construction and this is contrary to city ordinance passed in the 1974 and signed by then mayor joseph oliotto and officially recorded in the documents of san francisco. that was the mayorville antique's ordinance. and that ordinance described the l-shaped lot, that entire lot as the antique's historical landmark 58. go back and check the law. as president zwigg just got done saying, go by the letter of the law and that's an ordinance on the books of the city of san francisco. i would just mention the bush street impact of the building that will have eight residential units but only one parking space. what's going to happen to those seven other cars. pugbucannon street has had truck traffic with safeway and the post office and just the normal traffic. what kind of congestion will that be causing? so my question to you, commissioners, is why is the city planning department, why have they violated the 1974 ordinance, the letter of the law, and why are they allowing the developer to violate this section 134 of the planning code with this rare yard requirement? thank you. want me to fill out a car