it unit has been the platform, starting with jordan?— with jordan? with jordan? it has all been true grit and games _ with jordan? it has all been true grit and games they _ with jordan? it has all been true grit and games they have - with jordan? it has all been true j grit and games they have played with jordan? it has all been true i grit and games they have played so far, they have put their bodies on the line. we have gone back to how determined they are to keep the opposition out. it has been a phenomenal display and it has worked really well. i phenomenal display and it has worked reall well. , , , really well. i sense the scottish t in: , really well. i sense the scottish trying. the _ really well. i sense the scottish trying, the second _ really well. i sense the scottish trying, the second group - really well. i sense the scottish trying, the second group match really well. i sense the scottish - trying, the second group match was when — when for you, that was when england looked a little bit wobbly, unsure of themselves and that was the dr

pelosi accepted three and jordan. dave, illinois, why does pelosi play politics with everything and not strive for true facts. we need troops, not power. mccarthy should pull all the members. william, ohio, go ahead. caller: it is just a kangaroo court. just like everything else. a waste of taxpayer money. it was all right, all the hearings the republicans had on an illegitimate deal. jim jordan thinks he is the arresting officer, the judge, the jury, and the executioner. as far as i am concerned, everything to do with the government is a waste of taxpayers' money to have some idiots representing like we have from ohio. that falls back to our great speaker of the house. it is a shame that we have let our political system get to this. i will never vote again in my life. i am 86 and would not waste my >> take you live now to the white house where president biden will be signing a bill into law to replenish the crime victims fund. you're watching live coverage on c-span. ♪ ♪ >> ladies and gentlemen, the president of the

jordan at this time. well, there are some voices who are suspicious of a saudi hand who think that may be i, the king of jordan has not done enough to support the, the gcc states, chiefly saudi arabia, on a number of issues for one. we can also point to the fact that the leadership in jordan is not welcome. it's the growing trend toward normalization, of course, that concerns the u. a. e on it not, not so much saudi arabia, but at the same time, we know that shouting review was in certain ways to certain extents, supportive of the u. a. e and bahrain. moving ahead with the abraham records in from jordan's perspective. those diplomatic deals undermined jordan's position in the region. jordan would like to see the palestinian issue resolved. and when you have gulf states, i normalizing relations with israel before there is resolution of the palestinian question. the perspective from on is that this is the stabilizing, and most importantly it will have the stabilizing impacts on jordan. so that's definitely

jim jordan! why did jim jordan get it? his contributions to wrestling? no, after jordan helped with promoting the election was stored stolen lied, after jordan plotted with trump in the white house about what was happened on january 6th, after he was tried to stop the election results from being finalized, after the riot had been quelled, after he gave this argument about how trump must of one, he must of, you could just smell it. can't you feel it in your gut? after all of that, trump gave him the medal of freedom. he didn't give it to mike pence. and then two days later, jim jordan led the republicans in opposition as the house voted to impeach trump on over what happened on january 6th. so that was a nice try by the republicans, no he's not gonna be on the committee. and mafia dons don't get to help get to the bottom of organized crime, and pyromaniac 's do not get jobs as firefighters either. nancy pelosi did not actually draw the line against republicans who voted against certifying the results election results. there was three of the five appointee

jim jordan. why did jim jordan get it? his contributions to wrestling? nope. after jordan helped with promoting the election was stolen from trump -- lie -- after jordan plotted with trump in the white house about what was going to happen on january 6th, after he did try on january 6th to stop the election results from being finalized, even after the riot had been quelled, after he gave this big stem-winder argument aboutnd how trump must have won, he must have. you can just smell it. don't you feel it in your gut? after all of that, trump did not give the medal of freedom to vice president mike pence who had after all certified the election, he gave it to jim jordan. two days later jim jordan led the republicans in opposition as the house voted to impeach trump for having incited what happened on january 6th. so yeah, that was a nice try by the republicans, but, no, he's not going to be on the committee.elgimp and mafia dons don't get to help to get back to the bottom of organized crime and pyro maniacs don't get jobs as firefighters either. nancy pelosi did

