martin luther king went to see jon kennedy, and kennedy he left the white house and said kennedy didn'tcare. he was really upset about it. what happened over time, because of king and some of the people i have mentioned, people began to see we needed justice. and the pressure came from the bottom up. the marches, the gassing, the dog biting's, the jailing. it did not square with us as free people. we wanted justice. and we demanded justice and the politicians, ultimately after a decade-long struggle, began to pass the laws. women's suffrage, do you think those guys wanted to give you your power? they did not. you think about how long it took for women to get the right to vote. and if you were an african-american, you had to wait even longer to get the right to vote, because you were not favored. and how'd it happen? we demanded it from the bottom up. i am convinced that if we hadn't had the protest on our college campuses, we would still be in vietnam today. they would have some reason as to why we would still be there. it got ended by the students and adults who said enough of this. an

martin luther king went to see jon kennedy, and kennedy he left the white house and said kennedy didn'te. he was really upset about it. what happens over time, because of king and some of the people i mentioned, people began to see we needed justice. and the pressure came from the bottom up. the marches, the gassing, the dog biting's, the jailing, it didn't square with us. as free people. we wanted justice. and we demanded justice. and the politicians ultimately, after decades long struggle, began to pass the laws. women's suffrage, do you think those guys wanted to give you your power? they did not. and you think about how long it took for women to get the right to vote. and if you are an african-american, you would have to wait even longer to get the right to vote. because you weren't favored. and how did it happen? we demanded it from the bottom up. i am convinced that if we hadn't had the protests on our college campuses, we would still be in vietnam today. they would have some reason as to why we would still be there. it got ended by the students and the adults who finally said eno

kennedy: does that include john bolton? >> i am very disappointed jon because at minimum he broke his mba here. at maximum. kennedy: he is the overloads of 2020. >> i think jon and the president have a fundamental different view of the world outlook. kennedy: then why hire him in the first place? maybe the president is bad at hiring people. >> i think they're clearly been some decisions made in this white house since january 2017 that we look back and regret. i absolutely have no question about that. kennedy: who was the worst hire? >> that is like saying who is the blindness guy in a blind convention. there been so many bad ones. kennedy: for maybes not a great president after all. >> he really does defer, and i saw this one on the campaign he lets the chief of staff hire their own individual and then be accountable. he is not someone who is making every hiring decision and there are many people in that building who he doesn't know that still have their own agenda that need to leave. kennedy: we are talking about a campaign manager and john bolton you

as recognize 65 years ago by then senator jon f. kennedy and his book profiles in courage, president johnson was safer removal of office by one vote. and thus by one courageous senator who recognize the legislative overreach that the tenure of office act represented. quoting now from senator edmund g ross, and profiles encourage, who explains his vote as follows. quote the independence of the executive office as a coordinate branch of government was on trial. if the president must step down upon insufficient proof and from partisan considerations, the office of the president would be degraded. ". so to hear, contrary to apparently the fashion now, senator ross's action was eventually praised and accepted several decades after his service. and again many years later by president kennedy as a courageous stand against legislative mob rule. professor dershowitz will have more to say about one other courageous senator from more on that later. but for now, the point as our history demonstrates that presidents should not be subject to impeachment

as recognize 65 years ago by then senator jon f. kennedy and his book profiles in courage, president johnson was safer removal of office by one vote. and thus by one courageous senator who recognize the legislative overreach that the tenure of office act represented. quoting now from senator edmund g ross, and profiles encourage, who explains his vote as follows. quote the independence of the executive office as a coordinate branch of government was on trial. if the president must step down upon insufficient proof and from partisan considerations, the office of the president would be degraded. ". so to hear, contrary to apparently the fashion now, senator ross's action was eventually praised and accepted several decades after his service. and again many years later by president kennedy as a courageous stand against legislative mob rule. professor dershowitz will have more to say about one other courageous senator from more on that later. but for now, the point as our history demonstrates that presidents should not be subject to impeachment

kennedy: would you rather have jon boehner michael avenatti as president? google thing they're putting on i think it strange i don't think it proves anything. i think it proves maybe the opposite effect. if your google insider trading you are trying to find what the law is. kennedy: you don't want to run a foul of the law. >> maybe is not a good reader, i don't know. kennedy: i cannot believe i'm like the farmer who's worried she's got a dried cow. but these are gushing. he is very much providing force. >> very much providing in some ways by don't know that he will be for very long. it sounds like he has three cases. kennedy: there's one from stormy daniels? talk about. [inaudible] >> it's a amazing to think anyone ever thought he was amazed white knight. kennedy: he was nasty. but a member on twitter there is # boston. nothing in the cell creep, so just putting this aside and went to el chapo's sentencing because i knew last time he was going to speak in the open air in front of anyone ever again, and he took three quarters of his time to rail against the

kennedy: i'm just having fun there will is talking. well jond to bring in the president's former national security advisor and chief of stash. [laughter] the panel has return i naz michael and matt, ynez i will start with you. i want to hear about jon bolton because i think jon will once the party. he wants to destroy democrats. >> it's very interesting if he doesn't that come and testify. one is whether he will show up. and what questions will he answer? he is going to turn this into the jon bolton show you know i kind of enjoy the jon bolton show so personally bring it on. but it will be interesting to see what he does and what he doesn't there will be a lot of associated court battles with this. and it's interesting house did not want to take on those they did not want to subpoena him. kennedy: they said yeah they could testify they threw their hands up and i know nancy's being shrewd and all of that but the longer she holds onto the articles of impeachment, the closer we get to iowa and new hampshire. and if she waits another week, or two w

kennedy: , but president obama's former secretary of state jon kerry, why the long face. he was the architect of that nuclear deal. and he said quotes i think it's a tragedy for the world that instead of diplomacy this administration has rushed a confrontation. if this develops into eight hits for tats increased efforts will become a war that is meaningless and did not have to happen and would be a war reckless war of choice. that would be by the president of the night states. that is not you jon kerry. that on capitol hill members of congress attend classified briefings today hungry for background info on the president's plan. democrats left the briefing quite angry. >> my reaction to this briefing is it was sophomoric and utterly unconvincing. i calmly from this briefing really angry, deeply dissatisfied. >> it raised more questions than it answered. >> president trump assassinated soleimani he had no evidence of an eminent attack. kennedy: is the left wise to pounce on the president's iran dealings are they just blowing partisan smoke? let's meet tonight's party panel

kennedy: but president trump says he still thanks the whole thing is a giant undulating hunk of bs. he tweeted today quote here we go again, another con jon by the do-nothing democrats prayed all this work was supposed to be down in the house, not the senate. tomorrow, this whole sentence fiasco of officially gets underway. and only gets better, doesn't it? so what can we expect, joining me now with his live report its fox news white house correspondent kevin corke. >> it would not be an overstatement to suggest the speaker of the house really relished an opportunity to lack of better expression, really stick it to the president. if you had a chance to watch in particular the end grossman's ceremonious solids all smiles, souvenir opinions, all handed out by the speaker today. really quite remarkable that ceremony late this afternoon. you could argue she delighted that quote the president will be impeached forever,". and with that, the names of those who would in her words dispense justice and facilitate the removal of the president, if house democrats get their way, there are the seven managers include using intelligent committee chair ad