jonathan turley ahead. fired up on that.d at a women's only prison in new jersey has since been moved to another facility, that's after impregnating two female inmates. lauren green has more in the newsroom. >> the transgender inmate says the sex with the two women prisoners was consensual and is blasting them of harsh injustice for transferring to a youth correctional facility where she is the only woman. 27-year-old demi minor posed for the camera. minor is a transgender woman serving 30 years for the stabbing death of her foster father 11 years ago, and she says sexually abused her. in april, it was revealed that minor had impregnated two female prisoners at a new jersey state women's prison. so last month the officials transferred minor to another facility. she tweeted in part, i was moved from a female facility to a male facility, i truly am, it has to stop. on her blog, minor posted that the new jersey department of corrections has "violated my right to be safe and free from sexual harassment by putting me in one of th

jonathan turley george washington law professor, constitutional law attorney and fox news contributorof these actions, you know promoting where abortion is legal amp support private attorneys to challenge state law? do you think these executive actions, if they are challenged, will stand? is there much more the administration can do? >> first of all, much of what the president said was rather odd. he was making statements about the opinion that were demonstrably false. the president seems to no longer feel any sense of restraint to be accurate or even fair to the justices who he'd announced as extremist. but that justices then talked about the history of abortion including the early law governing abortions in england and the united states. that is entirely untrue. the majority -- but also the president is focusing on rights already protected. he talked about protecting the right of women to travel interstate across borders. that is already protected. that is like saying i will protect men from indentured servitude. like been there and done that. this has already a protected right. in

jonathan turley, constitutional law attorney and fox news contributor.. to eat. happened on the 6th of july, out there for mortons to kick him out and this is a justice who not too long ago was the target of an assassination plot. >> it's truly breathtaking and what's more alarming is the difficulty the democratic leaders have in condemning this type of action. secretary buttigieg this weekend basically just saying well, you know, people are upset, and reminded me of when nancy pelosi was asked about people destroying statues in her own city and saying well, people will do what people will do. and it's not that you are saying these people don't have a right to protest, of course they do. you can have a right to something and abuse that right. recognize the right and yet condemn how people are using it. someone is going to get hurt. you can't create the supreme court safari atmosphere to bag a justice and collect a reward without someone crossing the line. who do you think responds to these types of calls? so, when people come in close contact, when they

. >> carley: you have jonathan turley say that he thinks it is strange he witnesses like president bidening been there haven't been called to testify. others say hunter could get a pretty cushy plea deal. how do you think this ends? >> i know the department of justice is going to go to great lengths to protect hunter. >> i always say when he gets indicted, and he will be indicted, that will in essence shield him from ever having to come before any committee in congress and testify. but i tell people don't worry because the republicans are not going to stop. regardless of what the department of justice does, if they slap hunter biden on the wrist, it doesn't matter. the whole reason we are investigating hunter biden is to compromise joe biden. the problem the department of justice has is, we believe joe biden knew very well everything hunter biden did, all of the adversaries that he was influence peddling with, all the government sweetheart deals that he was promising people in return for huge sums of money. we believe joe biden knows and this administration is potentially compromise. we

jonathan turley explains. six lucky numbers could mean a check with nine zeros.else. because i'm not everyone else. they drink what they're told to drink. i drink what helps me rehydrate and recover: pedialyte® sport. because it works... and so do i. ♪♪ hydration beyond the hype. ♪♪ people with plaque psoriasis, are rethinking the choices they make. like the shot they take. the memories they create. or the spin they initiate. otezla. it's a choice you can make. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, you can achieve clearer skin. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla can cause serious allergic reactions. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about yo