jordan again that the state is very strong. jordan has been struggling economically for several years. a grown grace of unemployment and discontent has led to sporadic protest, during which prince hunter's name was sometimes taunted by demonstrators who saw him as a symbol of reform. and although the prince has not been put on trial, some believe monday sentencing is a clear message to government critics. it's obvious that they were trying to convince even so it's a child by fcc even. so i think this is to be in game. they want to be out of the picture. there was so many, many unions, for instance, what times it to be the region. but now i think i can even next to 0. this has arguably been the most controversial case in jordan for decades. and although a verdict has been issued, the defendants can still appeal. and the other court that's of public opinion is still to give its verdict, dramatic se ya, jesse era. back now to havana, where the cuban president miguel the i can end is speaking, holding a press conference for listeni

jordan not being allowed on, but at the same time given that mr. jordan is a ranking member and mr. banks also is a leader of a large caucus, mr. davis is also -- or representative davis is also a ranking member and speaker pelosi didn't object to him and then representative nehls also voted to object along with representative banks and representative jordan. why do you think there was a difference between her objecting to representative banks and jordan as opposed to representative -- >> i don't know because she named a chairman who objected to presidential and she has raskin who asked for impeachment too so i don't know if the objection matters because her members have objected before. >> yes, sir. >> the bus with the gear on it, that's a finding from the senate report. >> yeah. >> what do you want to find out, who locked the bus? >> why was it there? why didn't they have the gear on? >> isn't the answer that they were just incompetent? what more do you know? >> well, then what's the solution? we want to find solutions. this is why when you look at sheriff troy nehls, 30 years of

is still jordan.reflects, i believe, on the legacy of members of my family, but more importantly, i think the steadfastness of the jordanian people. we do live in a difficult neighborhood. you've got to sort of wake up every morning to look at the glass half full. these are challenges that i hope, you know, the waking up of looking at regional politics or trying to bring people together is what my father inherited from him and what i inherited from my father and what my son has inherited from me. so as difficult as the challenges are, i believe that we can come together. my great-grandfather, as you said, was killed on the steps of the mosque in jerusalem. what we've all been about, always, is looking at jerusalem as a city that brings muslim christians and jews together. it's just inconceivable to me why we would want anything else. my role, my son's role will continue to be how do we make this a city of hope, a city of peace and bringing people together. hopefully that reflects to other policies as

jordan has been struggling economically for several years. unemployment and discontent has led to sporadic protests. the prince's name was sometimes chanted. although the prince has not been put on trial, some believe monday sentencing is a clear message >> it is obvious they were trying to to a trial by absentee for the prince. i think this is the endgame. they want him out of the picture. many jordanians want him to be the leader, but i think his chances are next to zero. reporter: this has arguably been the most controversial case in jordan for decades, and although a verdict has been issued, the defendants can appeal. the other court of public opinion is still to give its verdict. anchor: the white house has issued a strong warning to china over its activities in the south china sea. this comes as hundreds of activists gathered to mark the fifth anniversary of a court ruling against china's territorial claims. reporter: marching in defiance and making a statement in front of the chinese embassy. these activists want to remind beijing of w

pelosi accepted three and jordan.ave, illinois, why does pelosi play politics with everything and not strive for true facts. we need troops, not power. mccarthy should pull all the members. william, ohio, go ahead. caller: it is just a kangaroo court. just like everything else. a waste of taxpayer money. it was all right, all the hearings the republicans had on an illegitimate deal. jim jordan thinks he is the arresting officer, the judge, the jury, and the executioner. as far as i am concerned, everything to do with the government is a waste of taxpayers' money to have some idiots representing like we have from ohio. that falls back to our great speaker of the house. it is a shame that we have let our political system get to this. i will never vote again in my life. i am 86 and would not waste my time to vote for one of them crooks. host: more ahead. coming up, we will talk to two lawmakers about the january 6 committee decisions and other congressional news happening this week. first up, warren davidson of ohio. lat

