borisj johnson defence relied upon, it shows— johnson defence relied upon, it shows a — johnson defence legal consideration, the fact— shows a more legal consideration, the fact the — shows a more legal consideration, the fact the report _ shows a more legal consideration, the fact the report was _ shows a more legal consideration, the fact the report was more - the fact the report was more favourable _ the fact the report was more favourable to— the fact the report was more favourable to her. _ the fact the report was more favourable to her. what - the fact the report was more favourable to her. what is i the fact the report was more i favourable to her. what is going the fact the report was more - favourable to her. what is going to be favourable to her. what is going to he really _ favourable to her. what is going to be really interesting _ favourable to her. what is going to be really interesting is _ favourable to her. what is going to be really interesting is that - favourable to her. what is going to be really interesting is that we i favourable to her. what is going to be really

prime minister, oris johnson.'s hear from richie sunak. >> the framework represents a good deal of the people of northern ireland. restores the balance of the belfast good friday agreeme and ensures northern ireland's place in our precious union. >> let's hear from the northern ireland secretary. >> the outbreak is at the heart of the westminster framework, the democratic deficit, restores the balance, and ends the prospect of the alignment. practical sovereignty as a whole and people of northern ireland in particular. >> before the votes took place, heard from the northern ireland minister who criticized boris johnson's opposition to the deal. >> today's measures are better than the protocol boris johnson put into place. those things he said turned out not to be accurate. he can be remembered for the great acts of state draft he achieved, or he can risk looking like a -- i hope he chooses to be remembered as a statesman. >> the european research group also opposed the deal. a member of the group explains why. >>

johnson. you very much, mr. johnson.ch the committee has published . do you committee has published. do you confirm that the contents of that statement are true? i do. thank you , mr. johnson. please thank you, mr. johnson. please make opening statement. thank you , chair. if i can, before you, chair. if i can, before i begin, i'm conscious that we're all expected to vote in a few minutes. i think it's to 21. i you don't mind if i resume? i mean, it will break up. but what i'm about to say. mean, it will break up. but what i'm about to say . well, we're a i'm about to say. well, we're a parliamentary committee and parliamentary committee and parliament is continuing . if parliament is continuing. if there is a vote called , which we there is a vote called, which we do expect, i will suspend the sitting to enable members to vote and we can pick up from where i left off. but thank you for reminding everybody that. thank you. thank you. thank you. thank you. thank you. thank you. thank you, chair. well, as you've were numbe

and he wanted that verified by katherine johnson. now here's the important he didn't act the mathematician is from m.i.t. he didn't do mathematicians from stanford or harvard. he acts, the brilliant mathematician from virginia state university. to calculate my trajectory, make sure i get home safe. that says a lot about what katherine was to to not only nasa but what she meant to the individuals that she worked with they relied on her they put their lives in her hands. so what she meant to to nasa was that we won the space race and. katherine johnson played a very significant in that you know katherine is from small town about 2 hours from west virginia state university called white sulfur springs and. we had the privilege before the rest of the world fell in love with katherine johnson. we had the privilege to have her little beautiful face on our campus at the tender age of ten because she was unable to go to high school in her hometown because of the hue of her skin. so she and her family had to pack up and travel 2 hours to come

johnson. sue gray is not a witness. we have followed the standing orders of the house and the precedent advised by our clerks, by speaker's counselor and by a former lord justice of appeal. we have not changed the rules or the procedure. that is not within our agreement. they are laid down by the house. we are bound to follow them, and that is what we've done. in our report of the third of m ebb in our report on the 3rd of march we laid out what we will be asking mr. johnson. when we refer to rules we mean regulations laid down by the house which have the force of law and under which six penalty notices were issued. guidance is guidance issued by the government. for example, when mr. johnson was talking about hands, face, space, he was referring to the guidance on social distancing when he said space. on basis of information that is in the public domain and evidence the committee has received and in the context of what mr. johnson said to the house of commons, we will be establishing what rule

