>> john updike. when you're talking about the contamination of the soil you're referencing the brisbane >> brisbane, yes >> the issue is this a mitigation plan that is still not yet approved by the appropriate state revelatory authority. that delay was causing increasing concern by the city as a potential tenant of the property. to this day, i don't believe that is still yet resolved. we do have a mitigation plan. the cost of the litigation were included in a pro forma. so we knew going in what it would likely cost two of the soils contamination mitigated and put a vapor extraction system in as well. provide adequate protection to our employees. so, we certainly went through that batting prospect we could not get to a point where the regulatory authority said okay, you may go forward with that project. so, we would installed as prospective tenants. we had to wait for that and could not wait any longer. i also want to mention one other concern. it is the limited access to the brisbane site. it was eit

john updike, and beatty. might each have a copy and you have a sense there is something wrong in the telling, something a little off, and you are trying to think, what are we going to do about this? john updike for 50 years would do this over and over. there would be a little passage, and then we would be on the last day, going to press later that day, and he would phone me in and have re-written an entire passage. he would say how does that sound? he would say it to himself, because he would want to think how is the reader going to take it? all about the reader. does this sound better? does this sound better? charlie: john updike was also competitive, you have told us. you were excited about some young novelist and he went home -- >> i would sometimes say -- we talked back-and-forth on the phone a lot, and i would say john, there's a wonderful new story in the magazine this week coming out, a wonderful new writer. i think you will like it. he would say, really, and about three weeks later, there would be a n

>> john updike. when you're talking about the contamination of the soil you're referencing the brisbane >> brisbane, yes >> the issue is this a mitigation plan that is still not yet approved by the appropriate state revelatory authority. that delay was causing increasing concern by the city as a potential tenant of the property. to this day, i don't believe that is still yet resolved. we do have a mitigation plan. the cost of the litigation were included in a pro forma. so we knew going in what it would likely cost two of the soils contamination mitigated and put a vapor extraction system in as well. provide adequate protection to our employees. so, we certainly went through that batting prospect we could not get to a point where the regulatory authority said okay, you may go forward with that project. so, we would installed as prospective tenants. we had to wait for that and could not wait any longer. i also want to mention one other concern. it is the limited access to the brisbane site. it was eit

>> john updike. when you're talking about the contamination of the soil you're referencing the brisbane >> brisbane, yes >> the issue is this a mitigation plan that is still not yet approved by the appropriate state revelatory authority. that delay was causing increasing concern by the city as a potential tenant of the property. to this day, i don't believe that is still yet resolved. we do have a mitigation plan. the cost of the litigation were included in a pro forma. so we knew going in what it would likely cost two of the soils contamination mitigated and put a vapor extraction system in as well. provide adequate protection to our employees. so, we certainly went through that batting prospect we could not get to a point where the regulatory authority said okay, you may go forward with that project. so, we would installed as prospective tenants. we had to wait for that and could not wait any longer. i also want to mention one other concern. it is the limited access to the brisbane site. it was eit

>> john updike. when you're talking about the contamination of the soil you're referencing the brisbane >> brisbane, yes >> the issue is this a mitigation plan that is still not yet approved by the appropriate state revelatory authority. that delay was causing increasing concern by the city as a potential tenant of the property. to this day, i don't believe that is still yet resolved. we do have a mitigation plan. the cost of the litigation were included in a pro forma. so we knew going in what it would likely cost two of the soils contamination mitigated and put a vapor extraction system in as well. provide adequate protection to our employees. so, we certainly went through that batting prospect we could not get to a point where the regulatory authority said okay, you may go forward with that project. so, we would installed as prospective tenants. we had to wait for that and could not wait any longer. i also want to mention one other concern. it is the limited access to the brisbane site. it was eit

i want to thank john updike an his team for submitting that necessary work. >> when is that expected to happen? >> the capital plan calendar -- you're familiar when they will make these decisions? >> i don't know the exact time line of when the capital planning expenditures will be made. they're typically final recommendations usually released some time in april i believe and are made in may. >> so it's slated to go in this year? >> that's correct. >> in summary. for fiscal year '16 and '17, the proposed budget shows less than a 1% increase. while it provides for necessary changes needed to meet the increasing complex demands in our department, it will fund a current critical i.t. project. as a reminder, i will await your direction for the two policy matters listed, the budget analyst cola and lafco general fund support. which we will know further in june. i may come back in june for additional funding potentially for the language access pilot program should the board determine that program needs to continue. that concludes my presentation. i'm available for any questions you might h

