards this region. really is a new special documentary special called hollywood d.c. because it's not washington d.c. it's hollywood d.c. and that means that we're looking into the history not all of it but you know a good deal of history relating to the relationship between hollywood and the washington powerbrokers and what goes back really to the beginning of the birth of the war bonds you know using hollywood celebrities to sell war bonds for the first world war it's like the world war all the way through the blacklist as we know the tories blacklisting of hollywood screenwriters and then up

daniel johnstone of john stone moyer incorporated made the rescue. >> i heard my whole life that the construction industry can be like herding cats. and today i learned that it definitely was. >> reporter: the intruder tried to get into the cafe but it was locked. >> it's really shocking that someone would break into a cat cafe. >> reporter: the non-profit also fund-raising for security windows to prevent future break ins so the felines don't flee in oakland, katie utehs, abc7 news. >>> get your green ready for the largest st. patrick's day event west of the mississippi. 167th annual st. patrick's day parade in san francisco starts at 11:30 this morning at market and second. more than 5,000 people are expected to attend. there is also a festival at civic center plaza. starts at 10:00 a.m. and goes until 5:00. there will be entertainment, food, arts and crafts, and much more. meteorologist lisa argen tracking the accuweather forecast for us. we are looking at scattered showers throughout the morning? >> that's my green. that would disappear if i had green on. that's why i'm not wearin

john black stone climbed aboard. >> reporter: most driverless cars being tested in america still require a human ready to grab the wheel or hit the brakes if technology fails. but the shuttle bus making its way through san ramon, california, has no driver, no steering wheel, no brake pedal. it's the first completely driverless vehicle licensed to operate on puck lick roads in -- public roads in california. for randy, the head of the county transportation authority, this is an exciting ride indeed. >> this is the first. we're on a public street. >> this is my first time after working for months trying to get a license to be on a public street. this is pretty cool. >> reporter: you forsee the citizens of san ramon getting around? the mayor sees autonomous solutions to traffic jams and parking problems. fewer people will need cars. >> every parking here costs x amount of dollars to build and parking garages, 70,000 per parking spot. that's huge. >> we'll do less major infrastructure widening the freeways and things that mess up traffic for a long time. >> reporter: now that the driverless s

john black stone has more on this. >> undercover video broadcast today by britain's channel 4 reveals cambridge analytica, ceo alexander mix boasting of the involvement in 20916 presidential campaign. >> have you met mr. from snp. >> many times. >> we did all the research, all the data, all the analytics all the targeting. cambridge analytica, suspended mix. facebook could be in deeper trouble. in 2011 they signed a consent decree with the ftc, not to allow unauthorized use of profile. mix's admission something jes face book may have violated the agreement. an early investor of facebook is a critic of the company. >> there is a giant problem for facebook and democracy in the united states. >> sam lester with electronic privacy information center agreetz. >> users had no idea that cambridge analytica was accessing data clear violation of the 20911 consent order. >> could cost them 40,000 for every offense all. that could total $2 trillion in fines. zuckerberg's silence is disappointing. >> you don't get to make a billion dollars or tens of billions of dollars without being responsible

. >> all right, john black stone in sacramento. thank you. >>> we are back in just a moment. growing up, a lot of people judged me because of the way i look. "i thought all asians were good at math." "you all look the same to me." "no, where are you really from?" "9/11 was your fault." "how do you see out of such small eyes?" "go back to your country." i guess i wish that people knew... we are not all the same. we are not all the same. we are not all the same. >>> the legal battle between the president and former adult film star escalated. she filed a lawsuit seeking permission to talk about an allege add fair with mr. trump. his legal team denies the affair and says she needs to follow a nondisclosure agreement. jan crawford has more on this now, jan. >> jeff, the president's personal lawyer actually tried to head off this lawsuit and keep miss daniels from walking. temporary restraining order. and blocked her from filing it. and the white house says that proves the president has prevailed. her lawyer told cbs news moments ago that those claims are ludicrous. when allegation