jonathan turley says hunter's time could be running out and fast.telligence agencies about your d.n.a. there are people looking to weaponize people's genes that they get from donations to companies that do people's family tree. so, what if you've already had your d.n.a. analyzed? life... doesn't stop for diabetes. be ready for every moment, with glucerna. it's the number one doctor recommended brand that is scientifically designed to help manage your blood sugar. live every moment. glucerna. with best western rewards you get rewarded when you stay on the road and on the go. find your rewards so you can reconnect, disconnect, hold on tight and let go! stay two nights and get a free night. book now at bestwestern.com. i'd like to take a moment to address stay two nights my fellow veterans because i know so many of you have served our country honorably. one of the benefits that we as a country give you as a veteran is the eligibility for a va loan, for up to 100% of your home's value. if you need cash for you family, call newday usa. with automatic aut

jonathan turley is right.xecutive orders that would make a difference and really reveal the priorities of this president. he could reverse his keystone pipeline. he could send the state department to help negotiate a settlement with ukraine and russia to get our food supply stable. he's not doing that. they believe they can do this through politics. they think abortion politics is good politics. trace, i think it's not so cut and dry. it will energize the left. that's true. it could bring in moderate suburban white women that were on the fence. could happen. beware the rise of the latino mom. you're seeing these elections in important starts. if you want to make abortion the issue, you'll remind hispanics who are right now really mad at you because of inflation and the economy more than any other demographic. you'll give them yet another reason to vote against you. this is the most important swing vote. ironically, it's hispanic women, not men, that are leading the charge right now. >> trace: the left winds yo

. >> kayleigh: that is the key question and jonathan turley said there is to be a special counsel. they not interview the big guy tony bob belinsky, how could he not be called into the grand jury? >> we know every single one of these business deals thanks to the big guy's dad. he said it himself, it's all about his name. how much did he know? but we were talking earlier, why should we care? he is just the son of the president's family and should be off limits. no, obviously might be and have put in jeopardy because of a result of this. what did the staff know and how much work that they have to do on his behalf to clean this up or keep things at bay? and they were working on behalf of the big guy, how much to the little guy, suffer? and that is why we should care about this other than breaking the law and that little detail. >> kayleigh: you mentioned how this ties into policy. i mean, reports guidances 900 barrels of strategic oil to china company, one that hunter biden used to be a part of the pier they had $1.7 billion stake in this company. these are questions that you can go r

i want to read this, george washington university law professor jonathan turley told "the new york post," "the last few weeks the compelling basis for a charge has been unassailable and undeniable. "what do you think? >> the bottom line we know hunter biden and found on his laptop the computer shop in delaware and two years now with the doj but refused to investigate that he had business dealings when it came to burisma. $80,000 out of ukrainian burisma. we know his father utilized the quick providence journal and went in there and threatened not to give to if they went forward with investigations. we know sanctions from china with the state owned bank. we know he presented former president columbia to his father. we know that this biden crime family unfettered in their violations the 1930s state act but never -- this was the trump family and a republican you would see for bigger consequences in congress. and i hope to doing jim jordan to investigate twos up to mixed up two-tiered elitist and once and for all stop the biden crime family. >> todd: cory, to that point, will hunter biden a

jonathan turley, thanks so much. >> no.ert now. you can see at the bottom of our screen prime minister boris johnson set to announce his resignation. it will happen any moment. we will bring it to you live. plus, this. a survey reveals 65% of small business owners could be forced permanently closed if prices continue to rise. look at that number. a small business panel shares their message for lawmakers. ♪ san antonio steve fox news alert. 10 downing street boris johnson about to call it quits. >> i the process of choosing that new leader should begin now. and the timetable will be announced next week and i have today appointed a cabinet to serve as i will until a new leader is in place. so i want to say to the millions of people who voted for us in 2019 many of them voting conservative for the first time thank you for that incredible mandate. the biggest conservative majority since 1987. the biggest share of a vote since 1979. and the reason i have fought so hard in the last few days to continue to deliver that mandate in