johnson is simply saying that all guidance was followed. the second reason he is potentially in trouble, and i think this is where the committee seem to be potentially most critical, was saying that the assurances he said he had had, those came primarily from two of his political appointees, including his communications chief. they did not come from the cabinet secretary. the committee was doubtful he had much advice from any senior civil servant and certainly did not have advice from the direction of a lawyer. in other words, if mr. johnson had sought sufficient assurances from suitably qualified people to give the assurances that he did to the house, that perhaps is where the committee might criticize him and might therefore regard that as being a reckless misleading of the house. there's no guarantee that's the way in which the committee will see it, but that is certainly the line of the system where the committee certainly seem to be directing a significant number of their questions. >> johnson sounding defensive and combative as the he

to johnson's dream return to the prime minister's chair. did you do it? his idol winston churchill today seems unrealistic attempts to annoy the current head of the cabinet 3 shisununku and completely ridiculous on the day when johnson gave his testimony to the committee on privileges parliament, overwhelmingly approved a new agreement with the european union on northern ireland johnson voted against. but people like him were in a clear minority, this episode once again shows that johnson's influence is within the ruling conservative party. today minimal buris johnson a far from convincing explanation to the committee on privileges, which is investigating his acts of contempt for parliament. during his testimony, his attempt to destabilize the government failed, with only 20 fellow conservatives joining his uprising against the sunnaq deal with the european union. the london tabloids are now guessing whether johnson will be thrown out of parliament or not, the problem is not that he once again got caught out of such episodes of his biograph

and look at this, boris johnson having to look himself in i johnson having to look himself in the eyead previously said. the the eye and watch what he had previously said.— the eye and watch what he had previously said. the guidance and the rules were _ previously said. the guidance and the rules were followed _ previously said. the guidance and the rules were followed at - previously said. the guidance and the rules were followed at all - the rules were followed at all times — the rules were followed at all times i— the rules were followed at all times. i am the rules were followed at all times. lam here the rules were followed at all times. i am here to say to you, hand on heart _ times. i am here to say to you, hand on heart that— times. i am here to say to you, hand on heart that i— times. i am here to say to you, hand on heart that i did not lie to the house~ — on heart that i did not lie to the house. when those statements were made, _ house. when those statements were made. they— house. when those statements were made, they were made in good faith and on _ made, they were made

johnson attended.ow that will be referred to when mr. johnson answers in front of a panel of mps later, if he's found to have deliberately misled the house, he could be suspend it as an mp, the former prime minister denies that he did so on purpose. and you can watch boris johnson in front of the privileges committee live here on . gb news committee live here on. gb news from 2 pm. meanwhile boris johnson and liz truss say they will vote against rishi sunak's new brexit deal for northern ireland. a key element of the windsor framework aims to give the stormont assembly a greater say on how eu rules apply to northern ireland, while employees will vote , on the employees will vote, on the so—called stormont break in the commons later the prime is facing a potential rebellion, though several conservative and sammy wilson is one of eight mp from the dup who've already indicated they'll vote against the regulations . it's not a case the regulations. it's not a case of not being pure brexit, it's not even de

johnson seems to be everything.me minister is presenting is more of a theater than a threat to johnson's dreams of returning to the prime minister's chair. how did you do it? his idol wist churchill today seems unrealistic attempts to annoy the current head of the cabinet 3,6 and completely ridiculous on the day when johnson gave his testimony to the committee on privileges parliament, which overwhelmingly approved a new agreement with the european union on northern ireland johnson voted against. but people like him were clearly in the minority, this episode once again shows that johnson's influence within the ruling conservative parties. today, minimally buris johnson is far from a convincing explanation for the privileges committee, which is investigating his contempt of parliamentary actions. during his testimony, his attempt to destabilize the government was thwarted by just 20 fellow conservatives. joined his uprising against the bag deal with the european union in the london tabloids. now they are guessing the

therefore, when people watch boris johnson - boris johnson. watch boris johnson give people watch borisjohnson give evidence today, is your sense, looking at conservative mps in particular who not only are on the committee but potentially will have to vote on what happens to boris johnson, do they think it is fair and right that a procedure should potentially deprive him of his seat as an mp in the house of commons or do they think he has already paid the political price? bill it will depend on the evidence presented by the committee of mps. the depend on the evidence presented by the committee of mps._ depend on the evidence presented by the committee of mps. the mps on the anel will the committee of mps. the mps on the panel will take — the committee of mps. the mps on the panel will take pains _ the committee of mps. the mps on the panel will take pains to _ the committee of mps. the mps on the panel will take pains to be _ panel will take pains to be scrupulously impartial because of the allegations by borisjohnson. being truly charming, i

