commissioner johnck? >> thank you for putting us on the agenda and we all agreed to do that i recommend or move whatever will be appropriate that the commission officially appoint a representative from the commission to the water front working group to buy behind the meter assigned to the historic preservation element working group in the category of historic preservation. i think just my rational for that is by the historic relationship between the port and the evolving historic san francisco and it's beautiful buildings and culture that it would be very critical to have a representative on that discussion. >> i think i see a representative of the port. i was hoping you would come forward and maybe explain how to appoint a member to the working group maybe a little bit about the time commitment. >> good afternoon, mark pious the coordinator. i have a note here. just to update you on where we are with the process. we have really strong interest. we've got numerous applications for what are essentially abo

commissioner johnck >> jonathan beautiful report and presentation but i guess the question is about the attitude of the owner. do we pursue that? i can't remember whether we have to have official approval or support? >> tim fry detarmt staff. commissioners owner support is not required as part of the code but we do make ever effort to engage the property owner. before the board of supervisors hearing we would like some sort of written position by the owners and will continue to pursue that up until that time and then to point out this is a nishiation hearing so by the time of the next hearing before this commission, we hope to have something on hand. >> no other questions? thank you. we'll move to public comment. any member of the public wish to comment on this item? seeing and hearing none close public comment and bring it back to the commission >> i move we approve. >> i have a-commissioner hyland has a comment with a little discussion. >> i just wanted to say it was glad to see oorkt landmark nishiation move forward and thank you for your effortss >> i sucd that motion >> any other d

commissioner hasz hasz rr yes, johnck [inaudible] motion passes 7 to 0. places you on item 5 commission comment and questions. >> commissioner hasz >> thank you. i was approached by restaurantter about security gates and putting them in front of our buildings and historic districts and don't think we have a policy on that do we? >> the planning code has certain requirements for security grills throughout the city and then we do dependent on the property time and character defining features may have certain requirements. there is some guidance there. >> that is correct >> good. >> commissioner pearlman >> i wanted to know if people went to see the 100 anversity of this building friday. for all that were there you know how amazing and spectacular it was. i know there is a move to get some of the equipment and lighting design that was shown that night in the light show permanently for the building so i hope that will happen because it was pretty remarkable. >> thank you >> commissioner johnck >> my question relates to the presentation by the port of san fran

commissioner president wolfram, hylan, john's, johnck, matsuda pearlman. >> your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item reaches the medium. you can speak up to 3 minutes. i have no speakers cards. >> does any member of the public wish to speak, please come forward. you have three minutes.3 minutes. this is general public comment on non-agenda items. seeing none, we will close general public comment. city clerk: this brings us to item no. one. department matters. >> tim frye, the directors report is included in your packet. i'm available for questions. >> seeing none, item 2. review of past events and planning commission staff report and announcements. >> tim frye again. department staff.. one item to share with you. in the audience today are members of the department of the internship summer program. i want to on your behalf and our behalf welcome them. they are part of a 12-week program that began june 1st and until august 21st. 15 are in college, nine in high school. it's quite a competitive program. there were 460 applicants this year. we were able to pu

commissioner johnck >> i don't have a question, i would just like to make a comment that is, i found the drawings the chronological drawings with what had been in the past to be very very helpful and i thank you for who ever did it. >> [inaudible] >> i thought they were very helpful and i appreciate them. >> other questions >> i have one question. can you speak about what the program will be for the plaza? and also whether there will be lighting. it seems like a large space and curious how it will be used. it is [inaudible] during the farmers market-when the farmers market is not there is a wind swept unutileized space >> good question. i could have gone into more depth on this. i think the notion of the plaza is several fold. first of all, particularly because of the requirements of preventing pollution in storm water there will be no permission to have vehicles on the plaza. that is a operational requirements. in addition we are intended to have it be a no smoking area. these are all elements that contribute to pollution of storm water. second, the plaza is need frd public access a

and see if they are available for you. >> invite them by all means. >> [ laughter ] >> commissioner johnck? >> that is an interesting comment because i know i'm thinking back over the criteria that we've recently reviewed for prioritizing landmark work on bringing landmark to it and of course the modernism of what was we are seeing today as examples is great. but this idea about threatened or th criteria about threatened, i'm wondering what else are we missing. i remember the mothers building, we did discuss that. but to take any further action like what you are recommending right now. so, i would certainly be in favor of bumping that up and as you say we are going to have a discussion with recreation and parks and i would ask staff if there are any others or i would look at it too and say what else maybe like that. >> commissioners, if i may, one other thing that isn't art -- articulated in this report. the center soma area plan will be coming before this commission i believe in the spring of next year. we are approaching that plan similar to the transit center area plan where we did bund

commissioner johnck >> well, i want to preface my comments on the historic preservation commission by saying that i think you are all aware that this-the particular designer and architect has a long standing reputation for iconic design and particularly the ferry canopies and the evolution back to the future so to speak of the ferry system in san francisco. i think what has been done in the past and the current ferry access ways has been truly beautiful and in great symmetry. also i want to say i think the design element-this is a signature-this particular design for the canopies is already been a signature iconic design, so the other point i want to make is i think the design is a key element of the function and the purpose for this project, which is really to expand ferry transportation in the city. so, i appreciate the opportunity here to discuss its relationship to us and think overall i highly endorse the project in all 3 categories that the staff has asked us to comment on. i think the symmetry is greatly improved and i want to just say something more about the canopies and the