jonathan turley getting up early. , sir.s having breakfast with friends as we kick off independence day weekend. he's not far from west point. >> we are at andy's restaurant in highland falls, new york. i'm going to introduce you to two individuals. one is living at the american dream, the immigrant dream. another follows his grandparents into the united states. when we come back on "fox & friends." ♪ ♪ y to treat hiv. it's every-other-month, injectable cabenuva. for adults who are undetectable, cabenuva is the only complete hiv treatment you can get every other month. cabenuva helps keep me undetectable. it's two injections, given by a healthcare provider every other month. it's one less thing to think about while traveling. hiv pills aren't on my mind. a quick change in my plans is no big deal. don't receive cabenuva if you're allergic to its ingredients or taking certain medicines, which may interact with cabenuva. serious side effects include allergic reactions, post-injection reactions, liver problems, and depression. i

jonathan turley and the president of the national border patrol council, let's save the legal analysisnt and, brandon, i think you can probably channel these frustrations as to why they are going to even try to do this but what are you hearing from them? >> absolutely. when you look at what is currently happening and what they are left to deal with. when the federal government fails to do the job in these counties, they have to clean up every aspect of the illegal immigration problem that we are currently facing. what's interesting about this as two of these counties are predominantly democrats. both sheriff's are democrats. kinney county -- this can be considered a bipartisan effort. and that clearly shows that this issue is a very important issue across the country. but in these counties, these counties have to pick up all of the shattered pieces the federal government is leaving behind because we refused to do the job that is necessary to protect the border and protect the community. >> bill: part of the argument they are making from a legal standpoint, is the federal government has

joining me now is jonathan turley, law professor at george washington university, fox news contributor. the question came up yesterday and a friend of mine who clerks with me said that's not going to last long. is it that clear cut and could the concern about the court be the reason for the hesitation by the biden administration? >> it is troubling to hear some of the rhetoric in the last 48 hours. you have a u.s. senator say the chains are off president biden now. why? because congress didn't yield to his demands. you have others just today who moved the court packing bill forward to. the message seems to be that we support the system so long as it yields to our demands. you look at the climate change issue, the administration tried to go at this in a unilateral way with the epa case which was handed down by the supreme court. they lost by a considerable measure. the supreme court found the biden administration exceeded its constitutional authority. they went to congress and saw climate change and other measures there, that was blocked by not just joe manchin but about half of the sen

joining me now is jonathan turley george washington university law professor. i think a future administration is trying to take this beyond donald trump and pat cipollone to what is happening in the future to this idea of a candidate back and forth between a president and his white house counsel, how damaging could this be? >> this is the very core of executive privilege. you just cannot get more concentrated privilege argument than the white house counsel himself. it is absolutely essential for a president to be able to turn to an attorney in the white house and asked for his frank advice. that conversation is going to be somewhat chilled if the president believes that some questions or comments that he may have could end up being replayed. this is already part of a growing trend. now presidents have to deal with tell-all books and all of these leaks. here you have the white house counsel who is going to be speaking to congress. i would feel better about this, i like the transparency that we have around january 6, we need to know what happened. i would feel be

andy mccarthy, and jonathan turley are with us. jonathan, kick things off to each of you first as we await the beginning of this. >> well, this is a key hearing because this is the lynch pin. they have been arguing that the president conspired for an insurrection or riot to occur. this is the other part of that conspiracy, to see if they can show that close nexus, more than a tweet there was actual coordination or collusion. >> and andy, jason was not with the oath keepers at the capitol on january 6th, he was there in 2015 and 2016. he's expected to give some background to the group. >> i think they are going to try to highlight the seditious conspiracy indictment against some of the militias, but it's important to recognize the justice department has been investigating this for a year and a half and they have not charged anyone, either president trump or anyone in his circle, people who are helping with this. >> sandra: we are going to listen in now. we want to warn you, some of the pictures and video shown throughout the hearing

