now i can say thanks like jon kyl has a-- tail and it's not where you think it would be. (laughter) >> stephen: there's a reason he never wears a tank top. note, that was not intended to be a factual statement. speaking of never intending to give factual statements, fox and friends. this weekend they explained why there is no need for planned parenthood, even if 97% of their services are contraception, breast cancer screening, std testing and other services like pap smears. >> because as a brown haired guy whose's not steve doocy told the blond haired guy who is steve doocy and the blond haired girl who is not gretchen carlson, america already has a trusted place for those services, jim? >> he was talking about planned parenthood being this great provider where women can get blood pressure checks and pap smears and breast -- >> which you can get at walgreen's. >> exactly right. >> stephen: exactly. you can get a pap smear or a breast exam at walgreen's. (laughter) (applause) >> stephen: i'm pretty sur sure-- i'm pretty sure they're between the swiffer refills and the cat

but now i got a call yesterday from jon kyl who's the new governor and so let's reignite the in jealousy for can't be the first it to get rid of the income tax. who knows? we might get arizona. you are a bunch of states that have been tax cuts and you can see -- if you use a time series cross-section, examples i'm giving you are basically anecdotal, nine-nine close. they are really a luster to of what's going on. it's not misleading but it took the cross-section analysis and to the metrics which i told you why growth rates differ. every single state, every single year and you just look at those numbers and you can see. the results -- >> if i could ask you to switch to the federal level, and you were given a choice of three federal taxes to reduce, which would be your top 30? >> i think the progressive income tax is the single worst tax ever, major tax. i think the estate tax is disgusting beyond belief. here you are. you earn your money after tax. you can take that money, go to vegas, gamble, drink and you can smoke. federal government says god bless you, go for it. but if you decide you

come in and vote no because of amnesty from rush limbaugh and i'm in the well of the senate with jon kyl lindsey graham to notorious liberals, but also ted kennedy, diane feinstein and harry reid. the six of us were working on the boat and we lost. i was one of the most mind-boggling things i have ever seen. it is harder now i think that my attitude is why would he want to come here if all you want to do is to raise money and get reelected? why wouldn't you want to make a difference? when i hear some of the criticism about, when i point out to some of the hell-raisers now. look when clinton was president tom and i were in the leadership we got welfare reform which president clinton signed in late head of balanced budget. we did tax reform and measure telecommunications reform the safe drinking water and raise military pay. what among those is not a good thing? what among those is not conservative from some of my conservative friends? i tell some of them look, just to do nothing is not a conservative position. to change the direction of the country you have to get an action whether it's l

republicans were reporting no because of amnesty from rush limbaugh, and i'm in the well the senate with jon kyl and lindsey graham, but also ted kennedy, dianne feinstein, and harry reid. the six of us working the vote, and we lost. that was one of the most mind-boggling things i've ever seen. is harder now, i think, but my attitude is why would you want to come here? why would you come sneer why wouldn't you want to make a difference? when i hear the criticism about things i have done, i point out to some of it, look, when clint was president and tom and i were leadership, we got welfare reform, and we did a balanced budget. we did tax reform. we did measured telecommunications reform, safe drinking water, portability of insurance, raise military pay. what among those is not a good thing. one among those is not conservative from some of my conservative friends. i tell some of them, just to do something is not a conservative position, to change the direction of the country, you got to get something done. it is harder to do it, and you do run the risk of getting queet, i guess, or losing your le

willing, and able, what good is it for science to have increased the lifespan if it means the human jon kyltarts at an earlier age? under these unhappy conditions, you can go from back laurette degree to banishment in a bit over 20 years." justifiable reasons for this phenomenon known as the aging worker problem. rapid technological changes. a fast transition to automation that replaces man with machine, the swift progress of knowledge in general to a sophisticated plateau which makes yesterday's education seem old hat and useless. -- a concerncern for the nurturing of young people and the well-known population explosion. in could postulate we are the midst of two population explosions. the second is the constantly growing mass of men and women between 50 and 60 who have been cast aside and now find themselves in a desperate struggle for survival in a worl d they never made. we should start worrying about them because of their problem isn't solved, you can have a depressing effect on the national economy. it will in one way or the other touch the pocketbooks and fortunes of every american a