johnson . we will attended. mr. johnson. look at the gathering which took place on the 19th of june 2020. this was a gathering in the cabinet room to mark your birthday will also look at the gathering that took place on the 20th of may 2020, which was a gathering for staff in the number 10 garden. the legal rules force to prevent the spread of covid very between may and june 20, but at both times the relevant rules included on gatherings of or more people in the workplace guidance in force at that time stated that there should be social distancing of two metres in the workplace wherever possible , and that only wherever possible, and that only absolutely necessary participants should physically attend meetings . participants should physically attend meetings. i'll participants should physically attend meetings . i'll now invite attend meetings. i'll now invite yvonne survived to ask questions about these gatherings and i would if you could because we've already covered a lot of ground if you answer as simply possible, of cou

johnson.hen you did actually earlier on people who say that we were partying in lockdown simply do not know what they are talking about. i did not wittingly recklessly not wittingly or recklessly mislead there is not mislead parliament. there is not a evidence suggest a shred of evidence to suggest that did . and i that you that i did. and i hope that you will exonerate . think you will exonerate. and i think you should exonerate me of any contempt, . i mean, contempt, whatever. i mean, look, that absolutely showed . look, that absolutely showed. but this boris hating committee had made up its mind long before they heard a scrap of evidence. the labour chairwoman, harriet harman, who had already publicly declared her verdict against boris, wants to see him booted from parliament as the final act in her political career. now, remember, boris remains the politician. her party's fear has the ability to beat slippery summer at the next election and dunng summer at the next election and during 3 ho

johnson.you did actually earlier on people who say that we were partying in lockdown simply do not know what they are talking about. i did not wittingly recklessly not wittingly or recklessly mislead there is not mislead parliament. there is not a of to suggest a shred of evidence to suggest that did . and hope that you that i did. and i hope that you will exonerate think you will exonerate. and i think you should exonerate me of any contempt, . i mean, contempt, whatever. i mean, look, that absolutely showed . look, that absolutely showed. but this boris hating committee had made up its mind long before they heard a scrap of evidence. the labour chairwoman, harriet harman, who had already publicly declared her verdict against boris, wants to see him booted from parliament as the final act in her political career. now, remember, boris remains the politician. her party's fear has the ability to beat slippery summer at the next election and dunng summer at the next election and during 3 hours an

i know boris johnson. you know bofis know boris johnson.hnson in a crowd is hail fellow. well met but he's actually quite i think quite a shy and reserved person and don't he kind you know and i don't he kind of you know got on down at these party and passed the red wine but but i also think he's quite an easy bloke and if people are doing stuff he sort of probably found it quite difficult. hey on this is completely beyond the bounds does as we know does it. as we know he has a lockdown sceptic. in fact, i think of the good things think one of the good things from whatsapp dump is from the whatsapp dump is i think, know, i am the think, you know, i am on the side of boris people saying, oh, this terrible he he this is a terrible thing he he wanted old to die or wanted the old to die or whatever but boris, know, whatever but boris, you know, you could him fighting what you could see him fighting what he was saying, sake. he was saying, goodness sake. you you think twice just you know, you think twice just on the on the lockdown. does it matt

johnson. mr. johnson: invest in our community gardens, urban farms and move on our new green technology deal. many of you may be aware that a high school that was on the list to close, i was on the hunger strike to keep it open. making sure we are investing in community-based organizations for urban farms, community gardens and the education system. sasha-ann: stephanie asks what sets great cities apart from good cities is access to safe, high quality public transportation. i have been commuting on train and he has never been more unreliable as it is now. it takes me over an hour to get to my office. when did you last ride the train? how are you going to turn the cta around? mr. vallas: i rode the train today. i am not a regular user. i went downtown to the cubs game. i have been riding the cta as part of my campaign to really talk to the workers and they tell me they are -- their overriding concern right now is that the cta clearly needs new leadership. if you look at all indicators, the cta mana

