and what the, the nixon administration of the johnson i'm kennedy administration said about how important the war vietnam was. and the bolton size was nixon by the address of a destroying cambodia. do you don't see any echoes of that? the truth is it is always difficult to tell whether wars one it's trust or not when it was one that is in the american interest to fight with that. and that is an issue that has to be faced to resume every case. but the fact that one concludes that the via, the more was not just for reason i don't, well, we can win because we run the wrong side. does not mean that ukrainian war is the one that we can read. and there's not a trust for the may be that it's also around just more because you asked separately about each more. and it's not the case that no worries, no worries friday. hey, that's not the case. there rewards for slightly. so each one has to be taken on its own merits, of course, of course. but then we now have the revelations of the c. i a had bases in ukraine ahead of time. we have the cool about victoria newland talking to jeffrey pos. what was ha

so if you're johnson why would you prefer nixon why would this make sense? well, a lot democrats in johnson's own party were pledging to get out of vietnam within six months sort of to withdrawal to end the war and pull troops out. johnson feared he would be the first president to be blamed to lose, to lose a war, and he didn't want that part. he felt a lot stronger on the domestic part of his legacy. the great society rights voting act, the the lbj used to sell a t shirt. i think it still does in the in the gift shop when you leave it has just these words over the front and back of the shirt and look carefully. it's the name of all the legislation that was passed, you know, during the great society whether it be the environment, whether it be education, it be higher education or public schools or medicaid and medicare. i mean, the range of legislation was was unprecedented and really terms of quantity had surpassed even fdr as new deal. i mean, johnson think felt that his only johnson could set a goal this high that as president he wanted to complete not onl

what do us, president johnson nixon, kenton obama, and by new 11 coming well, they have blood on their hands, a track record of death and destruction through in dimension in countries such as we have done bangladesh, cambodia, argentina, julia, palestine. you haven't, syria rock have got a sound focused on libya, somalia, so done. that's just naming a few between them. they're responsible for millions of debts around the world, and it continues today is incumbent president joe biden scheduled to meet with the prime minister bureau.

weeks alone . joining me now from washington dc as an official who served in the obama clinton nixon, johnson and kennedy administrations. he was director of the task was to produce the pentagon papers that exposed us in dimension and be at the.

now we'll be back on monday with the us official who worked for obama clinton nixon, johnson and kennedy administrations. until then keep in touch, why will i social media of its own sense of your country and drawing channel going on? they were on tv, hon dot com. don't you know that besides of going underground seem under the oh, when i was wrong? just don't you have to safe house because after kids and engagement equals the trail, when so many find themselves boils, the parts we choose to look so common ground the the, the previous one says we will lose each kilogram and any sort of separate shift. so are you doing that experience for the rest hold on one of the.

weeks alone. joining me now for most of the dc as an official who served in the obama clinton nixon, johnson and kennedy administration team is director of the task was to produce the pentagon papers that exposed us in, dimension in the, at the it was the late daniel as well, you can watch our studio interview with him on going underground on rumble. who famously leaks impending defeats in vietnam. doctor martin helper and is currently the advisory council chair of advocacy group j straight a. thank you so much dr. albert bye, right. coming on, you know, it's more than 5 years since british authorities captured julian, the sons in london because they are interviews with him and one of his grades of support as was daniels bag. the late down those book like understand was your friend to see was, you know, before we go to the, of the current state of, well, the terrible state of the world. give me just remind us of how many, perhaps millions of lives you. and then in a way to gather, saved in the fall of rainbow china, it's very odd to the traders account that we receive, depending on the paper

weeks alone. joining me now for most of the dc as an official who served in the obama clinton nixon, johnson and kennedy administration. he was director of the task was to produce the pentagon papers that exposed us intervention in the, at the it was the late done eligible. you can watch us to do interview with them on going on the ground on rumble. who are famous, unique impending defeats in vietnam, dr. martin helper and is currently the advisory council chair of advocacy group j st. a. thank you so much, dr. albert bye, right. coming on, you know, it's more than 5 years since british authorities captured julian. his sons in london because they are interviews with him and one of his greatest supporters was daniels bag. the late down those book, like i said, was your friend to see was, you know, before we go to the, into the current state of the world. terrible state of the world, give me just remind us of how many, perhaps millions of lives you and then in a way together saved in the former endo china. it's very hard to the trainers to count the you reset, depending on the papers itself. y