jonathan turley says the focus is her husband, supreme court justice clarence thomas. he makes his case coming up. >> sandra: a major clamp down in the u.s. housing market. the white house is keeping busy trying to redefine the word recession. but are we already in one or on the verge of one? we will ask charlie and jackie live on set next. >> the biden plan to end recession to avoid recession, is to change the definition of recession. . ngersticks. now i'm managing my diabetes better and i've lowered my a1c from 8.2 to 6.7. take the mystery out of managing your diabetes and lower your a1c. now you know. try it for free at freestylelibre.us recession. >> sandra: new sfirgs -- figures showing warning signs for the housing market. prices are up more than 20% over the past year, amazing time for the housing market in this country, driving sales down by 8% just last month now. those numbers fueling concerns we may in some sort of recession. charlie and jackie, everybody is watching the housing market, it hung in there i think even longer than a lot of these other data poin

with that, we bring in constitutional attorney and fox news contributor, jonathan turley, andy mccarthy with me, former federal prosecutor and fox news contributor. what was accomplished here and what is the goal in the end? >> i think the goal is to show that goal is unfit for office. i can't help but think that this is what we should have seen 17 months ago during the impeachment proceedings. it doesn't advance a criminal case. if they're trying to show he's unfit, you know, thompson talked about dereliction of duty at the end there. that was the impeachment case that they should have brought but didn't bring. >> martha: yeah. jonathan, it does feel like that. feels like we have a lot of testimony, very compelling much of it. and then in the end, we're told here's what you should think about what you just saw. >> yeah, i think the most telling moment at the end was congressman raskin saying where do we go from here. i was waiting for that answer. because it was raskin and others saying this is all about a criminal case. we believe we have evidence of a crime. we have one hearing to go

jonathan turley says time is running out for hunter biden, so what happens next?will be surprised who says yes. i'm john roberts. sandra and i will see you at the top of the hour for "america reports." ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> emily: she just turned 53 and she has still got it going on. jennifer lopez is sharing some revealing new images to push her new skin care line. the new mrs. ben affleck says it's all about empowering women to take as much care of their bodies as they deal with their faces, and it is clearly working for her, lara. do you see this as empowering? >> lara: well, as an individual who enjoys working out, i would say she has been putting some time in at the gym. but if you got it, flaunt it. i have no problem with this. i think it's great and i hope at 53 -- i'm sure they will find me to do the same ad. my last name is trump so we know that's not a possibility paid [laughter] i'm great with this. >> emily: candidly, to the same point, why don't women get the same credit the athletes get? rather than sparking conversation if it's empowering or not, she takes car

we heard from jonathan turley on this a short while ago. what are your thoughts.ten to this and we'll get your thoughts on the other side. >> we have to remember the f.b.i. had hunter's computer back in december of 2019 and didn't do anything with it. when we were offered that we went to the f.b.i. do you know something about this? stolen goods? they told us nothing. we have a two-tier system of justice, one for powerful democrats, their family and friends and one for the rest of americans playing out with the january 6ers. we don't really prosecute the summer rioters, an unequal application of justice and unsustainable state of affairs when the american public can't trust the f.b.i. and federal law enforcement and department of justice. that's the sad state of affairs right now. >> martha: do you think the department of justice will investigate and potentially bring any criminal charges against president trump? >> i don't have any doubt they are investigating him. it is interesting the january 6th committee i read this report. bennie thompson who is chairing that

here now as jonathan turley george washington university law professor, fox news contributor, professor n, n, it was all a little too cute by half the interview followed by the story. well, it was a complete package, wasn't it? but the the gist of what the attorney general said is unassailably true. obviously, if there was evidence criminal conduct by any president, including former president trump, most of us , i hope would be saying he should be charged. i felt that richard nixont should have been charged. i felt bill clinton should havec been charged in those were easyo cases. those were very clear ,uld w straight forward crimes that i think could have been a resulted in rather quick convictions. that's not a current situation with donald trump. the six committee said that they would be presenting new evidencewo showing crimes committed by president trump. they really haven't made that case yet. they haven't put out a greatrm atdeal of new information. now, this new this grand jury may have new information, but b they need to be able to makecl their case with some clarity. and , youa