johnson. the investigation is not about that. it is about whether he misled parliament during moments like this. >> i'm sure whatever happened, the guidance followed and rules were followed at all times. >> this was december 2021. reports of parties first emerged, mp's looking at whether mr. johnson misled the comments and whether he did it intentionally or recklessly. >> there's a couple of things that are really problematic. he's even referring to the gatherin as parties. as a correspondent with one of the advisors who is talking about how to deal with them. secondly, he's accused of not correcting the record in parliament as soon as he knew he may have misled the house. things will account quite heavily against him tomorrow. >> let's hear more about the group of mp's called the privileges committee investigating whether boris johnson mid lead -- misled parliament. one of the many compositions that oversee the work. the seven letter committee chaired by harriet harman. by convention, always chaired by an opposition mp. made up

johnson claimed to have followed both fights given to johnson. video footage of the time he was sitting in the front row, not in the disciplinary hearing, in the front row. the meeting room of the house, the general as prime minister. and to the question of whether he participated in illegal? parties responded so i was not involved, did not participate, was not involved. i have been told repeatedly since these allegations that there was no party and there were no violations. anti-covid measures, after the appearance of photographs where johnson stands with a drink in the office next to his colleagues, it was pointless to continue to deny it, the rules at that time were clear. it was impossible to meet with anyone in the room, except for relatives. now johnson claims that he did not deliberately deceive parliament and did not understand at all that he had violated some rules. the question is what part of the rules could not be understood. i did not lie to parliament when these statements were made. they were made in good faith and on the basis of

that johnson a hero or that is boris johnson a hero or a villain to you?not you think that order for not you think that in order for the tories to move they the tories to move on, they should what tried do, should do what labour tried do, which basically on from which is basically move on from . jeremy corbyn suffer from . jeremy corbyn they suffer from long corbyn for a while, didn't they? they managed quite they? and they managed quite successfully ditch him. so should though should the tories. that though very the inbox very quick summary of the inbox very quick summary of the inbox very quick summary of the inbox very quick poll and katie, cathy even sorry cathy. we boris in and he was stabbed in the back. alan thinks he's the best prime minister churchill minister since churchill and trust boris trust and thinks that boris is still a hero and he's done nothing wrong in his eyes. those are the initial feedback. i'm guessing a different guessing if you have a different view know. view, let me know. gbviews@gbnews.uk okay. leaving details in that, leave

johnson. sue gray is not a witness. we have followed the standing orders of the house and the precedent advised by our clerks, by speaker's counselor and by a former lord justice of appeal. we have not changed the rules or the procedure. that is not within our agreement. they are laid down by the house. we are bound to follow them, and that is what we've done. in our report of the third of m ebb in our report on the 3rd of march we laid out what we will be asking mr. johnson. when we refer to rules we mean regulations laid down by the house which have the force of law and under which six penalty notices were issued. guidance is guidance issued by the government. for example, when mr. johnson was talking about hands, face, space, he was referring to the guidance on social distancing when he said space. on basis of information that is in the public domain and evidence the committee has received and in the context of what mr. johnson said to the house of commons, we will be establishing what rule

johnson . it was belief mr. johnson.followed there is no followed and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise . evidence to suggest otherwise. the reason there's no evidence to show that i must have known i must have believed that illegal events were taking . it's because events were taking. it's because i didn't and. i thought we were fighting covid the best of our ability in difficult circumstances . in ability in difficult circumstances. in number 10, in the cabinet office , night and the cabinet office, night and day . and i believe that what we day. and i believe that what we doing was in conformity with the covid regulations. so is why i said what i said in in parliament. constance marten and mark gordon have been remanded in custody charged with manslaughter after the remains a baby were found in a shed in on wednesday. the pair appeared at magistrates court in crawley this afternoon. also accused of conceal the birth of a child and perverting the course of justice. they will appear at the old bailey at the end