now we'll be back on monday with the us official who worked for obama clinton nixon, johnson and kennedy administrations. until then keep in touch, why will i social media if it's on sense of your country? and i draw a channel going on, they were on tv, hon dot com. don't you know that besides of going underground, see you monday, the and the world's largest democracy votes. the rest of the planet watches in an emerging multi polar world. india's voice matters. but who will be the power behind watches, almost 1000000000 people decide and billions more, react, the no one else seemed wrong. just the safe house to conduct the application and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves will support. we choose to look for common ground, the of the managers to try to move things over to deal with the we need to go with the opinion . most people the.

now we'll be back on monday with the us official who worked for obama clinton nixon, johnson and kennedy administrations. until then keep in touch, why will i social media if it's on the 10th of your country and i draw a channel going on. they were on tv, hon dot com, don't you know that besides of going underground, see you monday, the, [000:00:00;00] the headlines of this hour of bully of a rock is like it's out of the nice guy as lebanon says a lot lashes out. so it is well bias and made so it could ation about possible even really. and it's how the ation for the recent idea of like on the one of it's considered the russian orthodox church. baptizes thousands of preston's and the east african nation of malawi, studio visits, part textbook, fines, and lost those for disney inside with the after the powers and struggles to retain influences full of colonies. and even in your i would like to say the following 12 west and tony, you have raised the most of this activity is no longer limited to ukraine.

now, we'll be back on monday with the us official who worked for obama clinton nixon, johnson and kennedy administrations. until then, keep in touch, why will i social media if it's on sense, if you'll country and i've drawn channel going on, they run tv hon, they'll come to it, you know, the episodes of going underground. so you monday, the, [000:00:00;00] the the, what is part of the, the employee would post that isn't the defense you of us and that in the word part is it something deeper, more complex might be present. let's stop without collision. is that spelled out of or the headlines on all to international as a russian and find some gain, some events, some in the past most coast troops taking the key vintage a part of a moist craig, that is in the donuts for public. iranian it's federal forces sees upholstered keys, registered the condo ship, knew the strait appointment was saying, it's linked to his rail. question is what it's called all the time. we would just wind under water and no one knows when we'll eat and we continue reporting from central russia when not continue in the

now we'll be back on monday with the us official who worked for obama clinton nixon, johnson and kennedy administrations. until then, keep in touch, why will i social media if it's on the 10th of we'll come through and have drawn channel going on. they run tv hon, they'll come to it. you know the episodes of going underground see monday, the the most, i for the business. and you agree in the 3 of the daily shows . i know mary comes green. we'll just go through this discussion of curriculum for those who are looking for to angelo stuff. section sure ruckel even was not i'm sure of the different student in full, which of course and yet usually throw in the probably just a moment that was true. i wish if it was just the or that was sent to you yesterday as to the top 3 yours man. i'm looking at these studies, 1st opinion for to flourish to, for me to on, on, on the if we can, we can load it mostly just some of the posted sustainable for a moment because a new way to box or do school culture or i don't know which these are do i know for the don't know is i can do given the other than that we

now we'll be back on monday with the us official who worked for obama clinton nixon, johnson and kennedy administrations. until then keep in touch, why will i social media if it's nonsense of your country? and i draw a channel going on, they were on tv, hon dot com. don't you know that besides of going underground see you monday. the what is part of the, the employee would post good isn't the defense you of us and that in the word part, is it something deeper, more complex might be present there? let's stop without pieces. let's go out of is known in vietnam, the american war, the vietnam war lost its almost 2 decades and dragged in numerous countries. not any time between now and then you don't see it now. wow. it's all on the empty . hundreds of thousands of american troops was sent to the country to bank the south vietnamese on me. i got that not meant to supply the american soldiers limited resistors. most of us like the down entire villages and spread dangerous chemicals. and li bye. all right. did the americans ever fully acknowledge what they did on the, via the means? veterans re

weeks alone. joining me now for most of the dc as an official who served in the obama clinton nixon johnson.