. >> and roger stone predicted the release of john podesta -- >> he did not know. >> he predicted -- >> roger stone -- >> that's not a fact. >> -- predicted the release of john podesta's e-mails. >> that's a lie. >> it is not a lie. >> that's the democratic narrative. that is not what roger stone -- that is not true. that is not true. >> he said, all you got to do is look at the facts, robby. >> i'm telling you the facts. you can yell as. much as you want. >> he said podesta's time in the barrel is coming. he didn't say he's going to have e-mails released. he was talking about his business dealings with russia, all the things he did -- he and his brother did. i mean that's what roger stone says is true. he did not say, there are e-mails coming. you are putting words in his mouth, and that's not factual. >> you knew who did allude to the fact e-mails might be coming or information was going to come out that was going to be hurtful? donald trump himself. >> and roger stone said he was speaking to wikileaks. so all i'm saying is this is the thing. let these guys come forward. let's get t

let's get the thoughts ofjohn stones —— john sobel —— let's get the thoughts of our north america editorjonme now in the studio. is this the beginning of a trade war? sounds like it. when you're talking about slapping $50 billion worth of sanctions on china. you now have the well‘s ‘s powerful economy and the second—biggest economy lined up and the second—biggest economy lined upfor and the second—biggest economy lined up for that you have china threatening to retaliate. they are carefully calibrating their targets. they are talking about hitting american agriculture products. the export of live peaks. sawyer, one of the biggest markets. they are saying we might take aim at those, which is the heart of donald trump country. farmers are saying the steady on this trade war stuff. this could do real harm to the us economy. the most senior businessmen in america have been going into the white house could try to make absolutely clear they believe it is the wrong decision at the wrong time to launched harris against china. they are talking about the global economic recovery which could be put int

the campaign and into the period we're interested in, the period where roger stone was foreshadowing wikileaks, dropping the john legal jeopardy could roger stone be in? >> mr. stone appears to be a person at the center of the international intrigue, as you mentioned, the contact with wikileaks which is believed to be by bob mueller of investigative interest of a russian plot that's already been charged in u.s. federal court. this is the center of the enchilada. that is why it is so fascinating what mr. nunberg is disclosing. i think it would be a potential mistake to read all of this as a will he or won't he story about mr. nunberg's cooperation with the special counsel. that is not what gives it such journalistic heat. what gives it so much heat is how much he's disclosing, regardless of what he later does. as june just mentioned, he is basically saying that he has this belief that they're setting up a case, his words, against roger stone. mr. stone is a very long-term sophisticated operator. he was once deposed by nick ackerman in the original watergate special prosecution force and roger has maneuvered his w

bookable this is the vanguard john that it doesn't count thank you stone did i said i meet. watch the co they don't preserve these old clothes men and we've done well. but i say i counted. better than i shift just sit back. if you know. because those body of work was enormous. some of his works went unrecorded after the painter died they were probably hidden away during the inventory for the inheritance. that is what this report suggests by the director of the picasso administration who represents the families interests. it is likely that certain works escaped the inventory as they had been hidden by. this is the ought to be the case for the two disputed paintings. accused of being involved in the theft of the two portraits. defends himself and declares that he did indeed pay katherine you don't her lawyers apparently asked him to pay money not directly to the because so heiress but to a trust fund an offshore company based in a tax haven. called a mole jail because to understand shine the cabinet of a casion have to benefit the caribou in a community demand i mean done what

stone had to say then. listen. >> i never had any advanced knowledge of the content, the source or the exact timing of the wikileaks disclosures. i never predicted that johnta's e-mails would be hacked. i predicted his business activities would come under scrutiny. >> that's roger stone giving his reactions. you have for example, people talking about what comes next when it comes to the democratic side of this. joyce vanessa -- i want to get your reaction. >> i don't think it's going to amount to a whole lot at the end of the day this whole house working on the russian investigation are going to determine there was collusion. far more importantly as the mueller investigation, which will be the body that determines whether or not anyone is charged with criminal conduct. although this has been a flurry of news and the release of this report in the fashion that's clearly not bipartisan has caused a stir, long run this will be just a footnote. >> well, what's interesting to me though is the potential of what you may here from other republicans. congressman rudy who's on that intel, he's a republican came out and said this. listen. >> going completely off the

