john stossel joins to us explain. disclaimers on your videos.e been doing this for decades, making television that's controversial for decade and have you ever had a disclaimer? >> not not a disclaimer but a link to the wikipedia page for global warming. the other controversial stuff hasn't required a disclaimer but global warming stories do. >> tucker: what are you said that youtube, google, believes is so unacceptable they need to flag it and warn viewers you're probably lying? >> this week when i discovered it was on mine i thought it was about me but they're putting it on everybody's posts that talk about global warming. decided this needs a link to the wiki pediapage but this page has been captured by the alarmists and it's very one-sided. >> tucker: what does it tell you when the people in charge don't allow dissent on a topic? why wouldn't they allow a free debate if they're so confident they're right? >> they're allowing the debate. they're not censoring. they're sending a signal this stossel guy may be misleading you about global warmin

john stossel knows what it's like when it turns out to be you win big tech target too. s in a video and then he puts on line on stossel tv. youtube has been putting disclaimers on some of those videos. john stossel joins us tonight to explain. been doing this for decades. you've been making television that is controversial for decades. have you ever had a disclaimer on any of it? >> not until now. it's not exactly a disclaimer. it's a link to the wikipedia page for global warming buried in this case somehow all the other controversial stuff hasn't required a disclaimer but global warming stories now do. >> tucker: so what have you said that youtube, google believes is so unacceptable that they need to flag it and warn viewers that you are probably lying? >> this week when i discovered it was online i thought it was about me. but actually they are putting it on everybody. posts that talk about global warming. they decided this one subject needs a link to the wikipedia page. and wikipedia is usually pretty good, but this page has been captured by the alarmists and it's ver

let me ask john stossel. there is a discorrect between utopia and history.nd they don't seem to grasp that. when you try and explain to democratic socialists the ills of socialism they say that's not real socialism. >> it's not real socialism. look at sweden and denmark and northern europe. they take care of people. well, that's not socialism. those countries don't allow the government to run the economy and they have a slightly bigger welfare state. sweden is cutting back on it. the only reason they work at all is they had an underlying capitalism to make it work and a bunch of people to have a work ethic. kennedy: we don't have a state-run centralized economy which is implicit in a socialist system. sweden has been making capitalistic reforms. the united states actually ranks lower, because even though we have a tax cut, we have so much spending from this country. >> but i don't agree with you about the popularity. just the fact that lots of these people lost, there are other factors. i think people are economically ignorant. this free stuff and healthcare