time had him interact and converse with presidents or should i say former senators, kennedy, johnson, and nixonear, those depictions did not require the consent of their heirs and it would grant heirs or corporate successors the ability to censor portrayals they don't like which would violate the first amendment. in my written testimony, i detailed specific suggestions we have for improving the no fakes draft so it addresses real harms without encroaching on first amendment rights. here, i will highlight four points. first, getting the statutory exemptions right is crucial and i want to thank the drafters for getting much of the way there. those exemptions give filmmakers the clarity and certainty they need to determine whether to move forward with spending tens of millions or hundreds of millions of dollars on a movie or tv series if the statutory exceptions are not adequate, some producers will simply not proceed with their projects. a classic chilling effect that the first amendment does not allow. second, the bill should pre- empt state laws that regulate the use of digital replicas in expr

franklin roosevelt started it, eisenhower accelerated it, lyndon johnson was on board and so was richard nixon. there was a bipartisan sense we should industrialize the countryside, at the expense of places like detroit and cleveland who are seeing the manufacturing operations leave in those same years. peter: you use a couple of examples. the gm plant in ohio and also the honda plant which has been very successful in marysville, ohio. steven: yep. let's back up for the viewers. honda opened its first manufacturing plant in central ohio in what was a tiny place called marysville in the late 1970's. then they moved into automobiles. they started with cycles. then honda created satellite supplier factories that feed into the central assembling plant in marysville. all of those places around ohio are also in tiny locations. honda keeps ohio as the second most important state in auto manufacturing but it is not an urban phenomenon anymore, it is a phenomenon of the countryside. one thing i discovered doing the book was that honda's engine plant is in a town called anna -- ana, ohio. there were mor

johnson discuss this broad immunity principle. >> what was up with the pardon for president nixon? if everybody thought that presidents couldn't be prosecuted, what was that about? >> he was under investigation for private and conduct and official acts. the president since president grant's carriage riding incident everyone has understood the president could be prosecuted in -- >> there does seem to be some common ground between you and your colleague on the other side that no man is above the law and that the president can be prosecuted after he leaves office for his private conduct. is that right? >> we agree with that. >> and then the question becomes, as we've been exploring today about how to segregate private from official conduct that may or may not enjoy some immunity and i'm sure we'll spend a lot of time exploring that. but the d.c. circuit in blazing game, the chief judge there joined by the panel expressed some views about how to segregate private conduct, for which no man is above the law, from official acts. do you have any thoughts about the test that they came up wi

then you got stevenson, you got johnson, you got a whole different dynamic there against, nixon. and so i just give the credit in the world to these folks who you'll read about in the book, hopefully some you are familiar with, of course, pat lucey and philip nash among them, ivan benjamin, the mayor of madison. but a lot of the folks live in wisconsin, a journalist from milwaukee. there's a great story. i'll very briefly share it. it's one of my favorites. and we want to share the whole tonight. but there's a the state architect at the time named carol yassky. he wasn't a big supporter, but he had this incredible moment where kennedy's in the same hotel when the state architects are having their big dinner. and carol yassky was kind of the emcee for the night. and he here is by way of the mayor i've been in that kennedy's in the hotel chrissy a quick hello to the architects and he says well sure bring them on down here. so here comes jfk very regal jackie's there and he's about to introduce john f kennedy and he goes, ladies and gentlemen, i'm very excited to introduce you to th