jordan again that the state is very strong. jordan has been struggling economically for several years, a grown great of unemployment. and this consent has led to sporadic protest, during which prince holmes, his name was sometimes taunted by demonstrators who saw him as a symbol of reform. and although the prince has not been put on trial, some believe monday sentencing is a clear message to governments. critics. it's obvious that they were trying to convince, even so it's a trial by fcc even. so i think this is to be in game one just to me out of the picture. there's so many, many demons forces. what time is it to be the region? but now i think it's even next to 0. this has arguably been the most controversial case. enjoy them for decades, and although a verdict has been issued, the defendants can still appeal. and the other court that's of public opinion is still to give its verdict dramatic shea yal jazeera. with the highly contagious delta variance is likely causing a rapid rise in corona virus. infections across se, asia,

jim banks, jim jordan, jordan in particular one of the staunches.e has rejected this investigation all together. he believes this is all an effort to go after donald trump. he said speaker pelosi herself should be investigated about why the capitol was not secured that day. jim banks put out a statement almost immediately after he was named by kevin mccarthy as the top republican, criticizing pelosi's decision, saying this investigation was an effort to push forward a socialist agenda and didn't seem to be taking this investigation seriously. we're waiting to see what the republican leader ultimately decides here and whether he will pull the picks. we're getting indication that he will pull the picks. assuming he does do that, pelosi told me moments ago she is still prepared to move ahead. she said we have a bipartisan quorum to move ahead. that means the eight members that she selected, they include one republican, liz cheney, who was pushed out of her leadership position after she challenged donald trump in the aftermath of january 6th. we are jus

and jim jordan who is a staunch trump defender.d the other two republicans in voting to overturn the election, but he has clearly not been as outspoken as jordan and banks have been in the days since the january 6th and particularly in the last several days. jim banks in the immediate aftermath of his selection as the ranking member of the committee put out a statement suggesting this investigation was a way to push the democratic agenda through and said they need to look at everything here, including jim jordan suggesting they need to investigate nancy pelosi herself and what she did or did not do to secure the capitol complex. that suggestion has been rejected by democrats who say that was simply an effort to muddy the waters to push an investigation towards pelosi. the question now will be what will kevin mccarthy do with these two additional spots. will he seek to fill them or leave them vacant? that espn a's a question for th republican leader. ultimately she will get the decision again to green light who mccarthy gets to pick

jim jordan. mr. jordan: the leader and jim are exactly right. this has always been about politics and today's actions of the speaker confirm that. frankly, and i've said this before, what else are they going to talk about? they're so focused on the january 6 committee are they going to talk about crime? the fact that crime is up in every major urban area in this country? are they going to talk about the border crisis? march was the highest month on record for illegal crossings until april, april was the highest month until may, may was the highest month on record until june. can't talk about that are they going to talk about inflation? are they going to talk about the price of eggs is up, the price of milk is up, the price of an airline ticket is up, the price of everything is up. they can't talk about that. so they're going to be partisan and focus on this. but as the leader said, and as mr. banks said, i don't think they're going to address the fundamental question. the fundamental question of why wasn't there a proper security presence at the

he's very much a more mature jordan now and i think. more mature jordan now and i think that's— morenk that's what's coming out from - more mature jordan now and i thinkj that's what's coming out from these performances — that's what's coming out from these performances i_ that's what's coming out from these performances. i think— that's what's coming out from these performances. i think it's _ that's what's coming out from these performances. i think it's down - that's what's coming out from these performances. i think it's down to i performances. i think it's down to them _ performances. i think it's down to them and — performances. i think it's down to them and really _ performances. i think it's down to them and really incredible - performances. i think it's down to them and really incredible as - performances. i think it's down to them and really incredible as to i them and really incredible as to what _ them and really incredible as to what he's — them and really incredible as to what he's achieved. _ them and really incredible as to what he's achieved. methods i them and reall