johnson .was the one breaking the rules while at the same time putting this country into lockdown . you know, as we seen lockdown. you know, as we seen on the news, to be on your own, on the news, to be on your own, on the news, to be on your own, on the newspaper you worked for. we've seen the scale of what was going on behind the scenes. it's why we need a proper public inquiry. by the way, all of those messages need to be passed to the inquiry, not needs to the public inquiry, not needs to the public inquiry, not needs to be all needs to be looked up properly of that inquiry. rishi sunak's on with that sunak's got to get on with that inquiry. but at the end of the day, it was boris johnson breaking the rules. seen breaking the rules. we've seen the the evidence the photos and the evidence that's to that's going to the parliamentary isn't parliamentary committee isn't based this report parliamentary committee isn't be based this report parliamentary committee isn't bébased on this report parl

johnson, that mr. johnson will be able to help us out. that you owe money from before? out the door, what, 6:30 in the morning. it's dark out, and i'm being confronted at my gate. >> but chris did wonder, since he once had been considered a suspect, if maybe the police were behind it. >> i was trying to figure out how they came up with this. >> two weeks later, chris is approached again. this time, chris says, by a tall intimidating man, who said he was bobby joe leonard's brother. >> how you doing mr. johnson? >> not too well. how are you? who are you? >> good. name's tony. >> i think you know why i'm here, on behalf of my brother, bobby. >> actually, no, i don't know why you're here. >> okay. well -- were you going to pay my brother the money? >> first of all, i need my lawyer, okay? in case you're arlington county police. there's not enough evidence for you to prove to me who you are. >> okay. well, i'm definitely not the police. so, obviously, there was something that went on with you and my brother. >> there wasn't. after dealing with the girl, and we were all on e

boris johnson . he accepts 12:01. boris johnson.e accepts he misled parliament over whether lockdown had been broken in number 10 but is adamant he not do so intentionally , giving not do so intentionally, giving evidence to the privileges committee. the former prime minister said the in downing street should never happened. but he added the statements he made to the house of were in good faith . mr. johnson has also good faith. mr. johnson has also described by the committee that it was reckless of him to on assurances he received advisers assurances he received advisers as unprecedented and absurd . a as unprecedented and absurd. a scathing report into britain's largest force has found it to be institute strongly racist, misogynistic and homophobic. baroness louise casey led the review into the police. she's victims have been let down and that officers who abuse their power shattered public trust. the report found the met's current standards and disciplinary procedures have failed a and baroness casey is calling for a complete ove

this johnson has handled this.rnoon clear, but be afternoon pretty clear, but be in no doubt there are far worse. bofis in no doubt there are far worse. boris defenders out there. their numbers in the country are fewer than they were. their numbers in parliament, i sense, are probably fewer than they were. but a lot of them not of the tory, they see boris as a winner. you know, the man who won twice london who led them to an 80 majority . and somehow an 80 seat majority. and somehow they it may be as they they think it may be as they dnnk they think it may be as they drink their they they take their glass of wine and they move it across the like sort of across the water like sort of body jolly of the body prince jolly of the jacobites that somehow he might come them . one of come back and save them. one of those defenders of the those resolute defenders of the former minister is michael . former minister is michael. conservative member of parliament for lichfield. michael it wasn't a very edifying display this after

you are a friend of boris johnson. _ opera. you are a friend of boris johnson. does _ opera. you are a friend of boris johnson, does this get him i opera. you are a friend of boris johnson, does this get him offl opera. you are a friend of boris i johnson, does this get him off the johnson, does this get him off the hook? johnson, does this get him off the hook? ~ . , ., , johnson, does this get him off the hook? . ,., ., my johnson, does this get him off the hook? . ,., ., i, hook? what it shows categorically is that there is — hook? what it shows categorically is that there is not _ hook? what it shows categorically is that there is not a _ hook? what it shows categorically is that there is not a single _ hook? what it shows categorically is that there is not a single shred i hook? what it shows categorically is that there is not a single shred of. that there is not a single shred of evidence — that there is not a single shred of evidence that boris knew he had misled _ evidence that boris knew he had misled parliament. once more, when it is shown _ misled parliament. once