so it wasn't, you know, nixon necessarily at that point, but i mean, nixon and lyndon johnson both used the fbi to surveil their opponents. so that was cheating. yeah. yeah. so that. yeah. too. yeah. i have been i mean, i'm not old enough to have been an opposition researcher during my grandparents time, but i have been an opposition researcher for the democratic party since 2012, when i was kind of the middle man in the deal to bring the. 47% video public during the obama's reelection against mitt romney and. you know, i was doing it as a hobby at the time, but then after that, you know, got really big, i was able to turn it into a career which was which is fun. it's nice to be able to put your user hobby as your career and actually make money on doing it all right. but i do want to stress, like i said before, opposition research gets a bad name. and the reason why they get a bad name is because our job is to dig up the information. then we give that information to campaigns and then they do dirty stuff with it. so it's their fault that the information is just information. yeah. so in

johnson. you ended up getting nixon. later on, people did not like al gore. you end up getting george w.ush. both have problems with the clintons. did not support hillary. you ended up a trump. if you look at the combined appointments of george w. and trump, the supreme court would be eight democratic appointments to one republican. most of the things we are talking about in the area of women's rights and affirmative action when not even be an issue. host: with the vice president visiting so many times and the atlanta journal-constitution saying it is to shore up support among black voters, what you make of all that in light of everything you said? caller: there needs to be more outreach from democrats. i think there needs to be more education in the community about what the biden administration does. i think this has been a -- to consider voting for trump is absolute insanity. here is a man who's administration was made up of people who are white supremacists, were doing nazi salutes after he won. host: who was that? caller: there were videos on c-span. host: if you wanted to clarify th

nixon, donald jailhouse trump. >> let's hear from george, george is in ohio. republican line on rating the speakership of mike johnson. george in ohio, go ahead. >> well, first of all i would like to say, you know, you should have cut that previous caller off because he's calling the people names. you know. that shouldn't be condoned by your network. but i think johnson, he's doing a good job. the thing about what's going on with the country, we need to look at what's going on. you know, marjorie taylor greene, is she really far right? you know, it's a hard road to travel when you look at the democrats. why don't you look at the democratic party and look at the senators who vote all except manchin sometimes unson. >> when you say the speaker is doing a good job, how do you rate that? >> he had a take over an emergency case where mccarthy resigned, but the thing about the budget and marjorie taylor greene does make a point. when you're giving 200 million dollars to the fbi for head quarters, what the fbi is doing, not a decent job and now talking about a threat from homeland security. we've got homeland security, but

johnson discussed the broad community principle. >> what was up with that pardon for president nixon? if everybody thought presidents couldn't be prosecuted, what was that about? >> he was under investigation for private and public conduct at the times, official act and private conduct. >> same with donald trump. exactly the same. later in the hearing, justice jackson imagined what could happen if the supreme court gives presidents even more legal protection than they have now. >> if someone with those kinds of powers, the most powerful person in the world, with the greatest amount of authority could go into office knowing that there would be no potential penalty for committing crimes, i am trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning the oval office and the seat of criminal activity in this country. if the potential for criminal likability is taken off the table, wouldn't there be a significant risk that future presidents would be emboldened to commit crimes with abandon while they are in office? presidents from the beginning of time have understood that that is a possi

marbury against madison, mississippi against johnson discuss this broad immunity principle -- >> so what was up with the pardon for president nixon? if everybody thought that presidents couldn't be prosecuted, then what was that about? >> well, he was under investigation for private and public conduct at the time, official acts and private conduct, and i think everyone has properly understood that the president since like president grant's carriage riding incident, everyone has understood that the president could be prosecuted -- >> counsel on that score, there does seem to be some common ground between you and your colleague on the other side that no man's above the law and that the president can be prosecuted after he leaves office for his private conduct, is that right? >> we agree with that. >> and then the question becomes as we've been exploring here today a little bit about how to segregate private from official conduct that may or may not enjoy some immunity, and i'm sure we're going to spend a lot of time exploring that, but the d.c. circuit in blazing game, chief judge there joined by the panel expressed some views abou