she did not accept jim jordan and jim banks.ited that one statement from jim jordan and specifically pointed to his reference to the biden administration, which did not exist on january 6th as part of the reason she found it ridiculous. she used that word twice, by the way, ridiculous, she said, to put someone like jim banks and jim jordan on the committee. >> antics, she called it. >> reporter: antics, right. democrats will not let their antics get in the way. she had nothing comparable to say about jim jordan sheechlt really did not want to get into detail about these two republicans. and let's just remember for a moment who they are. jim jordan, once upon a time, not that long ago, used to be seen as someone on the far right fringes of the house gop. but now within the caucus at least, he's in the mainstream as the rest of the caucus has moved in his direction. he's currently the ranking member on the judiciary committee. jim banks has come to prominence more recently as a strong, fierce ally of former president trump. he is

jim jordan has served on select committee and serves on one now. made it undeniable, this panel has lost all legitimacy and credibility and it shows exactly what i warned back at the beginning of january, that pelosi would play politics with this. for more than six months, you have a better example of the senate bipartisan. schumer didn't pick who went on of the republicans, they already have the report done by two different committees. two main questions. why was the capitol so ill prepared for that day, when they knew on december 14th they had a problem? and what have we done to make sure that never happens again? pelosi has created a sham process. unless speaker pelosi reverses course and seats all five republicans, we will not participate. but we think it's too important that those two questions, why were we ill prepared, why did they know on december 14th. why would they jeopardize the lives of the capitol police. we will run our own investigation. we have law enforcement, we have military, we have doctors, we have people from all walks of lif

jim jordan has served on select committee and serves on one now. panel has lost all legitimacy and credibility and it shows exactly what i warned back at the beginning of january, that pelosi would play politics with this. for

jim jordan. liz cheney in that fight. i think most independent voters, most voters that decide swing districts and swing states are going to come down on liz cheney's side, not on jim jordan's side. and always if she turns them down, who knows, she could get three looney toons next that everybody has heard of that are really incentivized to be crazy because that's the only way they make money in their campaigns, you know. the qanon lady and crazy boebert or whatever her name is. so i think in some ways they can work with these people, especially considering we've got three to three in terms of republicans who bought the big lie and protected the big lie and those who rejected the big lie. >> that is a really good point. that's why we love you, claire, that is a great point. for those of you who forget who jim jordan is, you might want to turn the volume down just a skosh on your tvs before i play this. >> i don't know why you won't give us what we asked for. >> i hope your colleagues are not unde

cove project. >> the jordan cove l.n.g.minal is in a very populated part of our coast. there would be over 10,000 people in a hazardous burn zone if anything was to go wrong. and we know that we're long overdue for a earthquake and tsunami on the oregon coast. >> reporter: the proposed export terminal sits next to what's called the cascadia subduction zone, an area that scientists say is at risk of a major earthquake in the next 50 years. but it's not just the location of the terminal that concerns rosenbluth; she objects to the entire project. coos bay will need to be dredged to make room for the large transport ships, possibly disrupting fisheries. the pipeline would travel under hundreds of waterways, and rosenbluth worries chemicals used during drilling might leak into rivers. and she points to a 2014 incident in neighboring washington where a natural gas plant exploded, injuring five workers and forcing hundreds to evacuate. but the opposition isn't focused entirely on the environment. >> this is another trauma. we're

jim banks of indiana and jim jordan of ohio. same chamber that was barricaded against a violent member before to overturn election results. congressman mccarthy had this to say. >> house democrats must answer this question. why are you allowing a lame-duck speaker to destroy this institution? this is the people's house, not pelosi's. >> now, keeping him honest. congressman mccarthy, who accused the speaker of destroying the institution, voted to overturn election results just hours after the attack. and in the wake of it, liz cheney out of republican leadership. she is still on the republican leadership and said this about speaker pelosi's decision. >> i agree with what the speaker has done. >> and also, mccarthy, of course, wants to become speaker, next year. do you think that he deserves to be speaker, in the aftermath of his actions here? >> i think that any person, who would be third in line to the presidency, must demonstrate a commitment to the constitution and a commitment to the rule of law. and minority leader mccarthy