george washington professor jonathan turley weighs.ries. head to foxandfriends.com for free v.i.p. tickets and then we feed you everything we have. ♪ there's a different way to treat hiv. it's every-other-month, injectable cabenuva. for adults who are undetectable, cabenuva is the only complete hiv treatment you can get every other month. cabenuva helps keep me undetectable. it's two injections, given by a healthcare provider every other month. it's one less thing to think about while traveling. hiv pills aren't on my mind. a quick change in my plans is no big deal. don't receive cabenuva if you're allergic to its ingredients or taking certain medicines, which may interact with cabenuva. serious side effects include allergic reactions, post-injection reactions, liver problems, and depression. if you have a rash and other allergic reaction symptoms, stop cabenuva and get medical help right away. tell your doctor if you have liver problems or mental health concerns, and if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or considering pregnancy. some o

jonathan turley made a good point, it's this.ship with hunter biden, they talked about it. they have the voice mail. how can you reach a very generous plea agreement without talking to a main witness there. also, i would just remind you, paul manafort, he was convicted, he got the maximum 60 month sentence. if hunter biden gets a plea deal, paul manafort gets the maximum sentence in prison, what a disparity that would be. pete: it almost feels like a disparity like that in inevitable. that's the frustrating part. what you see is trump supporters, administration officials dragged out of their house in the dead of night for january 6th, folks involved there being treated one way when it almost feels like a foregone conclusion that hunter's going to skate at some level. >> it does. and turley pointed out, look, we need a special council here, remember jeff sessions brought in a special council, mueller got a lot of criticism. i don't believe it's the right call but it's the appearance of a conflict of interest that led jeff sessions

jonathan turley was with us yesterday cities can invoke the constitution on this, i mean legally canutely. look what the actual law says is in the constitution that if the federal government is not upholding its end of the bargain meant to secure the border it falls back to the states. the only judicial ruling on the sow's. texas has an obligation as a sovereign entity itself to defend its people if you have a constitution recognizes that specifically. the history bears that out. what i'm asking for is for all of the leaders of the state, local, county state leaders to recognize that and for us to declare an invasion and act accordingly. make a court strike that down. let's have the fight. let's elevate the fact that texas is taking it on the chin and go use our constitutional authority in a republic, go do with the federal government it's purposely refusing to do and that's what they're doing. the federal government is failing. spew and i've got another topic for you. at least a dozen house republicans are pushing for answers as to why some trump era administration judges have been

jonathan turley says you don't have a legal leg to stand on.sis at the border is a political and not constitutional problem. he says you don't have much to go on here. how would you counter that? >> well, on a couple of levels, first of all, it has not been meted out in the courts so the question does not have a lot of case law. i think the united states gave great deference because of the clarity in the provision for the states to preserve the self-defense power. and you've had a supreme court where conservative judges like antonin scalia, alito and thomas said in the case of arizona, that they should be able to enforce the laws of the land, even the federal laws, and if they can't do that in that manner, then we should stop calling them sovereign states. those are the words of jus -- justice scalia. most americans can read the constitutional language. it's not federal or state statute, this is our constitution and scenario where it has to be activated or we are going to get two plus more years of the staggering numbers and it's unacceptable a

jonathan turley what's happening in texas. >> i'm afraid i'm skeptical as they say in texas, the dogterpreted and long interpreted to mean an actual foreign invasion. i don't think a court would seriously consider expanding the term invasion to cover this. >> so, art, if a court were to say to the counties, sorry, you can't do this, what would that mean for enforcement at the border? >> i mean, it's just another one of those monkey wrenches thrown out there. but when you start looking at what is happening, you've got individuals that are coming into the united states, it's been said and proven many of those do not fall under the asylum rules but they are going to claim asylum, released in the united states, many court cases are not heard from 5 to 6 years, and they stay here, they don't intend going to the court, it has to be called an invasion. i've said it for a couple years now and a lot of people shied away from the word but at the end of the day when you enter a country and don't have a legal right to be there and refuse to leave, it's nothing more than just an invasion and peop