nixon, donald jailhouse trump. host: let's hear from george in ohio, republican line on rating the speakership of mike johnson.eorge, go ahead. caller: first of all, you should have cut that previous caller off because he is calling people names. that should not be condoned by your network. i think johnson is doing a good job. the thing about what is going on with the country, we need to look at what is going on. marjorie taylor greene, is she really far right? it is a hard road to travel when you look at the democrats. why don't you look at the democratic party and the get all the senators who vote all -- except mention sometimes -- in unison? host: when you say the speaker is doing a good job specifically, how do you rate that? caller: he had to take over an emergency case when mccarthy resigned, but the thing about the budget, marjorie taylor greene makes a point, when you are getting $200 million to the fbi for new headquarters, look what they are doing. they are not even doing a decent job. now they're talking about a threat from homeland security. we have homeland security, but we are letting 8 million t

nixon presidency. his primary focus, especially ways to improve the welfare system and change it into a program that could actually help lift people out of poverty. >> he's trying to get johnson and racism. >> the insight that he had, was we have to go beyond civil rights legislation, to address the accumulative effects of chronic, racial, and economic subordination. what he was saying was that we need to move beyond issues of liberty and address issues of equality. >> johnson incorporates that thought into one of the most important addresses any president has ever given. >> freedom is not enough. you do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by change, and liberate him, bringing up to the starting line of the race and say, you are free to compete with all the others, and still, just believe that you have been completely fair. >> this is the core of the liberal anthem that lbj stood for. >> i remember listening very carefully to president johnson's speech at harvard university in 1965 and i said, you know, this resonates with me. it was based on that report. >> one of the reasons, was the document was never meant for public perusal. it's written in a bombastic way

richard nixon was known for his approach to the opposition in a toxic way. you have had democratic presidents also. lyndon johnsonhe most negative and effective negative ads we have ever had before or since, the famous daisy add portraying berry goldwater 1960's for as a warmonger. -- barry goldwater in 1964 as a warmonger. we have had influencers all throughout history. it goes back to a fellow named james callender who was the first character assassin in our politics. he broke the story about thomas jefferson having an affair and fathering children with a slave on his plantation. it turns out he was right. he was pilloried by jefferson's supporters for promoting this salacious story. as i said, dna evidence and other things have shown he was correct all of those years ago. host: you make specific reference to donald trump. on his critics, especially the washington establishment and the mainstream media he created a cult of personality built upon allegiance to him and his brand of destructive politics. he was the ultimate contrarian and created the most negative u.s. presidency in history. that is quite the clai

richard nixon was known for his approach to the opposition in a toxic way. you have had democratic presidents also. lyndon johnsonhe most negative and effective negative ads we have ever had before or since, the famous daisy add portraying berry goldwater 1960's for as a warmonger. -- barry goldwater in 1964 as a warmonger. we have had influencers all throughout history. it goes back to a fellow named james callender who was the first character assassin in our politics. he broke the story about thomas jefferson having an affair and fathering children with a slave on his plantation. it turns out he was right. he was pilloried by jefferson's supporters for promoting this salacious story. as i said, dna evidence and other things have shown he was correct all of those years ago. host: you make specific reference to donald trump. on his critics, especially the washington establishment and the mainstream media he created a cult of personality built upon allegiance to him and his brand of destructive politics. he was the ultimate contrarian and created the most negative u.s. presidency in history. that is quite the clai

against madison mississippi, against johnson discuss this broad immunity principle that nacht, so what, what was up with a pardon? what was up with a pardon for president nixon i think if everybody thought that presidents couldn't be prosecuted than what was that about? >> well, he was under investigation for most private and public what conduct at the time, official acts and private conduct. i think everyone has properly understood that the president since like president grants carriage writing incident, everyone is understood that the president could be prosecuted. it's been council well, on breivik, on that score, you there does seem to be some common ground between you and your colleague. on the other side that no man's above the law, and the president can be prosecuted after he leaves office for his private conduct. is that right? we agree with that and then the question becomes, as we've been exploring here today, a little bit about how to segregate private from official conduct that may or may not enjoy some immunity. >> and i'm sure we're going to spend a lot of time exploring that but the dc circuit in blazing game chief judge, their hello, joined b