i'll defer to representative jordan. >> why don't the democrats want to get to the truth? why don't they want to answer the fundamental question, which is why it wasn't there better security posture on that day? read from a news account february this year, pelosi's office previously impressed upon the sgt. of arms that the national guard was to remain off cap grounds. early told t ministration the opposite. while the democrats are concerned are they so concerned how it wouldld look? because what happened, all driven by what happened were democrats normalized anarchy, normalized political violence, raised bail money for the rioters and looters who destroyed small businesses, i talked innocent civilians and maybe most important, attacked police officers. when you spent your talking about defundinghaha police and actually defund police, it's hard to have more police here january 6 like they should have done. that's the fundamental question and why this has turned into such a political charade. the police officers who will testify today and frankly, all capitol police officers

is representative of more than just jim jordan.e in what he does on a number of different issues. i think pelosi should have left him in. to take away the legitimacy to give kevin mccarthy the argument today, look at this, you can't trust these folks, we tried to give them republicans, wouldn't take it, i think she made a mistake and now this commission will argued political by republicans where if you had republicans she could say i gave jim jordan his say and here's the report anyway. >> what about chain yippy . >> what about lizin cha . >> what about liz cheney. >> she doesn't count because the republicans already decided. >> if that's the barometer, marjorie taylor greene is a republican of good standing. if he had put her on the committee would have that been okay as well? >> she's a pretty junior member of the congress. >> that's one deficiency. >> he picked two people who are representative of a good chunk of the conference who were prominent during the impe impeachment, we participate in that why not this. i think it was pr

jordan has a conflict of interest. he was one of the ultra right-wing republicans who went and met with trump to plan for the vote on certifying the electoral college. so that's a conflict of interest right there. and of course banks, as soon as he was appointed, had this hysterical statement including things like make no mistake, nancy pelosi created this committee to justify the left os authoritarian agenda. the capitol was breached for the first time since 1814 in the war of 1812 with the brits. that's not pursuing a leftist authoritarian agenda. >> just one point that i was surprised by, paul, when we're talking about intellect. one thing i was surprised by. she said, nancy pelosi said i think either on monday or tuesday that vote, past votes would not be disqualifying as it related to serving on this committee. but then she picked jordan and banks and said no to them. and in her statement today explaining it, she said something about their actions and past statements or something like that, that that was the reaso

jim jordan is ranking member of the judiciary committee. they represent millions of constituents across this country who feel like their voice has now been silenced and so when we talk about making sure we know what happens and why it will never happen again well such remember for the last six months people have been able to come because of it. for much of that kind with guard soldiers on the ground. these grounds were protected by fencing and razor wire. this is more important than what we're doing here and what we're doing. we have to make sure that never happens again. we have to protect the people who work year. we have to protect the press who covers displaced equipped to protect our law enforcement. we have to protect our staff and we have to do it in a way where the american people still have access to the people's house. you simply cannot do that with a partisan hearing by silencing the voices of millions of american voters and that's exactly what happened and that's why we are so angry, frustrated and upset right now. with that i w

jordan henderson _ there's another one! jordan henderson has _ there's another one!n henderson has his first - there's another one! jordan | henderson has his first goal there's another one! jordan - henderson has his first goal for england! henderson has his first goal for encland! ., henderson has his first goal for encland! . :: ., england! full-time and 4-0 to encland england! full-time and 4-0 to england who — england! full-time and 4-0 to england who have _ england! full-time and 4-0 to england who have beaten - england! full-time and 4-0 to i england who have beaten ukraine england! full-time and 4-0 to - england who have beaten ukraine to progress to the semifinals of euro 2020. england will play denmark on wednesday in their first year i set meat for 25 years.— meat for 25 years. they managed every phase _ meat for 25 years. they managed every phase of — meat for 25 years. they managed every phase of the _ meat for 25 years. they managed every phase of the game - meat for 25 years. they managed every phase of the game and - meat for 25 years. they managed ev