. >>> and sir elton john playing millionaire match maker for sharon stone?ron stone looking for? >> big

he tweeted, roger stone did, about it being john podesta's time in the barrel. so clearly there was some communication or coordination between roger stone and wikileaks. the question is, did -- was roger stone in cohoots with the trump campaign and what if any, knowledge of that relationship does sam nunberg have? nunberg has called roger stone a mentor, a father figure. and so the question will be just how much of these details did roger stone share with his mentee? >> as you are probably aware, yahoo! news is reporting that the obama national security staffers were ordered by susan rice to stop developing options to retaliate against russia's election interference. you worked for the nsc, you worked for president obama at the time. any truth to that? >> well, craig, i obviously can't speak to any covert measures, specific covert measures in development or may have been taken, but i would remind you of what the obama administration said at the end of december 2016 when he announced the punitive measures against vladimir putin. we announced a whole series of step

. >> it was roger stone, michael, who claimed multiple times that he had contact with julian assuage and seemed to know ahead of time about the hack of the dnc and john podesta. he denied both. do you think stone is key to making the collusion case? >> i think he certainly may be a part of it. let me tell you these interviews and investigations, certainly when we talk about malloch or stone, these things don't happen just sort of willy dilly, off the cuff. they basically have some idea where they're going. they may know or typically do know the answers to the questions they're asking you. this is a chance to feel you out as a witness, feel you out if you are going to be truthful as things go on, if there's places they can put pressure on you. they know the answers before they get there. what it tells me is like roger stone, it kind of tells me we might be talking a little bit about little don. he is the one that was involved in the russian meeting in trump tower. he is the one that had the information shared from -- he didn't disclose the meeting. that pushes it back towards the events on air force one to do a coverup. that seems a likely path that m

stone has been a key figure in that. if there was no real collusion, didn't he signal the stuff would be coming? >> he said something will be, like monday will be johnin the barrel. a signal that podesta is next and soon enough, his e-mails which were fished and hacked and released. >> roger stone says he has not been subpoenas to turn over documents like the subpoena he obviously got. but he did issue a statement while sam nunberg was on his first interview of the day, saying if he is asked to turn over, he thinks he will be asked, sam nunberg can say he won't turn over these e-mails or documents or conversations he had, but those are multiple ways conversations. there's even a chance the special counsel could have some of those conversations so that's important to keep in mind as he's denying it. >> and roger stone, allegedly, who was officially separated from then candidate donald trump. but still had a relationship with him was off trying to back all these hacked e-mails from john podesta and he denies it. but there's evidence of communication. the question is whether or not it amounts to anything. >> and roger stone, business partner, paul mana

stone, there are a lot of, i think, very telling circumstances in terms of what roger stone appears to be predicting, johnta's time in the barrel is coming, he says, shortly before the dump of podesta ex-mails, it would be, i think, innocent for us not to look into these things. >> your status update that you released last night, mentioned several things that the republicans refused to subpoena that you think would get to the bottom of some of this. if the democrats win the house back, will you be subpoenaing all of these things? >> we will see what the status of the investigation is, how much has the senate been able to do and what has bob mueller been able to do and has that work been done or is it still outstanding. i'm still particularly interested in the issue of money laundering, is this a lever they can hold over the president of the united states. it would be derelict in our responsibilities not to find t out. all of these meetings took place before the investigation. and we need to know have these been investigated and what more needs to be done. >> congressman, thank you for coming on "the beat.

