our gross mar jirngs but you will always see us staying on the edge of relevance. >> exlevenlt jonathan busher athena health. thank you for coming on this show. >> it's an honor. >> thank you. you heard mr. bush, here's the thing. these are high multiple expensive stocks. they have tremendous growth. remember this is another 30% grower. if you like high growth, are you getting it at discount rye i now. should matter to a lot of people. mad money is back after this break. >>> coming up, prime time? from real estate to utilities, the stocks that had been a haven for dividend investors have been getting hit by fed concerns. the recent pullpack pie have you eyeing a buy. but buffer make your move, find out what cramer has been eyeing in tonight's edition of "off the charts." >>> later, cramer is outraged. he has taken note of home activities that can put home gamers at risk. tonight, he's out to protect your portfolio, stick around to find out what's making cramer so mad, all coming up on "mad money." a talking car. but i'll tell you what impresses me. a talking train. this ge locomotive can tel

jonathan karl has that part of the story. when it was president bush collecting records, a certain senator was outraged. >> no more national security spying on citizens who are not suspected of a crime. >> reporter: this time it's his o.w.n. allies who are rout raged at him. >> it violates the heart and soul of america. >> reporter: one senator demanded to know if his phones were monitored. >> could you assure to us that no one phones inside the capital were monitored of members of congress. >> i don't think this is an appropriate setting for me to discuss that issue. >> the correct answer would be no, we stayed within our range and i'm assuring you we did not spy on members of congress. >> reporter: today the white house said it's all legal, approved by a special intelligence court, but that court last year reviewed more than 1,700 requests from the administration. how many did it turn down? zero. the president has some unlikely supporters on this -- republicans. >> so you keep up what you're doing, president bush started it, president obama is contin

bush whacked. look for something that's steady, proven. i like telephone, at & t. >> very good. jonathanfirst you said buy this pick that bets on gold prices going down and it's a winner. what's next? >> the biggest advantage you have in the market is trading with the trend. in my mind, the biggest trend now is where i'm putting my clients is position for higherd. interest rates.siti treasury high school their fastest rise in 50 years in the last couple of weeks.ve mortgage rates have had their fastest weekly rise in 25. ttys goes up -- >> very good. stay hot, my friend. that's it for "cashin' in" thiss week. what a week. boston terrorism, espionage, gay marriage, illegals becoming legals and where is president obama? off spending $100 million of oue tax dollarssi touring africa. just another selfish politician cashing in on our hard work. have a great weekend, everybody. >> hello, everyone. i'm kimberly guilfoyle. it's 5:00 o'clock in new york city and this is "the five". >> it's day five of the george zimmerman murder trial down in sanford, florida. lawyers try to prove who was the one

bush/cheney. but now it's a crisis. how can anyone buy this argument? >> well, i think that jonathan said is right.y inherited the pate troc act, but we also inherited a new america when september 11th happened. and what the president is doing is recognizing that we do need to create a system of checks and balances, and it's not going to be pretty. but what it does do is it opens up this important conversation for every american to be having this conversation with their government and also with their kids and their family of how much data are we sharing, not only with the government, but every time you post something on facebook, that becomes a collective of a big firm. so it's important for us to have these conversations. it's important for us to be clear that we are in a different world. and how are we creating those checks and balances? and i have to say the fact that president obama has always been touted as someone who is pragmatic president, this is the type of person that we need setting those types of rules. that you know they're going to be fair. they're going to be as transparent as possi

jonathan, i was trying to get the datelines here. doug shulman, a george w. bush appointee to head the irs, was head of the irs during all this escapading, apparently. >> that's right. he left toward the end of 2012, november 2012. so in fact, all of those travels and things like that were all under his watch. >> what stuns me is, you know, i can understand in probably a job that requires a lot of tedious work, hard work, repetitive work, and maybe certainly indoor work at a desk. you'd never get up. they figure that every couple months they have to give their employees something to look forward to. i understand that. but why do they take 2,600 employees from out here on the beltway and fly them all the way to california, to anaheim, for a conference? why didn't they go to, like, williamsburg or somebody by bus or something you can do without this enormous expense of travel? any explanation? >> it's crazy, especially since, remember, there was the gsa scandal, the government service administration scandal over lavish spending and craziness. and that -- these thing

bush and cheney. >> it is living in a w world, on that, we have to go. thank you to curt, katrina, jonathann. that's all the for now. ""andrea mitchell reports"" is next. yeah, we found that wonderful thing. next. is next. at's all the for now. ""andrea mitchell reports" is next. hat's all the for now. ""andrea mitchell reports" is next. andrea mitchell reports" i next. because that wonderful, bouncy, roll-around thing... had made you play. and that... had made you smile. [ announcer ] beneful. play. it's good for you. >>> right now on andrea mitchell reports, a victory. sexual assault prosecutions away from the commanders bill was killed. >> a lot of folks don't feel comfortable reporting the crimes because they feel they'll either be retaliated against or marginalized in their career or even blamed. >> i don't personally believe that you can eliminate the command structure in the military from this process because it is the culture, it is the institution, it's the people within that institution that have to

bush administration as well. and the story reminded me, and if it's not a fair comparison, please, point it out, jonathan.brought it up in my mind when we found out that the pentagon hosted anwar al-awlaki at a lunch a couple months after 9/11. of course, we now know he has inspired a multitude of different terrorist attacks, one including on our soil at fort hood. is this the same sort of thing? is this, does this fit into the same category about not really engaging, not really knowing who to engage, or is this about, you know, keep your friends close and your potential enemies closer? >> well, let's just be very clear about this. al-awlaki was an al-qaeda cleric. bin buy ya is not that, but he has associations that raise eyebrows and raise questions. and so, you know, i wouldn't put him on the same level as awlaki, but we need to vet people more carefully, especially if we're going to let people into the white house. if you're going to invite them into the center of american power, these people should be vetted properly, and if his associations include kardawi, i think that's a problem. jenna: the inves

jonathan turley a great legal website that we use often. we thank you for being on here today. you've been an advocate of civil liberties and you en a critic of george w. bush reaction to his defense of the program today? >> i thought was curious. i'm not too sure what questions he was answering. they are not the questions being posed. first of all that the notion that these programs are modest is rather laughable. what the government is creating are massive data banks that will effectively make transparent the communications and twists of citizens that nor the charged with any crime. if you look at the telephone companies they were demanding every single phone call made by every single citizen. it's the type of surveillance that was futuristic that was not technically possible but it is now. the question is being raised, how will this type of fish bowl society change not just our relationship to our government but who we are. do you feel that all of your communications are being fed into a massive database that the government has access to. it's a major violation of privacy. i really astonished by the dismissive attitude of the president. >> megyn: he came