sir john tealcot has been given the freedom to conduct the inquiry as he wants. he will choose how to bring his final report to the public. it is a matter for the inquiry. >> mr. nick clegg. >> it's not a matter for the inquiry because his government -- his government has just issued this protocol. i have it here. two members of the inquiry governing the publication of material in the final report. and this protocol, if he reads it, includes nine separate reasons why information could be suppressed, most of which has nothing to do with national security, and outrageously and outrageously gives departments individual rights of veto over the information in the final report. why did the prime minister not tell us about this before? and how on earth are we and the whole country going to hear about the full truth of the decisions leading up to the invasion of iraq if the inquiry is being suffocated on day one by his government's shameful culture of secrecy? >> that is not what sir john -- that is not what sir john has said. the issues -- the issues -- the issues affec

sir john tealcot has been given the freedom to conduct the inquiry as he wants.he will choose how to bring his final report to the public. it is a matter for the inquiry. >> mr. nick clegg. >> it's not a matter for the inquiry because his government -- his government has just issued this protocol. i have it here. two members of the inquiry governing the publication of material in the final report. and this protocol, if he reads it, includes nine separate reasons why information could be suppressed, most of which has nothing to do with national security, and outrageously and outrageously gives departments individual rights of veto over the information in the final report. why did the prime minister not tell us about this before? and how on earth are we and the whole country going to hear about the full truth of the decisions leading up to the invasion of iraq if the inquiry is being suffocated on day one by his government's shameful culture of secrecy? >> that is not what sir john -- that is not what sir john has said. the issues -- the issues -- the issues affect