john bolton whispering in his ear bomb them back to the stone ages he just might i mean people when we're talking about bolton remember this is a man who is still defending the invasion of iraq that killed you know those responsible for killing millions of people it's for four to six trillion dollars of u.s. debt and here's somebody who's advise in the president the present president who called all of bush's appointees and neo cons the you know the greatest fiasco on earth so no he's not prepared obviously and this is why it's going to be a fiasco at best i think china has stepped in to try to calm the waters ahead of this note that they fully briefed trump and his team as to what they were doing there has to be some sort of semblance an adult in the room and that's where it's not going to come from donald trump i think young kim was very concerned in the first questions i would ask if him or let us say the first answers i would want is what would china do if the u.s. attacked north korea and second what what position do you tend to take on these sanctions are these going to continue or g

scrutiny for what he said on that tape. >> senator, either stone is jeanne dixon, he's a clairvoyant or just knows stuff. how did he know it would be john turn to get hacked? >> there was some real facts here that make this timing deeply damning to donald trump. not only the prafgs roger stone but also remember george papadopoulos who has been convicted in his plea agreement it, he acknowledges that he knew in april months before wikileaks actually released the e-mails that they had been stolen by the russians, that they were in fact likely to be released. george papadopoulos is a foreign policy advisor to donald trump. one who wants to ingratiate himself falling all over himself to make himself more friendly and impressive to the trump campaign. and there's additionally his son donald trump jr. who in a series of messages given to the judiciary committee, now made public, indicates a familiarity with wikileaks and with those stolen e-mails. what did he tell his father and when did that happen? so there is a ladder here of criminal culpability that the special counsel is following pieces of the mosaic are coming together. it is damning

john podesta. these are claims that roger stone made mid-2016 months before these wikileaks documents were releasedstone it's important to add has told us that he own rawles mentioning that he was meeting with assange to one person and that his reference was a joke. >> just to be clear, he knew about the podesta or mentioned it prior to that becoming public, correct? >> that's what one person has told us. that's correct, yes. >> and natasha, you reported on this and you reported a bit on the degree to which stone appears already to have been caught in at least a shading of the truth about his contacts with assange. >> right, and when i spoke this morning to the majority leader of the house intel committee adam schiff, he did tell me that the committee, its investigation got caught short before it could kind of determine what the discrepancies were between the statements that roger stone had given to the house intel committee and his testimony back in october and what we've learned now from media reports such as my reporting that he was actually in touch with wikileaks communicating with them privat

. >> roger stone had remarkably good information about what was coming out of wikileaks. he predicted john podesta would have his time in the barrel and sure enough it came true. so roger stone, whether he wants to admit it or not clearly had linked with people who were linked to russians. whether or not that was apparent to anyone in the trump administration. and obviously this has underlaid this investigation from the start, it's digital, people are interfacing anonymously. do they know who everyone they're talking to is. with stone it seems remarkably likely he didn't. w who. >> too many emcees, not enough mikes, that was our problem. i think you have a working mike, and we want to hear all of the analysis you have on all of the above. >> this is further evidence of russian intentions, right? it's not just that they were trying to mess around in our elections, but one, it was the russians that stole the emails and then published them to help trump against clinton. and whether it determined the election, nobody thinks that, but did it have no impact? absolutely not. that's ludicrous, to

reminds me of what happened frank frankly in the fall of 2016 where you have roger stone intimating leaks coming out against john podesta. you have the billy bush tape that came out october 8th and assange started leaking the wikileaks podesta e-mails. it does appear that there is an effort as i said unfortunately, that effort now includes and has included the house intelligence committee where we're supposed to be independent and putting in place reforms so that this doesn't happen enabling further i think interference for the 2018 midterm elections. >> i want to ask you about white lies which is the phrase of the week in.ways. >> that's not a fragrance. >> no, it's not a fragrance. >> and there is -- there was a report shortly after hope hicks testimony before your committee earlier in the week she had admitted to telling white lies on behalf of the president but nothing substantive. your colleague congressman rooney, republican, was angry at the way that you went about asking hope hicks questions. i want to read his account of what happened. and get your response. so rooney said that swalwell went through the

