senator john warner revered and respected and respected me. he endorses not based on party.e said i have the character, experience, integrity, and ideas to virginians -- to help virginians. if you see someone of john warner's integrity and character, he did not support me in my last election. he supported my democratic opponent, senator, i respected it then. i am appreciative of his support now. policies,e look at my i know the concerns personally. look for me in november. >> if i can talk about our president's policies, i want to return the cassidy graham health care bill, which i'm sure you support. mr. gillespie: it will put 500 -- dr. northam: it will put 500,000 virginians at risk of losing their coverage. let me tell you where they will go. they will go to places like the ram clinic, which i volunteer -- i do not reversing you there. i want to tell you about a beautiful seven-year-old girl who had cerebral palsy. nobody had ever seen her or diagnose her. she needs braces, she needs a lot of care. she needs special education. it is what we are headed for if we follow wh

i think if you see someone of john warner's integrity and character, he didn't support me in my last election, he's appointed senator mark warner -- he supported senator mark warner. i'm appreciative of his support now. i am from northern virginia. i know the concerns personally. they will find it easy to vote for me in november. lt. gov. northam: if i could go back and talk about some of the president's policies that are detrimental to virginia. i want to talk about the cassidy-graham bill. that will put 500,000 virginians at risk of losing coverage. let me tell you where those 500,000 individuals would go. they would go to places like the ram clinic, where i volunteer at. i want to tell you about a beautiful seven-year-old girl that had cerebral palsy. nobody had ever seen her or a diagnosed her. she needs braces, she needs releases, a lot of care, and special education. that is what we are headed for if we follow what is going on in washington, to separate and following from the affordable care act, putting virginians at risk. to the ram you, go clinic. look at that seven-year-old

what we have are two schoolyard bullies, king john warner and trump. what we need is diplomacy.o win this, we know that. ultimately the us will triumph, should this, we know that. ultimately the us willtriumph, should it this, we know that. ultimately the us will triumph, should it get to that horrific scenario, but it's not one we can allow to happen. we have to bring it back and find a way to allow the sides to save face enough to dial this down. if that means the us pull back a bit on their military exercises, somehow we have to get north korea in its insanity to stop firing these missiles and say ok, you can save firing these missiles and say ok, you can save face. firing these missiles and say ok, you can save face. the problem is it now looks like extortion. the sanctions that were passed in early august by the un are crippling against iron, oran august by the un are crippling against iron, or an seafood and other exports from north korea. 25 million people with the average income of about $1000 us a year. they need the sanctions lifted. be duly elected president of the un

i think he was saying i'm a john warner kind of republican. on the other side, i don't think he capitalized on the evening as well as he could have. there's still a lot of undecided voters out there and the polls we got this week show they identify more as democrats and he needs to reach them and get them motivated to go to the polls. >> during the campaign we heard rhetoric we didn't hear repeated during the debate. name labeling i'll say. do you think it matters to voters what the tone is? and do they judge the debates differently than the rest of the campaign? >> that's a good question. the candidates and their campaigns have gauged there's some desire out there for a more civil debate. but on the flip side they both dropped very negative campaign ads. the most negative of this cycle so that's an open question to me. will the voters fault them now for the negative ads. will they see them as separate things. can they remain untarnished. >> so they needo undecided to the polls. >> we wondered whether folks would be in that camp but polls show

i would say for john warner it was a series of folks talking about the good old days of congress were people get together, i think there are there two things we can do, i think committees and committee chairs need to take some of the power back not have congress continually driven simply by the democratic or republican leadership. number two, in the stan h we need to realize that most of the issues from our economic challenges i would argue someone who is blessed to do well in business the fundamental challenge we've had from the economic standpoint is how do you make modern capitalism work for not people again. most of the issues we are arguing about our 20th century issues. were litigating left versus what right when more the issues our future versus pass. if we can reset that framework on that future versus pass, think there's a new way for alliances. the vast majority of members of the senate get along at least privately agree on 80% of the issues. we ought to produce a better product for the american people the what were producing at this point. >> that's a great thought and on.

what i would say is -- i was at dinner last night for john warner. a series of folks talking about the good old days of congress. i would argue there are two things we can do. i think that committees, and committee chairs need to take of the power back. and not have congress continuely driven simply by the democratic and republican leadership. number one. and number two, i think in this day and age we need to realize that most of the issues from our economic challenge, i would argue if somebody was blessed to do well in business, the fundamental challenge we have from the economic standpoint u how do you make modern capitalism work for enough people. we have to understand that most of the issues we are arguing about are frankly 20th century issues. we're relitigating liberal vs. conservative. left versus right. when the issues are future versus past. if we can reset the frame work on future vs. past. there maybe a way for a new set of alignments. the vast majority of members of the senate get along, at least privately agree on 80% of the issues. and

warner: what i would say is, for at dinner last night john warner, when people were talking about then good old days of congress when people would get together. there are two things we can do. i think that committees and committee chairs need to take some of the power back and not have congress continually driven simply by the democratic or republican leadership, number one. and number two, i think in this day and age, we need to realize that most of the issues from our kind of economic challenges, i would argue, as somebody who was blessed to do well in business, fundamental challenge we have from an economic standpoint is, how do you make modern capitalism work for enough people? and we have to understand that most of the issues we are arguing about are, frankly, 20th century issues. we're relitigating liberal versus conservative, left versus right, when more of the issue is future versus past. if we can reset that framework on that future versus past, i think there may be a whole way alignments.t of the vast majority of members of the senate get along at least privately agree on 80%

