catharine macauley, a lot of people don't remember john wilkes, and they remember john wilkes booth, who is a later incarnation of the same name, but a similar name. and a lot of people forget the historian, because they remember the victorian macauley historian, but the original macauley historian was this woman you see in the front of you right now. let me pull out this quote, i ic will read it for you. "it is only the democratic system rightly balanced which can secure the fit you, liberty, and happiness of society." again, you can see an approximation with the text that becomes a very famous lesson less than a decade later. macaulay is an astonishing character. i think she should be cherished and celebrated, really, in the american founding story because she played an incredibly important role. she was very skeptical about meineke. she was a great advocate for republican government. she thought the powers should be split because she didn't believe anyone could be trusted with any power, so her concerns really weren't concerns to the american patrons. and through the late 1760s in

catherine mcauley now a lot of people don't remember john wilkes and they remember john wilkes booth,who is a later incarnation of the same name or a similar name and. a lot of people forget. macaulay, the historian, because they remember the victorian macaulay historian, but the original macaulay historian. was this one that you see in front of you right now. and somebody else who i write about and let me pull out this quote. i'll read it for you. it's only the democrats school system, rightly balanced, too, which can secure the virtue, liberty and happiness society. again, you can see an approximation with the text which becomes really famous less than a decade later. macaulay is an astonishing character. i think that she should be cherished and celebrated really in the american founding story because she paid an incredibly important role. she she was very skeptical about monarchy. she was a great advocate for republican government. she thought that power should be split because she didn't believe anyone could be trusted with any power. so her concerns were the concerns the american

remember john wilkes booth, his initial was to kidnap lincoln, not kill him. so this is something that was thought of in other ways, sent a couple of men in and see what they could do. now, how many people were going to get in trouble with how many people here are mostly those big fans to the hilt. all right. so since this was published. moseby fans have latched on to this state. testify testimony by joseph booker in march of 1865, saying north was so afraid of john rose that they took up the of the bridges into washington every. all right. now if you look at that statement there's the whole time i was in the army. why tell me there's not. but 200 men within a hundred miles of washington. well, it leaves entire armies with a half mile washington the entire time i walk around and henchmen hate each other when i'm stolen, when, when whoever got command of the arm prior to that. the army. which army commander was the boss of the the man commanding the french? washington. in other words, would have been in the chain of command. i instruments of the hookers going t

unless you're a psycho like john wilks booth, but otherwise we have the power to decide how we want to handle it. we can decide if we want to let political stuff ruin our relationships or we can do it the old fashioned way with infidelity and drugs. or we can take the attitude that all of our time on earth is special and it's not different because it's christmas. not every day can be a holiday no matter what your uncle tries to tell you when he wants you to do shots before your nephew's christmas concert. but we can make it a little more fun, especially if you just got out of prison. let's welcome tonight's guests. we went on a safari and we were still the wildest animals, host of "kennedy saves the world." kennedy. he looks like your 6th grade biology teacher, charlie hurt. he is our favorite guest tonight based on alphabetical order. and when he gets on stage, the ladies can't behave, joe macky. this might sound kind of weird. when i was doing the monologue, i realized during it that you have a family which -- i guess i always technically knew was true, i knew you didn't just spring

remember, john wilkes booth, his initial plan was to kidnap lincoln, not kill him. so, this is certainly something that was thought of in other ways. send a couple men in and see what they could do. now, how many people are mostly fans today the ? all right. so, census was published, mosby fans have latched on to the statement. testimony by joseph in march 1865, saying the north was so afraid of john mosby that they took up the planks of the bridges into washington every night. all right? now, if you look at that statement there, [ indescernible ] 200 men within 100 miles of washington. but lee's entire army [ indescernible ] all right? hate each other. [ indescernible ] was the boss of [ indescernible ] so, they would make him a completely separate entity, he does not have to pass anything by joseph . believed that was aware what was actually going on in real details. the only evidence of what hooker says there, taking the planks up from the bridge, two documents i will show you. i highlighted the part. you will notice the date that encircled. it is the same day as

remember john wilkes booth, his initial plan was to kidnap lincoln and not kill him. this is certainly something that was thought of in other ways. let's send a couple of men in and see what they can do. now how many people here are mosley fans to the hill? all right. so, since this was published, mosley fans had latched onto this statement. it was testimony by joseph hooker in march of 1865 saying that the north was so afraid of john mosley that they took up the planks of the bridges into washington every night. if you look at that statement he says the whole time i was in command, there was not 200 men within 100 miles of washington. many armies were near washington the entire time. parker and heisman hate each other. what humphrey got command of the army, prior to that, the army of the potomac commander was the boss of the men commanding the defenses on washington. in other words they would have been in the chain of command. if hooker is going to make command of the army make me a separate entity or i am leaving. they make him a separate entity. there is no reason

in the spirit of english parl men -- parliamentarian john wilkes in 1763, he stood up to the government of king george iii and said you're not doing this. he sued the officers who were carrying out in effect a warrantless search of his homened the use -- home under the use of a general warrant, in some ways looks like a 702 collection of a citizen. in other ways it's different because they didn't have the technology that we've got now, but same principle applied. he sued the king and his ministers and he won a large money judgment. he got all this as a result, and he was surged as a result and he was jailed in the tower of london as a result of his publication of a document known as north britain number 45. it criticized king george iii and his ministers for among other things using general warrants, warrants that said find people who did bad stuff. search them, seize their papers, possessions, them if necessary. make it happen. no probable cause, just go do it. number 45, a reflection of north britain number 45 quickly became synonymous on both side of the atlantic with the cause of li