she now has her sights on jim jordan. committee and this new book "i alone can fix it" reports an encounter that you had with him. you told him, "get away from me. you did this." what did you mean by "you did this" and do you think jordan should be called to testify? >> you know, i think congressman jordan may well be a material witness. he's somebody who was involved in a number of meetings in the lead-up to what happened on january 6th, involved in planning for january 6th, certainly for the objections that day as he said publicly. so he may well be a material witness. >> so, jake sherman, it's my bet that kevin mccarthy and jim jordan and liz cheney in an elevator ride together is something that you'd love to experience. talk about liz cheney really articulating a witness list of the trumpiest of trumpy house members who in her view are material witnesses to the deadly insurrection of january 6th. >> great to be with you, nicolle. the funny thing is and i can't help but mention this is mccarthy and jordan and cheney we

and i think it's really quite interesting before jim jordan was pulled off. he was on fox news the night before or even on the same day. and he telegraphed what he would like to ask questions of the select committee . and then hours later he has cut because it looks like nobody wants to answer the questions that he wants to ask and we're asking on this program. go ahead, debbie. i totally agree. i mean, what's wrong with asking questions? and i will just imagine next year when the republicans take control when they have seen it here have health hearing into different things. and i actually try to democrat leadership, the people that can be placed on their committees. that's wrong. the democrats would be screaming at the top of their wall. and this is a question that i want to know. if you recall, i talked about weapons insurrection. it was called the insurrection from the beginning, i insurrection, if you want to overthrow the government, you're going to have weapons and farms with you. there have been non recovered. this thing was a sad up from the began and

especially after jordan's rejection of former us president donald trump's deal of the sentry. and the king's objection to gulf countries normalizing of relations with israel. of course, the political ramifications of this are many the most important when it's a message to the external actors, as well as the intended actors who may have intentions to destabilize. jordan again that the the state is very strong to it and has been struggling economically for several years. a grown grace of unemployment and discontent has led to sporadic protest, during which prince holmes his name was sometimes taunted by demonstrators who saw him as a symbol of reform. and although the prince has not been put on trial, some believe monday sentencing is a clear message to governments, critics, as we're trying to convince, even so it's at trial by fcc even. so i think this is to be in game one time just to be out of the picture. there was so many, many being as forces. what time is it to be the region? but now i think it's even next to 0. this has arguably been the most controversial case, enjoy th

, jim jordan, you know what? when our cooking laugh yeah. you can laugh because you don't have much of an argument, but you know what? when our cook pony, our component cannot question. william ness is partisanship. you don't appoint an arsonist to investigate the so so no, that's that. so you guys lot. okay, so nancy pelosi isn't partisan. your whole argument collapse or ok exact. right? i want to jot. i want to get everybody. hey, i want to get everybody in the program when every be fair and, and debbie hasn't said one word yet debbie, you have the floor. go ahead. well, to begin with, i will answer your question. tell me what praise i were before i admit that dementia. joe, in here, his caretakers won the presidency. i'm in georgia. i know that the election fraud is being uncovered as we speak. that weather is below nice. that's a lot. that's a lot going on regarding debbie debbie didn't interrupt you ari. debbie didn't interrupt. you going to stop there because i double standard of democrat. why asked year th

, jim jordan, you know what, when our cooking laugh yeah. you can laugh because you don't have much of an argument. but you know what? when our cook pony, our coupon cannot question william ness is partisanship. you don't appoint an arsonist to investigate the fun so so no, that's bad. so you guys law. ok so nancy pelosi isn't partisan. your whole argument collapse. ok exact right. i want to jot. i want to get everybody, hey, i want to get everybody in the program when every be parent and debbie hasn't said one word yet debbie, you have the floor. go ahead. well, to begin with, i will answer his question. tell what trees were before i admit that to meet you joe, and hear his caretakers won the presidency. i mean in georgia, i know that the election fraud is being uncovered as we speak. that would causes bologna. that's a lot. that's our law. you can go on air regarding debbie. debbie didn't interrupt you. alright, debbie up to go drop there because i live double standard, a democrat. why asked year there were 25 people killed and she and b l