some have called it boris johnson's last stand. this colossal figure of british politics, demeaned under close questioning by a cross party committee of m p. 's. whatever you, this is variable and point i was whatever, whatever your interpretation of the guidance may be. what matters if i may respectfully say is what i believed to bean, our efforts to follow the guidance why i thought that they were credible and, and wholehearted. and what i would ask you to allow of his next class course at issue here is whether johnson lied to parliament about lockdown parties in number 10, downing street. no, but i'm sure that whatever happened either guidance was followed the rules on it at any time. the, the former prime minister is adamant he did not. i am here to save you handled haunt that i did not lie to the house. johnson concedes his statements were misleading, but uttered he said, in good faith that had been told by aids, the events in question were work related and within the guidance. my honest belief that it was within the rules was

we were commenting on boris johnson's socks. commenting on boris johnson's socks . boris johnson's socks. i graphs. i like playing socks. i graphs. i like playing socks. i graphs. i like playing socks . so i've never been under socks. so i've never been under stripy socks. no wouldn't be a somewhat eccentric or people who wear flamboyant braces or things like that. but i do. i do like a tie. my tailor tells me, though, that he can't give them away. sometimes i mean, honestly, this particular time on me here, guess how much this tie costs? i dread to think, well, you know, shoes cost. i mean, it is it would be 135 quid this time. and you know, a lot of people wouldn't pay seven quid for a tie, but lovely tie. thank you. you want a stroke ? it. yeah, you want a stroke? it. yeah, it's nice. just i don't get the phrase raised exactly . yeah. phrase raised exactly. yeah. it's a it's a decent . right. it's a it's a decent. right. very funny. yeah well, well, you know what? i like a tie. yes. tailored man . know what? i like a tie. yes. tailored man. i think it'd be sad. i

what should we do with boris johnson ? well, do with boris johnson? well, keep it clean, but give me your thoughts on that. and joe biden and he's got plans when it comes to billionaires. he wants to tax them more. what do you reckon? should we copy him and tax the wealthy more in this country? and are you a man? are you partial to a bit of tendency to brag among fellow men about your sexual conquests? be careful if you are indeed one of them. because misogyny laws this time overin because misogyny laws this time over in scotland could see you if it all happens. and comes to pass, you could be in prison for many years . you better watch many years. you better watch yourself, boys. that's all i can say to you. well, have all of that to come with two of my favourites tonight. you to favourites tonight. you got to wait to who they are because wait to see who they are because right now we're going to catch up with latest headlines up with all the latest headlines . good evening. it is 6:01. i'm rory smith and the gb newsroom, the transport secretary says

and boris johnson being mistake.nd boris johnson being grilled for 3 hours by a parliamentary committee this afternoon. the question has to be, he survive? will his be, can he survive? will his political career continue beyond this ? and on talking points, this? and on talking points, i'll be joined by retired u.s. admiral michael hewitt, who now works at the nuclear industry. i'm going to ask about small modular nuclear reactors . i'll modular nuclear reactors. i'll be practical. are they possible ? could they be the answer to the net zero challenges that so many seem to believe in? but before all of that, let's get the news with polly middlehurst . nigel thank you and good evening to you. the top story on gb news tonight, boris johnson has told the privileges committee hand on heart he did not lie to employees over partygate. the former prime minister says although he takes full response for the gatherings in downing street during lockdown, his statement in the house of commons had been made in good faith. he went

johnson was fine for attending a party on his birthday in 2020. here but this party held later in the day in the cabinet room. the report include whatsapp messages which suggested some of those who advised him were concerned when the story came out. his director of communications messaged a number 10 official saying, i'm struggling to come up with a way this one is in the rules in my head. number 10 suggested reasonably necessary for work purposes. the director of communications replied, not sure that one works, does it? also blows another great, gapi hole in the pm's account, doesn't it? it is what mr. johnson told parliament that is the subject of the investigation. he may have misled it about claims of a party held december 10, 2020. >> i have been repeatedly assured since these allegations emerged that there was no party and that no covid rules were broken. that is what i have been repeatedly assured. >> the committee says the comments -- the commons may also have been misled when mr. johnson failed to tell the house about his own knowledge of