>> john updike. when you're talking about the contamination of the soil you're referencing the brisbane >> brisbane, yes >> the issue is this a mitigation plan that is still not yet approved by the appropriate state revelatory authority. that delay was causing increasing concern by the city as a potential tenant of the property. to this day, i don't believe that is still yet resolved. we do have a mitigation plan. the cost of the litigation were included in a pro forma. so we knew going in what it would likely cost two of the soils contamination mitigated and put a vapor extraction system in as well. provide adequate protection to our employees. so, we certainly went through that batting prospect we could not get to a point where the regulatory authority said okay, you may go forward with that project. so, we would installed as prospective tenants. we had to wait for that and could not wait any longer. i also want to mention one other concern. it is the limited access to the brisbane site. it was eit

. >> rr auction will sell letters books notes checks and other things that author john updike threw out a man who lived near his home in beverly picked through his trash for years. he died in 2009 a rr auction expect the collection to sell for as much as 30,000 dollars. >> wow. >> i have a bid in an an old banana kneel i have a bid on a piece of paper. >> there you go. >> weather? >> doing well. colder tomorrow and it will feel like winter. imagine that for a day. but other than that a pretty quiet stretch until the middle of next week. >> all right. thanks. >> no one playing tonight. >> get a nice dinner. >> thanks for watching. >> see you at 11. >> pelley: the battle lines of privacy are drawn. apple refuses a court order to hack the phone of the san bernardino terrorists. also tonight, criminal hackers have seized a hospital's computer system, and they're holding it for ransom. trump talks up torture to fight terror. >> torture works, okay, folks. >> pelley: and a veteran who saw so much death get the gift of life. >> probably the best wake-up calls. >> pelley: so why won't the v.a.

and john updike, for 50 years would do this over and over again. there would be a little pass age. and then on the last day we would be going to press later would phone me and read something. he had rewritten an entire passage and said how does that sound. and he would say it to himself. say it to himself because he wants to shall-- he wanted to think, how is the reader going to take this. and this is all about the reader. does this sound better, does this sound better. and this is what writers do to themselves too. >> john updike was also competitive as you have told us. >> yeah. >> rose: you were excited about some young-- some young novelist and all of a sudden he went home and. >> i would sometimes say, we talked back and forth on the phone a lot or wrote back and forth. and i would say oh john has a wonderful new story in the magazine this week, coming out, a new writing, i think will you like it i would say really? and then about three weeks later, there would be a new story from him. >> i'm hesitant to do this. but i mean, was any of them that came forward and spoke to you,

. >> rr auction will set letters books and checks and other items that john updike threw out. in beverly picked through his trash for years. updike pass aid way in 2009. they expect the collection to sell for as much as 30,000 dollars so that's expensive trash right there. >> there's also the chance to make them a offer they can't refuse. the 45 box archiving of papers belonging to mario puzo goes up for auction today. multiple drafts and screenplay and is expected to pay for at least 400,000 dollars. >> that's a lot of money too. >> all right we need. >> i wonder if you can make money off my trash. >> i could try. i mean. >> she is like. >> somebody else can do the picking. >> coffee cups candy wrappers. >> there you go. >> there's nothing in there. >> very true. we need to check the forecast danielle. today. overall it's probably going to be 10 to 15 degrees colder than yesterday. temperatures right now 32 in boston. worcester to nashua. 25 in taunton. low 30s on the outer cape. there's a bit of a wind not that strong but it's going to continue to increase here afternoon. the real feel