john podesta. "the washington post" reports that stone claimed to be in contact with assange before any of those e-mailsleaked. but stone is telling "the post" that he was only joking with nunberg when he said he talked with assange, similar to what he told "meet the press daily" last week. >> i never had any advanced knowledge of the content, the source, or the exact timing of the wikileaks disclosures. i never predicted that john podesta's e-mails would be hacked. i predicted that his business activities would come under scrutiny. >> this guy is a weird guy. because he brags about a lot of stuff and then tells everybody that it's not actually true. for more on what this all means, i'm joined by ken dilanian. the most surprising thing about roger stone is we actually have to take these discussions seriously, because he may have actually had contact with all of these people. if someone wrote this as a script and submitted it, they would be laughed out of time. >> totally agree. and look, at the end of the day, there's so many disparate accounts here. "the washington post" has two sources, one nunberg an

august 2016, stone says he knew about key information against clinton from at assange intermediary and seemed to predict the hacking of johnime in the barrel. wikileaks release those e-mails and then these messages from wikileaks to stone leaked in it the atlantic just last with this message, happy we're now much more free to communicate after the election. tonight, stone disclaimed any advance knowledge of russian hacks. >> my direct messages with guccifer 2.0 if that's who it really is come almost six weeks after the dnc e-mails had been published by wikileaks. . so in order to clool lewd with their hacking, one would have needed a time machine. >> i myself asked roger stone if he had been to russia and his view of wikileaks given what we've learned. >> have you been to russia? >> i have never been to russia. i have no contacts in russia. i had no contact with any representatives of the russian state or russian intelligence. i had no knowledge -- i had no contacts with people who might have been go betweens. some say assange is publishing stolen documents. well, "the new york times" published the pentagon papers. the cou

his team are going to try to figure out whether somebody like roger stone, whether somebody like steve bannon had improper contact. >> john, i've also seen some folks who probably should have been nominated last night. there are trump surrogates on cable tonight saying things like i hope he is with his family and i hope this cry for help is answered, expressing crocodile concerns about his health and otherwise. >> there's not a lot of love loss between donald trump and sam nunberg at this point nor between most of the people around donald trump and sam nunberg at this point. it is obviously a crocodile concern as you put it. also i think it's setting up something for the future for them to try to discredit him if he becomes or his testimony in any way becomes damaging to anyone close to donald trump. they're going to want to look and say there was crazy sam nunberg having some kind of a breakdown. i will say the most -- single most irrational thing he did today was to doubt that robert mueller would put him in jail. if you look at the way mueller has conducted this investigation, the no-knock warrants to paul manafort, he

say in the spring of 2016 stone apparently was telling people that he knew that wikileaks had these stolen e-mails that were going to be a problem for top democrats like johnesta who was then the campaign chairman for hillary clinton. of course this is before these e-mails came out publicly. now, roger stone responded in a statement and here is a portion of what he says in denying wrongdoing, saying, there is no evidence i participated in or have any knowledge of any collusion with the russians to affect the 2016 elections. stone goes on to say, i had no advanced notice of the content, source, or timing of the wikileaks publication of any material. and, wolf, we should note that wikileaks has said it has never been in contact with roger stone but obviously this is something that mueller is looking into. >> yes, he is. sara. thank you. >>> let's dig deep we are former u.s. attorney, our cnn legal analyst preet bharara is joining us right now. preet, how significant is this "washington post" report that roger stone told two people he knew russia had hacked these e-mails? >> well, if it's true i think it could be highly significant. obviously at the heart of

necessarily about the dnc e-mails that were already coming out, but that john podesta would later be targeted? and what did roger stone have to do with this? because roger stone, who's donald trump's long-time confidant, no longer working with the campaign at this point, had tweeted very shortly after that that podesta's time in the barrel was going to come, then podesta's e-mails come out. was roger stone still working in unofficial capacity for donald trump, and were they somehow back-channeling to julian assange or wikileaks? it's a pointed line of questioning that really shows you that donald trump is still at the center of this investigation. >> so jill, pointed line of questioning. what does it demonstrate to you about mueller? >> it shows that the investigation is both obstruction of justice, which it has always been, but it is really focusing now on the conspiracy and working with russia. the so-called collusion part of this investigation. and that it isn't just don jr., but it is the president himself who's involved in this. and i think the evidence is really getting much clearer that there is definitely not