question about abraham lincoln, why didn't lincoln have a security guard when he was assassinated by john wilkes booth? guest: there's a lot in that second one. let me address that first one your. point of view as i understood it is that the people should vote and nobody should be taken off the ballot. i think as a general proposition that is a legitimate point of view. it is a small d democratic point of view. the opposite argument of course is that we don't have an absolute democracy. any of us cannot vote for anything at any time. we have a democracy within the rule of law and the fundament along is the constitution. so it's going to be fair to at least ask a court is this legitimate or not? does the 14th amendment apply in this way because the people, once upon a time, people who lived in this country before us, passed a particular law and made a part of the constitution and we need to operate within that law until such time as we collectively may change it? so i think your point of view is a valid point of view but it's also valid to hear what courts have to say. your other question was why

they arrested tupac's killer and i was like, what -- is next on your to-do list, get a warrant for john wilkesre late! [ light laughter ] why not figure out who shot j.r. >> seth: oh, it was kristin shepard. >> you are so old. [ light laughter ] >> seth: i'm only five years older than you >> i don't like this anymore [ laughter ] then i heard that ron desantis wears secret high-heeled boots and i was like wha-ha-ha-hat you must hate being short more than you hate drag queens. [ light laughter ] speaking of drag queens, with those high heels, you are one sow-in away from violating your own anti-trans bill, honey then i read that all of trump's kids are testifying and i was like, whaat? ivanka, don junior, eric [ laughter ] all the kids man, i think he might go to jail now i know, i know he may be rich he may be old. and he may be a white man. but oops, never mind, he will never go to jail he'll probably just do what all the other old guys are doing - have a baby, which i believe to be a prison in its own right [ light laughter ] okay so then i heard en vogue is going to be in the macy's thanksg

unless you're a psycho like john wilkes booth. e johnbut if you're not, the only thing we have the power to do is to decide how we will handle it. we can decide ifwa wlee want tot political stuff ruin our relationships. >> or we can to do it the old fashioned way with infidelity and druglity ands. n ta or we can take the attitudeall f all our time together on earth is special, and it's not less worthy of valuinge on becae it's not christmas. >> and sure, not everyd not caa holiday, no matter what your uncle tries to tell you when he's trying to getno to do shot with him before your nephew's christmas concert. >> he but we can make it all an little easier on each other and evenep a little fun, especially if you just got out of prison. >> well, tonight's glad we wenta on a safari and we were still the wildest animals. joseph kennedy, save the worldam podcast. kennedaly we looks like 6th your sixth grade biology teacher. fox news contributor charlie herdy . he's our favorite guest tonight. based on alphabetical order, comedian adam.

question about abraham lincoln, why didn't lincoln have a security guard when he was assassinated by john wilkes? guest: there's a lot in that second one. let me address that first one your. point of view as i understood it is that the people should vote and nobody should be taken off the ballot. i think as a general proposition that is a legitimate point of view. it is a small d democratic point of view. the opposite argument of course is that we don't have an absolute democracy. any of us cannot vote for anything at any time. we have a democracy within the rule of law and the fundament along is the constitution. so it's going to be fair to at least ask a court is this legitimate or not? does the 14th amendment apply in this way because the people, once upon a time, people who lived in this country before us, passed a particular law and made a part of the constitution and we need to operate within that law until such time as we collectively may change it? so i think your point of view is a valid point of view but it's also valid to hear what courts have to say. your other question was why didn'

john's for installation. the family of, admiral charles wilkes, a member of st john's, a number of years. his family wanted to have an anchor made as of his window, but to do that. there was concern they'd have come up with some kind of a matching design or something to offset it on the other side, this three part window above the altar. so there were a lot of correspondence and forth about how they were going to do this, but the end result that the wilkes family got their anchor. and if you'll take a look at the label at the very bottom of the side light the right where it says erected, to the glory of god and in memory. rear-admiral charles wilkes, us died february 1877. and then the next line you'll see a little anchor. so got his anchor. the family was happy. and we have a beautiful sidelight to accompany the large last supper window. charles wilkes was actually a very, very noted explorer when was a lieutenant in the navy. he led an exploring expedition that circumnavigated the globe and there is entire section of antarctica that is named after him. it's called wilkes land because he

question about abraham lincoln, why didn't lincoln have a security guard when he was assassinated by john wilkesuest: there's a lot in that second one. let me address that first one your. point of view as i understood it is that the people should vote and nobody should be taken off the ballot. i think as a general proposition that is a legitimate point of view. it is a small d democratic point of view. the opposite argument of course is that we don't have an absolute democracy. any of us cannot vote for anything at any time. we have a democracy within the rule of law and the fundament along is the constitution. so it's going to be fair to at least ask a court is this legitimate or not? does the 14th amendment apply in this way because the people, once upon a time, people who lived in this country before us, passed a particular law and made a part of the constitution and we need to operate within that law until such time as we collectively may change it? so i think your point of view is a valid point of view but it's also valid to hear what courts have to say. your other question was why didn't h