that made no sense. >> is that what john kelly told you? sen. warner: that was relayed to us. this is part of the challenge that the president does not acknowledge this problem, so we have no government approach on how we preclude this from happening the next election cycle. in my state we have elections this year. our state election board took out one of the machines and decertified it because we were concerned about the ability of russians and/or others to hack into it. >> hacking into the machine itself. sen. warner: the ability -- there was a conference in las vegas a couple of months back when they brought in a lot of voting machines and showed how quickly hackers could penetrate the machines. we have no evidence they penetrated in 2016, but they were in effect rattling the door and we need to be careful going forward. the third thing we know is we have seen -- and again, i have been a protest guide and my background is in the technology field. the social media companies, facebook, twitter, we are asking google as well. at first were very dismissive of the fact their plat

john d. warner, for example, wrote an unpublished dissertation entitled "cross sabers, history of the fifth massachusetts cavalry in 1967." furthermore, nick salvatore, we got history of amos webber and is a story of an american family in 1956 by pauley murray and the massachusetts soldiers, sailors and marines in the civil war all provide aspects to the regiment. however, they do not provide a ll length regimental history let's look at the usct's and what they accomplished during the war. two states raised regiments that maintained their state designation, connecticut and massachusetts. the 29th connecticut infantry and the 54th and 55th massachusetts infantry and lastly the fifth mass cav. from 180 enlisted men served in the u.s. army as members of the u.s. color troop, another 10,000 to 20,000 soldiers, black men in particular, served n the u.s. navy. 30,000 made the ultimate sacrifice by losing their lives during the war. all together 166 black regiments were formed during the conflict. the larg

mark warner calls twitter is a briefing to lawmakers inadequate on every level, let's bring in a liberal political commentator and professor at johnservative blogger. this is involving all sorts of social media, facebook, twitter, instagram, google. if you look at facebook alone, 67% of americans use facebook, 88% of millennials use it to consume their news. it's important the information they are receiving. how important do you think this is and what do you think the influence was if any on the election? >> i think it was morally and ethically wrong of russia to try to influence our elections. but what russia did anyone else can do, anyone with access to a twitter or facebook account can create any kind of false act. ultimately it's up to the individual to make their choices on which information they are going to see. >> heather: on that point, representative adam schiff had to say this, about this information they received so fa far, whether the tweets were targeted to particular voters in an effort to sway their choice of president, a lot more investigating to do. >> what we do know is that a hostile power interfered with our el

john wallice, jr. barbara p. walsh james henry walsh jeffrey p. walz ching wang weibin wang michael warchola stephen gordon ward james arthur waring brian g. warnergton charles waters james thomas waters, jr. patrick j. waters kenneth thomas watson michael henry waye todd christopher weaver walter edward weaver nathaniel webb dinah webster joanne flora weil michael t. weinberg steven weinberg scott jeffrey weingard steven george weinstein simon weiser david m. weiss david thomas weiss vincent michael wells timothy matthew welty christian hans rudolf wemmers ssu-hui wen oleh d. wengerchuk peter m. west whitfield west, jr. meredith lynn whalen eugene whelan adam s. white edward james white iii >> and my brother chris selling him. we love you and miss you always. keep sending me those pennies. i love you in heaven. >> event marino and my brother, kevin joseph sterling. we miss you and love you always. you were our angel. god bless you and god bless america. james patrick white john sylvester white kenneth wilburn white, jr. leonard anthony white madeleine white malissa y. white >> cassandra white wayne white leanne marie whiteside mark p. whitford m

johns hopkins university. finally we will hear from ms. linda navlo who will be introduced by our good friend senator warner. >> thank you, senator wyden. i want to echo what you and senator hatch said about the importance of c.h.i.p. i would like to present to my colleagues my good friend linda navlo, she is with the department of medical assistance services. linda and i go back to the days when bob casey was addressing me as his excellency, the governor. and linda at that point was director of division of maternal and child health services. our c.h.i.p program back in the early 2000s was, frankly, a dreadful disaster. we were literally sending tens of millions of dollars back to the federal government because we didn't appropriately sign up our eligible children. we came in and with linda's great help turned that program around, make it a much easier process to get through the sign-up process. turned a multi-page application into a single page application process. linda and i traveled the state at clinics and other gatherings and because of her good work and the work of a lot of folks we went from one of the bottom of the barrels to w

john hopkins university. finally we will hear from ms. linda neblo who is going to be introduced by our good friend senator warner. >> thank you. i want to echo what both you and chairman hatch said about the importance of chip. it's a critically important program and i'd like to present to my colleagues my good friend linda noblo who is the chief deputy director for the commonwealth agency or as we call them virginia d mass. we go back to the days when bob casey addressed me as his excellency the governor. linda at that point was director of the division of maternal and child health services. our chip program back in the early 2000s was frankly a dra dreadf dreadful disaster. we were sending millions back because we didn't sign up enough children. we came in and with linda's help make it a much easier process to get through the sign-up process. turned a multi-page application into a single page application process. linda and i traveled the state at clinics and other gatherings. because i've heard from a lot of good folks at dmass, we went from the bottom of the peril to where we signed up our eligible children. we were recogni