john. i'm assuming you know. the no month after the bun jungle dick a quart of water not with. my cup made of the man with on the stones from the sky was fair. to make an n.p.r. chart to feel time others to listen if. the article goes to the left the lower left the club in the left you know for me it would. if the nanny from me did go the whole over in line with no thought of how long the most frustrating truth must. be careful though must have been there with me at the field with care does. to me the magazine generally. know. that you know which couple that can see it was equal. time for the mission of the for the us put in motion. since. the. book. by the coverage of this would at best just other is book. the statement. that she made with me if i'm stuck here because yes i'm. hopeless yes let me just get an a on what but she didn't skip on so much but she's telling us from the. outset the one that you don't want to show that the whole notion of what must be done. below. kind of aha i think you've already done the job of a higher truth is true so most want to come out because you don't need a choice so should remember

mueller is moving on to a possible case against someone and not necessarily stone to be sure but against the people who hacked john podesta's e-mails and hacked the dnc e-mails and that would be very significant. >> you see the focus there because he's asking for is this correspondence. >> correct. >> that's an important point. the white house can credibly say, look, he never worked here. he only worked on the campaign early on and is a stone prodigy. the play is what does roger stone know? roger stone has been connected with wikileaks. he denied it different times. there's been evidence otherwise. and the dnc hack. if it's a play towards that, that becomes very significant and nberg could have evidence. >> let's assume it's real, why woul we come to that conclusion when it's such a big group of people that may or may not have anything to do with e-mails? >> because we know more than just the subpoena. we know the office interview he had with mueller's office where he talked about the kinds of questions he was asked and he keeps saying, they're out to get roger stone and i'm not going to help them get roger stone.

and john harwood, i want to bring you in here too, if sam nunberg so wants to defend roger stone, why would he not turn over all of his mails if his mails and communications would exonerate roger stone? >> kasie, i don't think much of what sam nunberg said made sense except the basic point where he said i'm not cooperating. everyone can draw whatever conclusions they want from somebody who is being targeted by robert mueller saying i'm not going to participate. but it looks as if he thinks there is something that he doesn't want bob mule tore find out. unfortunately for sam nunberg, it is probably that bob mueller already knows those things and he's trying to test sam nunberg's recollection against other information that he has. >> katy tur, what is your sense of how his relationship with roger stone and the julian assange piece of this works together. it seems like that the collusion investigation and ken was making that distinction between question of collusion and obstruction of justice, may center around the wikileaks e-mails that you questioned trump about during the campaign. >>

during that campaign stone raised a lot of questions when he communicate online with russian cutouts and appeared to predict the hack of john podesta. this is what he tweeted in august 2016. "trust me, it will soon be to podesta's time in the barrel." later days before wikileaks released the podesta e-mails stone had a lot to say about its head julian assanging. > an intermediary met with him in london recently who is a friend of mine and a friend of his. a believer in freedom. and i am assured that the mother lode is coming wednesday. it wouldn't be an october surprise if i told you what it was. but i have reason to believe that it is devastating because people with political judgment who are aware of the subject matter tell me this. >> he was we should not off by two days. it came friday, not wednesday. today in an interview with chuck todd, stone distanced himself from nunberg yesterday and maintained he himself has done nothing wrong. >> i never had any advanced knowledge of the content, the source, or the exactly timing of the wikileaks disclosures. i never predicted that john podesta's e-mails would be hacked. i predi

john directed. >> all right. >>> and finally, forget rosetta stone. we're going full-on rosetta bone this morning.out the inflection, that's right, folks, the baby talk isn't wrong. a new study finds that speaking to your dog in a higher pitch with exaggerated emotion can improve communication with your dog. canines who are spoken to in what's considered baby talk were more likely to spend more time with their owners and were better at paying attention to instructions. it's cute. because i do that all the time but i also do it to strangers' dogs. how do you talk to your dog -- do you have a dog, cecilia? >> i can't even keep milk in my refrigerator. [ laughter ] >> that's true. >> only thing that works with dogs is a treat. >> george, show me your dog talk. [ laughter ] [ applause ] george, just one little phrase. >> we're on television. >> one little phrase. it's not going to ruin your news reputation. just do it. everyone has dogs. hey, cookie-wookie. >> come on, cooper. we're going for a walk. >> oh, george. >> that's what i say. that's the way we do it. >> and if you believe that, people. [ ap