there are a number— johnson's political future. there are a number of— johnson's political future.ohnson's political future. there are a number of caveats along l johnson's political future. there l are a number of caveats along the way, but ultimately, borisjohnson could lose his seat in parliament. the committee of mps cannot make that happen directly. they can recommend that he should be suspended from the house for any number of days if that reaches certain thresholds. if that were ten days, he could face what is called a record position. if enough constituents in his uxbridge constituency make known by means of what is called a recall petition that he should face a by—election, then that could happen in his constituency, and if he were to lose that, he would no longer be the sitting mp. in the immediate term, if the findings of their committee are that he recklessly or knowingly misled parliament, there would be a suspension for a certain amount of days, and as i say, the process goes beyond that. if the finding is such that boris johnson beyond that. if the finding is such th

boris johnson an inveterate liar. johnson is an inveterate liar.omen over think there are women all over london nodding at london who've been nodding at the screams here think the screams here that i think the screams here that i think the reality you a the reality is if you want a definition north, this definition from the north, this is the worst thing you could have because we've waited long enough. longer as enough. people are no longer as cross once were. people cross as they once were. people were were were heartbroken, people were furious. have an furious. but people that have an attention. similarly, the attention. and similarly, the one boris johnson is one thing boris johnson is really like one really good at, like the one thing he's at is thing he's good at is performing. and he will out performing. and he will get out there will look for from there and he will look for from every person room, every single person in the room, he's a show pony. he will speak latin. he will messy how we latin. he will have messy how we will we're getting.

boris johnson, by looking — accounting. boris johnson, by looking at— accounting.rong. you don't go to your— he was doing was wrong. you don't go to your pr_ he was doing was wrong. you don't go to your pr people first if you think that you _ to your pr people first if you think that you are on the up and up. sol would _ that you are on the up and up. sol would love — that you are on the up and up. sol would love to have donald trump get that kind _ would love to have donald trump get that kind of _ would love to have donald trump get that kind of accountability for sure — that kind of accountability for sure. ., ~ ., �* , that kind of accountability for sure. ., ~ ., �*, , that kind of accountability for sure. ., ~ ., h , ., sure. you never know. let's see what ha ens. sure. you never know. let's see what happens. caroline, _ sure. you never know. let's see what happens. caroline, i— sure. you never know. let's see what happens. caroline, iwant— sure. you never know. let's see what happens. caroline, i want to - sure. you never know. let's see what happens. caroli

with the same theme, but from a different angle johnson besieged, but defiant and.the johnson besieged, but defiant and. the express has boris hand on heart. i did not lie to the house and the sun goes a bit differently goes will's freedom fighter prince in secret mission to ukraine border and the daily star back to the boris johnson. yeah but. no but yeah but no but pinocchio clears up all the faff about parties outnumber ten and those where your front pages pages. those where your front pages pages . okay we're those where your front pages pages. okay we're going to kick off with thursday's mail. and obviously this is josh, isn't it? it's obviously this is josh, isn't it.7 it's obviously it's the big story boris johnson has his hair. yeah. and he does . he has hair. yeah. and he does. he has made an effort. i mean, you know, you know how serious this story exactly this is like the state of our nation is dependent on how well quaffed he is because he didn't even do that when he went to ukraine. you know, total disrespect for the ukrainians and, what they're going through. absolutely.

, he's not just accusing johnson being accusing boris johnson of being accusing boris johnson of beingbofis in the hospital who looked after boris johnson's, who by the way never shared boris johnson's political views lying as well. and that's particularly disgusting . and by the way, we disgusting. and by the way, we saw really , didn't with saw this really, didn't we, with the lineker debacle over the gary lineker debacle over the gary lineker debacle over the of weeks, the the last couple of weeks, the way he was used a pro way that he was used a pro lineker voice again on the bbc on sky news on channel 4. all the usual suspects and no one ever bothered to reveal that he makes a podcast for lineker. his media company. so there's actually a fine and sure motivation for him to back lineker, and that was never at the start of these interviews. so it's just it's astonishing . so it's just it's astonishing. me but if you're of the left , me but if you're of the left, money comes you very secretly and nobody wants to talk about it. they just very nicely into the old bank account like that.

