in jordan edwards' case, they said no, what roy oliver, a man who lifted a rifle at a car full of teenagersooting into the car, striking jordan in the head and killing him, police officers stood up at that point in the dallas community and said that was not reasonable, hats off to them. and if i might compare to bolton jean, and the police officer on trial in that case was amber guyger. in that case, there was texas rangers who wanted to testify that what amber guyger did was according to her training, the judge in that case did not allow the that testimony to go forward, changed the trajectory of the case and it resulted in a conviction of amber guyger. again, when police officers stand up and intervene and say this is not okay, even if it's what our training tells us to do, it's not reasonable you see some of the rare convictions. the truth is we need to change the law and the training. . >> the argument for qualified immunity is it's difficult enough for law enforcement to do their jobs but the supreme court is considering hearing a case that would challenge this. that's lee merritt, tha