. >> john avlon, chris cillizza, thank you very much for that spirited conversation. seven students at stonedouglas high school tell me what it was like to return to their school for the first time since the massacre. >>> and another big headline. russia's vladimir putin making a disturbing claim just moments ago. what he is saying about his missile and nuclear capabilities next. ways to lose stubborn belly fat. the roasted core wrap. 3, 2, 1... not cool. freezing away fat cells with coolsculpting? now that's cool! coolsculpting safely freezes and removes fat cells with little or no downtime. and no surgery. results and patient experience may vary. some rare side effects include temporary numbness, discomfort and swelling. ask your doctor if coolsculpting is right for you and visit coolsculpting.com today... for your chance to win a free treatment. small business, internet providers promise you a lot. let's see who delivers more. comcast business offers fast gig-speeds across our network. at&t doesn't. we offer more complete reliability with up to 8 hours of 4g wireless network backup. at&t,

stone said last week on msnbc. >> i never had any advance knowledge of the content, the source, or the exact timing of the wikileaks disclosures. i never predicted that johnsta's e-mails would be hacked. i predicted that his business activities would come under scrutiny. >> congressman, what do you make of that defense by roger stone? we've heard about the time in the barrel, how bhoe podesta is getting his turn based upon what looked to be earlier knowledge by stone of what the russians hacked and who they're going to hurt with it. now he's saying i was talking about something es. now we're getting reporting he did in fact get advance word about wikileaks and what they're getting from the russians. what do you make of all this in terms of collusion? >> what roger stone has said before is his whole strategy is deny, deny, deny. and indeed, that's a strategy that president trump also adopts. he repeated no collusion, no collusion, no collusion as a mantra. he credits roy moore when roy moore says i didn't do it. he credits rob porter when porter says i didn't do it. if you deny, you'll be fine in the president's world and in roger stone's. you're a loser i

he and roger stone, who would later pro fetically that it would soon be john podesta's time in the barrel. here is why nunberg thinks the special counsel is interested in him. what did they ask you about donald trump taking policy positions early on? >> they asked me if donald trump took positions and he flat-out told me he was taking positions because of his business. and i will tell you, he never told me that. he did not. you know what they asked, which was ridiculous to me? they asked things like, did you hear people speaking russian in the trump office? they asked things like, did you hear -- did you hear about trump tower moscow? no, i never heard about trump tower moscow. roger stone is like a surrogate father -- he's like my father. >> you feel loyal to him? >> and i'm not going to go in there for them to set up a case against roger. >> so, our big questions today, what happens if sam changes his mind again? and what happens if others start saying to the special counsel. we'll get to our reporters and what this means for the white house in a moment. but first, if nunberg had ultima

lasted just forty six days a strongly and john landy batted it by a second and the pay would be long time rivals in august of nineteen fifty four they thank stones at the british empire and commonwealth games in vancouver in a rice that became known as the miracle mile that is two wins by far your was bannister later returned to his medical studies to become a new role in just the decades he saw those four minutes as nothing more than an interlude the delight he successful quickly but he remained a respected identity in running and would often reflect on his achievements there was this magic about. one minute each and it was just something which caught the public imagination bannister was diagnosed with parkinson's disease in twenty eleven and ultimately was complications brought on by the neurological disorder the brought he's history making life to an end a legacy that already carried for more than six decades will continue even longer homan just zero just a reminder now that you can always keep up to date with all the news on our website that said al jazeera dot com. and again on the problem and the headlines on al-jazeera models of political

