john yoo? >> that's a tough one.that nobody leaves happy. so the one i think anchors everyone is senator fetterman from pennsylvania, plus i would love to see what he would wear to the inauguration. >> jesse: yeah, exactly right. steve garvey? who's your pick? you can't pick yourself. >> you mean i started too late? i think joe -- two people who have gotten to the middle, moderates like me who i think our collaborators and could really make a difference. >> jesse: matt finn? >> we are hearing all types of names. i heard one poll that said it would be kamala harris. but our governor is a charismatic and well-liked guy. >> jesse: but he would have to get by the california record and it's not good. i could go over the list but we don't have time to list all the things gavin newsom has done wrong in california. chanley painter? >> i'm with john yoo. fetterman, i'd love to see what he would wear to an inauguration. that would bring some new viewers into the mix. >> jesse: i think it probably would. dee sarton, who's your

professor john yoo.uing down to florida and we heard for a long time that's a slam dunk case and even some of the friends said it's a slam dunk case. and i've thought wait, wait, hold on. you've got motions to file and serious issues that are being raised and constitutional issues and slam dunk for a president that's basically retiring and even before we get to that and have the question of whether his appointment was constitutional and two former attorney generals have felt that's important enough and they've gotten that question and smith demanding there's overwhelmingly broad gag orders and trying to control the use of evidence and classified information and the attorney slept client privilege case and the judge is saying i'm going to look at it and they're trashing her. isn't the one that should be questioned jack smith and not judge cannon? >> one thing you're pointing out and i hope it's clear now to everybody is that the department of justice is being becaused by the biden administration and we're

we've got john yoo back with us to join the thing. tonight's topic, parental advisory.t trump's would be assassin thomas matthew crooks parents called law enforcement the day of the rally. why? you think his parents called the police? is it unusual that they called law enforcement in the middle of the day to report their 20 year old, not 12, 20-year-old son missing? >> john, you your thoughts on this having grown up in pennsylvania, it's not weird for a kid to take an air minutes in the backyard and shoot at anything that moves. so if these people are worried, it's because their kid probably had some kind of mental illness, illness or emotional disturbance and they knew about it. >> yeah. i mean, you work with kids all the time, so enjoy this. they were there was some fear, at least in my perception there was some on the part of the parents. >> absolutely. a parent of a 20-year-old just doesn't make a random phone call. and i would like to know the history is this a history that they make phone calls to the police because of their, you know, their younger child or adult

and as john yoo and john shew in op-ed today fox news said, can you blame it on the supreme court, ifou want. but this was never a legitimate case brought against trump. >> steve: let's see what happened at the supreme court. we got shannon bream live in front "fox & friends" later on today. gregg, thank you very much for joining us on this very busy first day of july. >> gregg: thank you. >> steve: thank you, sir. all right. >> lawrence: brian, it looks like he actually made it to north dakota. we were worried. >> steve: on a horse. >> brian: first time. >> lawrence: we were worried that the former president was going to announce at some point but it looks like he had such a great debate performance it was just a head fake and you made your way there to interview doug burgum. >> brian: so, we know you sat down with j.d. vance and his wife. we know that ainsley sat down with tim scott and his fiancee. i had a chance to sit down with the governor of this state and bring "fox & friends" for the first time to north dakota in our 25-plus year history. it's been a thrill. these are great p

i yesterday asked professor john yoo about that january 6 case and played analysis of jeffrey toobin. the former president. he says that january 6 case is gone because of the rules of evidence put forward in the immunity case. he agreed. what say you? >> i think it is very, very difficult to do this. after the opinion came down at the court had ripped the wings off this case. smith is still trying to get it off the ground. he has a very favorable judge. i can imagine a more favorable judge. she is very motivated. she was working to get this trial on a rocket docket before the election. she is likely to continue to try to do that. that was part of the problem. she was moving so fast, she never bothered to create a record. there was no record for the court to decide these questions. it has to be sent down. if she comes back and says these are private actions that are not protected, that can be appealed. i think that the supreme court saw this development. they gave her some very clear navigational beacons to stay with him. they were very clear that when he spoke on the... , he was doing

john yoo says no. you don't win over voters like this. and, the arrogance is being noticed already. miami herald in a key state with this headline, "cocky trump stretch at the rall political rally. it doesn't matter who they nominate." this is a project that even trump is walking away from, telling people project 2025, the agenda by his aides, maybe that is not what he is going to do. he doesn't know that taking up headlines over democrats debating biden. project 2025, which you have heard about and we have been covering it, goes well beyond a random wish list. it is a effort to launder and normalize plans, by the people who really want to do all of this, and that may be why they are willing to use extreme rhetoric that goes beyond what trump wants right now. trump distancing, trump saying that may not be him. when he thinks swing voters maybe listening, but here are what some of these folks indirectly or directly tied to this project are saying at the national conservative convention in washington. >> i'm sure some will say now that i am calling america a christian nation. and, so

john yoo, thank you, always good to have you with us. >> thanks, martha. >> martha: so also with us, joining me now, one of former president trump's attorneys in this immunity case, will sharp, he is also running for missouri attorney general as a republican. welcome back to the program. good to have you with us today. obviously, a big day for your side. what was your reaction when you heard this ruling? >> yeah, we were pretty excited. we really don't think the supreme court could have issued a better opinion here. you know, at oral argument, justice neil gorsich said it's truly one for the ages, and i think that's the sort of opinion we got out of the court today, this is an opinion that upholds our constitutional system of separation of powers, it defends the institution and the office of the presidency. certainly it has drastic and devastating impact on jack smith's on-going prosecution of president trump but more than that, we're just very happy that the supreme court stuck to the constitution, stuck to the rule of law and defended the institution of the presidency in this case.

>> and john yoo describe what happened here yesterday as chaotic. the reason is they were very basic questions whether or not president biden had been seen by a parkinson specialist at all and there were no answers to those very basic questions but about eight hours after that briefing wrapped close to 10:00 last night the president's dr. lisa letter via the white house and he explained that president biden has not ser any neurologist since his last physical they told us about february. so despite some of the recent reporting and anonymous sources people close to the president who claim he has been slipping more in private and on the road, there has not been a reason according to the white house medical team to rescreen him. and they are telling us the president's doctor is telling us this dr. kevin kinard did not come to the white house all those times because of his parkinson's specialty but instead because he is a movement disorder specialist who has been patients at the white house for more than 12 years. why that was not able to be shared yeste

co-directing this project to mark the 250th anniversary, the founding, along with our colleague john yoo and myself. and he will introduce the first session and get us going. so, adam floor is yours. thank you, yuval. thanks, everybody, for joining us today. and thanks especially to our speakers for this first conversation on commerce and the founding. now, about a decade after the american revolution began, john, as americans began to deliberate on a new constitution, commerce was, of course, a central theme. and interstate commerce was a significant reason for bringing about the new constitution. but, of course, at the beginning of it all, the declaration of independence itself and the debates leading up to it. commerce was a significant part of the conversation. the reasons for or maybe the rhetoric around the american revolution in the first panel, we're so lucky to be joined by three speakers will explore a different theme, different aspects of this theme. and i'll try to ask a few questions. connecting commerce in the founding era to to politics, to the markets, and to statesmanshi