jon moss correctlyjudged that kane was filed by liverpool's goalkeeper.e issue is dealt with and the penalty itself. they are saying that the correct decision was made. when it comes to the insurgency, they say that the speed of the attack, he was uncertain of the identity of the liverpool player. correctly sought clarification, and then was able to judge, and ask if he had touched the ball. this is a pensive statement attempting to draw line under the matter, but of course there is that other issue. whenjon moss, by his headset asked if martin atkinson had feed anything on tv? that's not allowed. they are not allowed to view the tv monitors, the fourth officials. martin atkinson did not view a monitor, and jon moss recognises that he was misguided in referencing that. i can tell you that from social media, this debate is set to go on for a very long time. a lot of opinions about that whole incident. let's talk to former prmeier league referee dermot gallagher. let's put aside the decision to award the penalty and focus on the process. it'll seem to most