was roger stone potentially working behind the scenes with donald trump ain some way? tweets about john podesta, august 21st, 2016, a month later about, the wikileaks john podesta e-mails dropped. that's on the same exact day just hours after the "access hollywood" tape dropped. every single day after that there was a batch of new podesta e-mails every single day for a month, a batch of new podesta e-mails. they stopped the day before the election, the day before donald trump won, and we haven't seen a podesta e-mail since then. >> it's an incredible coincidence that the day the "access hollywood" tape dropped wikileaks started producing these e-mails that were hacked from the russians from podesjoh podesta's inbox. there were conversations between the two of them exclusive that were turned over to the house intelligence committee late last year after he had already testified to the committee. so the committee didn't know that he had direct communication with wikileaks when they interviewed him. and they tried to get him back in front of the committee, but the republicans have insisted

stone, what he may or may not have been involved in during the campaign. after all, he sent that prophetic tweet about a month before the podesta e-mails saying it would soon be johnesta's time in the barrel. mueller's asking what sort of relationship stone had with trump during the summer, was he really not working for him any learning, was there an unofficial side business and could that have been a back channel to assange or somebody in russia. they're looking at these things. there's also a number of threads on money laundering. you know the gates and the russian businessman close to vladimir putin that they're look into as well. they're also looking into michael cohen and what sort of dealings he had been into with donald trump. if you talk to folks around trump, they would call cohen the fixer. unclear what exactly he would fix, but we can get an idea they're probably looking into that. they're looking into everything. i mean, it's just -- we have no idea how far along they are, and any one of those threads or whether or not this is coming to a close sometime soon. >> there are -- >> before i bring you n david, let me ask katie very quickly. i want to get mo

chicago first baseman anthony rizzo, a stone man douglas alumist and the cubs will host some of the survivors. >>> up in toronto, former marlins johnlos stanton giving the yankees the early lead against the blue jays. they had a 6-1 victory there. yasmin is extremely happy. >>> also off to a great start was george springer who had had the lead-off home run to help houston with its defense with a 4-1 victory against the rangers. >>> and a slug fest in kansas city as the white sox match an opening day record with six home runs in a 14-7 win over the royals, including three club by chicago's matt davidson becoming the fourth playing in major league history to homer thee times on an open onniing day. finally, if you're a reserve, beware. you never know when your hour or number will be called. that's what happened to scott foster last night. the blackhawks turned to the 36-year-old accountant by day, forester who made his debut in a 6-2 win over the jets. he made 7 saves on 7 attempts. here is what he had to say after the game. >> what are you going to tell your buddies tomorrow? >> i made about 30 saves and a 1-0 win. >> did you get an

stone veneer, a 97% return. third, replacing the entry door. also making the list, adding on a deck. >>> some student athletes got to play ball with the pros today. kpix5's john was there as the dubs teamed up with special olympics. >> reporter: it used to be students with developmental disabilities were kept quietly off by themselves, but that's not how they do it here at oakley. welcome to freedom high school's annual unified basketball clinic put on by the golden state warriors and special olympics of northern california. the dubs youth basketball crew put participants of all abilities through high energy drills including passing, driving for layups and sharpening that shooting touch. the guy with the big grin is girls basketball coach jeff jonas who founded the event so every kid has a chance at a typical high school experience. >> a lot of our high school memories are ones we carry with us through our whole lives and why should any group be excluded from that? >> reporter: after all, these are all high school students and former warrior center adono foyle said he remembers those days. >> i had a very early idea that being different is not always easily a

roger stone also previewed to the world, joe, in august, 2016, that john podesta was about to spend his barrel. we have learned that roger stone was close with the president throughout the campaign, talked to the president often throughout the campaign so it's hard to imagine he didn't share with the president that he had been in contact with guccifer 2.0 and wikileaks and that he knew this hack was coming. >> that's in the "washington post" this morning. john mclaughlin, who had a long and storied career in the american intelligence community, now at johns hopkins school of advanced international studies just tweeted this last night, as a subject or observer of congressional oversight of intel for 40 years i've never seen a party drive a stake through the process as house republicans just did. it depends on bipartisan approaches that at least give the minority a voice, take that away and the thing dies. it just did. congressman eric swalwell, thank you so much for being with us. >> my pleasure. >> we greatly appreciate it. >>> coming up today, president trump gets to see his border wal