johnson's comeback never workable. bernie says johnson is toast. better. wellington's scene, the better. wellington's says finally we can judge on action rather than words. even critics of the windsor accord can . it's far better than can. it's far better than johnson's deal. the northern ireland protocol. vote against it, if you will. of course, that's entirely predictable . do that's entirely predictable. do keep your views coming and also subscribe our youtube channel where you can catch any of the programmes or, interviews that we've done that you have missed. that youtube at gb news. now that is youtube at gb news. now the northern ireland secretary, chris heaton—harris , has said chris heaton—harris, has said that the government will let just late to reassure unionists that their constant regional position in the united kingdom is secure. he went further and said that clarity would be provided in the coming days over workings of the stormont break, which is part of the windsor accord and a crucial element of the new post—brexit windsor framew

and of course, boris johnson now _ integrity. and of course, boris johnson now is _ integrity.ntegrity. and of course, boris johnson now is being accused | integrity. and of course, boris i johnson now is being accused of knowing what he was doing now and he was breaking the rules and the restrictions. what do you make of that? 50 restrictions. what do you make of that? 4' restrictions. what do you make of that? ~ ., _ �* ., that? so i think, obviously i'm not -a to that? so i think, obviously i'm not party to everything _ that? so i think, obviously i'm not party to everything that _ that? so i think, obviously i'm not party to everything that the - party to everything that the privilege committee has been seen but we saw in their report that they were publisher today a lot of evidence that is new evidence and evidence that is new evidence and evidence that is separate from the evidence that is separate from the evidence that is separate from the evidence that sue gray gathered so decided that she was a labour stooge you are set up the follow boris johnson and has fed that int

plus, in the is boris johnson. plus, in the jewel, my jewel lists will be battling out the future of the metropolis. this after it was accused of being institutionally racist, sexist and homophobic and the web. your take on this .7 and the web. your take on this? i think that the metropolitan police, all the evidence suggests, is absolutely riddled with rot. but to use the term institutional is politically and ideologically loaded . and dennis ideologically loaded. and dennis macshane don't know what institutional means. macshane don't know what institutional means . we know institutional means. we know they're racist. we know that misogynist . we know also they're misogynist. we know also they're not doing some other areas. if 35,000 men, it's a biggest police force of a capital city in the world, more than the fighting soldiers of the british army, breaking it up, get it down into the community. more of that to come. but before all of that to come. but before all of that has the news with radisson . thanks calvin

, he's not just accusing boris johnson being accusing boris johnson of being accusing boris johnson of looked after bofis in the hospital who looked after boris johnson's, who by the way never shared boris johnson's political views lying as well. and that's particularly disgusting . and by the way, we disgusting. and by the way, we saw really , didn't with saw this really, didn't we, with the lineker debacle over the gary lineker debacle over the gary lineker debacle over the of weeks, the the last couple of weeks, the way he was used a pro way that he was used a pro lineker voice again on the bbc on sky news on channel 4. all the usual suspects and no one ever bothered to reveal that he makes a podcast for lineker. his media company. so there's actually a fine and sure motivation for him to back lineker, and that was never at the start of these interviews. so it's just it's astonishing . so it's just it's astonishing. me but if you're of the left , me but if you're of the left, money comes you very secretly and nobody wants to talk about it. they just very nicely into the old bank acco

now for boris johnson's right.come out swinging issued a statement in which he says he's been vindicated . he says that been vindicated. he says that there's no evidence knowingly or recklessly misled parliament and also also takes a pop at sue gray . because of course a lot of gray. because of course a lot of the evidence has come from sue gray report. and besides interviewing many, many other people for this and getting much more evidence beside and saying that, you know, she has now been discredited. the report that she led has been discredited by the fact she's been appointed to work with keir starmer . yeah, work with keir starmer. yeah, and i'm not sue gray appointment. catherine that has caused quite a ferrari has net around westminster people are saying here was probably the best known civil servant because she a lot of headlines in relation what she was doing in relation what she was doing in relation to the report into bofis relation to the report into boris johnson. and here she is jumping ship and becomi