. >> commissioner johnck's i leaned over to commissioner antonini and said i'll second with the retail space, however, i hear this is noticing not going to work. >> commissioner moore. >> we're up against the size constraint i believe the requirements they're putting forward are reasonable but the requirements for commercial including adding a second space requires the second back of a house so i have to assume it the space because of their space is urban suitable for that the desired mix we're responsible for partially we were heavy criticized for years of bringing more retail activity now that's working we have a great great deal responsibility and port that activation as we move of valencia street is still our responsibility for that reason they don't seem to come up with another place i make a motion not to approve. >> second. >> excuse me. >> commissioners maybe the secretary was about to say something. >> if you're going to make a motion to disagree we should allow staff a motion to continue and i was looking any by line i was not properly saying it thank you for that reminder an

there is a motion and second to adopt the rez dugz to nishiate on that rez dugz, missions hasz, yes y johnck, yes, johns, yes, matsuda, yes. [inaudible] the motion passes 7 to 0. no other items on your regular calendar. commissioners matsuda and hyland will remain for the cultural heritage hearing >> the cultural heritage commission meeting is adjourned. good proon afternoon ladies and gentlemen. the meeting will come toor to order. to my right is supervisor scott wiener who is vise chair and to my left is supervisor kim. i would like to recognize [inaudible] who will be working with us helping by televising this committee meeting at sf gov tv. madam clerk any announcements? >> yes silence [inaudible] be included as part of the file [inaudible] will appear on the july 7th supervisor agenda unless otherwise stated >> thank you very much. could you please call item 1 >> resolution authrising [inaudible] city owned parcel for dogpatch and north west potrero hill >> this is a follow up item for sth intent from the cities first green benefit in dogpatch and north west potrero hill approved by the

. >> commissioner johnck. >> echo everything that was mentioned i'd like to see a separate presentation think outside the box on the prop m i hope the housing discussion has displacement in that i think there are a couple of things that popped up over the last 20 or thirty years the displacement of nonprofits and some threatened they have their populations served as part of analysis please. commissioners just for your information we are expecting a housing update presentation on september september 17th. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we can more often to item 7 review past events of the board of supervisors no report for the boyle's pelosi. >> good afternoon aaron star this land use commission was cancelled because of the 4th of july but the board of supervisors met and at that hearing they passed a 2 reading the street tree ordinances by supervisor wiener excuse me. and co-sponsored by supervisor christensen they also as commissioner richards mentioned past the filling and divisadero street and the rincon hill master plan planning code also passed their first reading qui

commissioner president wolfram, hylan, john's, johnck, matsuda

thank you. >> good afternoon steve with brown and mary tell the supports of 200070 commissioner johnck's asked we provide some information comparing the features of the bryan street to the rent control criteria we've done that i e-mail address that on monday and have hard copies i want to go through that table clearly those are a markable match with the policies and this project that project has 3 existing vacant euphorias that will be demolished and replaced with bmr's and 3 additional rent control unit it meets 10 of the 13 for the demolition and a displacements in housing balance study if it is riders number one no displacement of existing residents that the 47 bmr units we provide a major infusion of affordable housing in the mission and be equal to the proposal on shot well street they pit an rfp on the street for 50 units there this is a 17 percent of bmr requirements of no up zoning and no public subsidies with tmcs that is a project across the street to the west of the step down sited the balance in the area whereby positive been the bryant street project requiring the number one

commissioner johnck? >> i would recommend we receive this information. >> it's already in there. >> all of cowell, the woman who commissioned the house, she's an interesting person but we don't think rises to the level of prmb. the housing with was significant. she was a founder and that was more linked close to her life. whereas mr. cowell was with the association some of the other points are addressed in the landmark designation reports. >> thank you for that clarification. >> are there any other questions? seeing none, we'll open public comment on >> it was surprising to

commissioners on that motion to approve this matter with conditions commissioner hasz, yes, commissioner johnck yes. jones, yes, matsuda, yes. hyland, yes. [inaudible] that passes 6 to 07 >> commissioners i did want to recognize kelly wong, this is kelly's last hearing before you. she has been a valued member of the preservation team but she is going off to i think much more exciting endeavor but on behalf of the department especially the preservation team i want to bring this up to you and say publicly we all wish kelly the best in the future and hope to see her soon. >> thank you. >> commissioners item 8. 2015--90-92 second street. this is a nishiation of land mark designation >> good afternoon commissioners jonathan lamerse department staff. the next case before the commission is to nishiate the perdet building located at 90-92 second street. this is a 2 story brick commercial building constructed between 1903 and 1904 and designed by bliss and [inaudible] the building was placed on the land mark designation program may the 12, 2012. the building appears eligible for land mark [inaudible] 19