. >> sandra: jonathan turley, george washington law professor, and fox news contributor.guilty on both counts. the jury just reaching this verdict a short time ago. count 1, willful failure to appear for testimony, guilty. count 2, willful failure to provide records, guilty. your reaction. >> one of the most predictable convictions i've seen in my career as a legal analyst. i mean, the reason you could predict this outcome is very simple, that he didn't put on a defense. he didn't show up to congress. he didn't present any witnesses, and now he's going to go on appeal presumably he'll have more to say there. but he did not have a viable defense. he was not a government official to even make a substantial claim of privilege. but also at the time many of us said you are making a huge mistake. you should show up in congress. you can always take your 5th amendment protection, the privilege against self-incrimination, plenty of witnesses do that, but you should show up. he decided basically that he would thumb his nose at congress and go his own way. well, you can't. this is a

here's an op-ed on foxnews.com by jonathan turley "supreme court's term closes with political media leadersuestioning legitimacy." since the supreme court overturned roe v. wade, we have seen extreme views of the institution service and witness a startling crisis of faith. the article starts by saying for justices, the end of the supreme court usually brings welcome vacations out of town. this week it seemed more like they were fleeing the jurisdiction with a mob at their heels. six justices and their homes are targeted because they dared to interpret the constitution in a way that is opposed by many in the political, media and academic establishments. after the overturning of roe v. wade, many call for impeachment and disciplining justices. what is chilling is that these calls have not come from extremist groups but political and media figures who are challenging the "legitimacy of the supreme court." president biden was at the nato summit. there is a press conference. he was asked about how global leaders view u.s. leadership in the world following the supreme court decision. [video clip]

here's an op-ed on foxnews.com by jonathan turley "supreme court's term closes with political media leadersuestioning legitimacy." since the supreme court overturned roe v. wade, we have seen extreme views of the institution service and witness a startling crisis of faith. the article starts by saying for justices, the end of the supreme court usually brings welcome vacations out of town. this week it seemed more like they were fleeing the jurisdiction with a mob at their heels. six justices and their homes are targeted because they dared to interpret the constitution in a way that is opposed by many in the political, media and academic establishments. after the overturning of roe v. wade, many call for impeachment and disciplining justices. what is chilling is that these calls have not come from extremist groups but political and media figures who are challenging the "legitimacy of the supreme court." president biden was at the nato summit. there is a press conference. he was asked about how global leaders view u.s. leadership in the world following the supreme court decision. [video clip]

we'll talk to chuck grassley, jonathan turley about this swirling out there today coming up.

law professor jonathan turley says this. become una salable and undeniable. miranda devine has been following this story for a long time, actually, this is her story and she joins me now. miranda, how do you see this thing ending? >> look, that's the $64,000 question there, stuart, because its been a very long time that the u.s. attorney in delaware has been investigating hunter biden since 2018, and we know that the grand jury was convened last year, was quite busy during the summer interviewing some of hunter biden's business partners and former lovers, but then, it sort of went dead. there was some indication that they had to, they closed up and reconvened, heard from a couple more witnesses, but we're now heading to that sort of magic period whether it's 60 days or 90 days before the mid-term election where u.s. attorney in delaware david weiss has shown that he sort of abides by the protocol that you don't continue with an investigation in the shadow of an election, in case it becomes politically important, and so we ma

. >> jonathan turley pointing out this the recent exposure of additional foreign contacts strengthenedhe last few weeks compelling basis for agent's registry acts charge unassailable and denial. you would think. fox news contributedder miranda devine author of laptop from hell. i think everyone agrees something is coming. what makes you think that fara violation is in some of these charges. >> two reasons. one is at least two dozen potential fara violations that are evident from the laptop from the influence peddling that both hunter biden and his uncle jim biden were doing whether they were using joe biden's name when he was vice president to extracts millions of dollars from various, you know, oligarchs and chinese state-owned enterprises. and then there's the fact that we know from late from certainly previously from this grand jury in delaware that's been operating since 2018 that they were looking at fara violations. the only flip side of that is that fara violations really have been not very well used at all, even though the law has been in place since 1938, to prevent americans