i want to thank john updike an his team for submitting that necessary work. >> when is that expected to happen? >> the capital plan calendar -- you're familiar when they will make these decisions? >> i don't know the exact time line of when the capital planning expenditures will be made. they're typically final recommendations usually released some time in april i believe and are made in may. >> so it's slated to go in this year? >> that's correct. >> in summary. for fiscal year '16 and '17, the proposed budget shows less than a 1% increase. while it provides for necessary changes needed to meet the increasing complex demands in our department, it will fund a current critical i.t. project. as a reminder, i will await your direction for the two policy matters listed, the budget analyst cola and lafco general fund support. which we will know further in june. i may come back in june for additional funding potentially for the language access pilot program should the board determine that program needs to continue. that concludes my presentation. i'm available for any questions you might h

i want to thank john updike an his team for submitting that necessary work. >> when is that expected to happen? >> the capital plan calendar -- you're familiar when they will make these decisions? >> i don't know the exact time line of when the capital planning expenditures will be made. they're typically final recommendations usually released some time in april i believe and are made in may. >> so it's slated to go in this year? >> that's correct. >> in summary. for fiscal year '16 and '17, the proposed budget shows less than a 1% increase. while it provides for necessary changes needed to meet the increasing complex demands in our department, it will fund a current critical i.t. project. as a reminder, i will await your direction for the two policy matters listed, the budget analyst cola and lafco general fund support. which we will know further in june. i may come back in june for additional funding potentially for the language access pilot program should the board determine that program needs to continue. that concludes my presentation. i'm available for any questions you might h

john updike, todd wilford, director of the san francisco office of economic and workforce development, shall measure as if associate deputy director for rent management and byron read tipperary director of planning development for the port commander robert moser is a pd and peter-the peer review process started on januarythe peer review process started on january 8 would provide the peer review panel the draft master lease and a poor presentation for their review in preparation for meeting on january 20. we met on the 20th. we presented the master lease rp to them. had a discussion period today period.net all comments. at the end of that meeting requested any further, to deliver to us via e-mail by the reviewers on june 25. we receive those comments. we updated the report. we sent them back to the review committee. received additional comments on separate second did we revise the port at those comments as of the final report to the peer reviewers did we revise the port at those comments as of the final report to the peer reviewers on february 25. based on the feedback peer-reviewed re

i want to thank john updike an his team for submitting that necessary work. >> when is that expectedlan calendar -- you're familiar when they will make these decisions? >> i don't know the exact time line of when the capital planning expenditures will be made. they're typically final recommendations usually released some time in april i believe and are made in may. >> so it's slated to go in this year? >> that's correct. >> in summary. for fiscal year '16 and '17, the proposed budget shows less than a 1% increase. while it provides for necessary changes needed to meet the increasing complex demands in our department, it will fund a current critical i.t. project. as a reminder, i will await your direction for the two policy matters listed, the budget analyst cola and lafco general fund support. which we will know further in june. i may come back in june for additional funding potentially for the language access pilot program should the board determine that program needs to continue. that concludes my presentation. i'm available for any questions you might have. >> thank you. i appreci

john updike, todd wilford, director of the san francisco office of economic and workforce development, shall measure as if associate deputy director for rent management and byron read tipperary director of planning development for the port commander robert moser is a pd and peter-the peer review process started on januarythe peer review process started on january 8 would provide the peer review panel the draft master lease and a poor presentation for their review in preparation for meeting on january 20. we met on the 20th. we presented the master lease rp to them. had a discussion period today period.net all comments. at the end of that meeting requested any further, to deliver to us via e-mail by the reviewers on june 25. we receive those comments. we updated the report. we sent them back to the review committee. received additional comments on separate second did we revise the port at those comments as of the final report to the peer reviewers did we revise the port at those comments as of the final report to the peer reviewers on february 25. based on the feedback peer-reviewed re