i never requested my money from jonathan kaplan or anyone affiliated with 655 alvarado street. i am aware that in building in san francisco is not an easy process. >> sorry, ma'am. >> i have to ask you to wrap up there. >> thank you, commissioners. >> thank you for your comments. >> it will take me a minute. >> good afternoon. my name is jerry. i handed out a copy of the whistleblower complaint that i had filed with the controller who was also the city services auditor regarding the removal of the house at 655 alvarado street. i requested the city service auditor to opine whether dbi classified the violation at 655 alvarado correctly as work beyond the scope of the existing building permit or if dbi made e error and it was an unpermitted demolition. page 18 clues a copy of the complaint the planning department filed and they used the word structure removal. i'm going to repeat that. structure removal. page 19 of the complaint showed the work was classified as exceeding the scope of permit. code section 103a.3.2 defines it as tearing down of a principal portion of a building. pr

i never requested my money from jonathan kaplan or anyone affiliated with 655 alvarado street.i am aware that in building in san francisco is not an easy process. >> sorry, ma'am. >> i have to ask you to wrap up there. >> thank you, commissioners. >> thank you for your comments.