you know, banks and jordan. i think the speaker showed today that if we're going to make sure that we understand how this happened, what donald trump's role was, why the capitol wasn't better protected and make sure that it never happens again when we have to certify elections in the future, we need a serious approach. kevin mccarthy is just not up for that job. >> congressman swalwell, i agree with you and i think the american people agree with you that there needs to be a serious investigation. but can there be a serious investigation if there aren't more republicans on that committee, more republicans other than congresswoman liz cheney? >> yes, there will be. this investigation will animate what happened that day next week with the police officers who were there to provide first and foremost, jonathan, that ground truth that republicans are trying to erase every day. but take a step back and ask yourself what republicans can be serious about it, because this is a party that is sympathizing with the cop kille

jordan is very good at investigation. and you know, the legal system, well, you know, constitutional norm, well, yes, obviously he's conservative, but at least he has truck constituents. and many people, even people that were present when shrunk, spoke on january people that had no part in any violence of the capital. and so that would bring some legitimacy to that, the democrats want none of that, but i have a real problem with a lot of this. and there are a couple of points here. so we were talking about a court of law investigation trying to find the truth. i mean, the legal system in america, the legal country and other than in your gym when you get evidence. and so me, if somebody who i wasn't there january, i wasn't, you know, present. i of course, i know some people that were most that didn't go inside only didn't go inside, but a lot of it i got from, from social media, from videos. i have seen more videos posted on social media, not media course. those are blocked down more videos and assuming you mean if we will

jordan, mr. banks, from the committee, but really in effect they had completely disqualified themselves in their thoughts and in their actions. imagine the deflection that mr. jordan attempts there. it's torturous. it's not going to convince anybody that somehow this is an investigation of speaker pelosi. what happened on january the 6th, and thank you for recognizing i was there. it's still -- it's still incomprehensible to me that that happened. that americans incited by an american president attacked americans, using our flag, using a trump flag, beating other members -- they would have beaten any one of us and would have killed any one of us. they would not have distinguished if i was a republican or democrat. they came to hang, to assassinate, to kill, to do violence. so the speaker has done the right thing. what we must get at, now six months after this insurrection are the facts and the truth. let them take us where they may. it may tell us that some people were involved. it may tell us th

the book recounts her rant about jordan, quote, that f'ing guy jim jordan, that son of a b. while these maniacs are going through the place i'm standing in the aisle and he said we need to get the ladies away from the aisle. let me help you. i smacked his hand away and told him get away from me, you f'ing did this, cheney reportedly said. of course if none of mccarthy's picks are rejected, cheney and jim jordan will soon serve together on that committee. cheney is the lone republican selected by nancy pelosi for the committee. of course the disinformation, the distractions and the deflections we can expect from the likes of jim jordan has been known to turn many a committee hearing into a partisan spectacle will quickly be confronted by the reality as presented by the very first witnesses the committee is expected to hear next week when the investigation officially gets under way. four police officers who were on the scene on january 6th who have been vocal about the horrors they witnessed at the hands of donald trump supporters and their frustration with republicans' inacti

here is the aforementioned statement from jim jordan many i wi.on the other side. >> we know what this is about. this is about going after president trump. i mean the democrats, they don't want to talk about anything else. they've got to talk about this. >> what do you say to that? >> well, this is about not -- it is about us stopping another insurrection, and it is not just donald trump. it is the enablers like jim jordan, like stephen millers, the people that were in the media, in the punditry world that helped build up the insurrection of january 6th. so it is not just about donald trump. this is about our country. it is about our country and preserving democracy and the safe transferring of power from one party to another. that's why jim jordan wants to distract about this, because when we start to get down to the meat of it we will see there were certain republicans and certain trump enablers that put this country on a lifeline and nearly destroyed our wonderful democracy. this is why people like jim jordan should not be anywhere near this se