that's why the man who attend line joseph stalin back in the late 19 forties, miscalculated in applying, quote, unquote brute force to its neighbors. and i'm sure it's a tantalizing and very gratifying comparison to force some of your readers. but what makes you believe that the russia as a stay in its current form, is left by the same expansionist, self aggrandizing ideological aspirations as the soviet union was after the 2nd world war? absolutely, frank, it absolutely is not. russia is a defensive country and a defensive force and is just looking to secure its voters. it is absolutely not the country that the soviet union was. and the analogy which i brought in on there in the report that i was written is about how that can be miscalculations in terms of responses from the from the other side. even at that point of time. ok, joseph stalin did not wish to bring upon the sort of school war containment that the americans brought on. and to be very frank, the americans over played the hand at that point of time in the late 1940 s. but america was so powerful at that point of time that it

that's why the man who attend live joseph stalin, back in the late 1940 s, miscalculated in applying, quote, unquote brute force to its neighbors. and i'm sure it's a tantalizing and very gratifying comparison to force some of your readers. but what makes you believe that russia as a stay in its current form, is led by the same expansion is self aggrandizing ideological aspirations as the soviet union was after the 2nd world war. absolutely, thank it. absolutely is not. russia is a defensive country and a defensive force and is just looking to secure its voters. it is absolutely not the country that the soviet union was. and, and the analogy which i brought in out there in the report that i was written is about how that can be miscalculations in terms of responses from the, from the other side. even at that point of time. ok, joseph stalin did not wish to bring upon the sort of school walk containment that the americans brought on. and to be very frank, the americans over played the hand at that point of time in the late 1940 s. but america was so powerful at that point of time that i

column to create an alternative western way of life based on the idea of ​​social justice, like joseph stalinianic ideas are not invented. they are born in the struggle during the crisis, the nomads and the khazars, if i understand correctly, the globalists are their allies, or rather their agents in russia are the winner, indeed. it can only be something, like neoprichinina. it is also the conditions for creating a new socio-economic structure based on the principles of social justice, first of all. a fair distribution of the national product is necessary. and it is necessary to start with the constitution on the one hand. it is necessary to bring the reality in accordance with a number of its provisions, for example, that russia is a social state is very important. on the other hand, to remove those provisions that yeltsin's khalui concocted under the dictation of american consultants, for example, and to accept international law over russian. how that international law is chosen, when it is beneficial to a certain circle in the west, just like that, so calmly, there is no solution. yes, wh

correspondent: for more than 30 years they have been cataloguing victims of joseph stalin's terror andabuses in modern russia. the authorities have shut it down, but it is still trying to operate. >> will the price lead to less pressure on us by authorities? no, it will only increase. our authorities will say right, the fifth column and they got a nobel prize. we will show you how we restore order in our country. correspondent: eight prestigious peace prize for russia's rights group will not impress president putin. at the very least it is a show of solidarity to those inside this country who still believe it is possible to build here a civil society. do not expect the kremlin to help. anchor: the king of thailand and has made a rare public appearance going to a hospital to meet the survivors of thursday's attack. across our land flags are flying at half mast for the 23 children who were murdered by a former police officer in there nursery school. at least 36 people were killed in the attack. a warning, you may find some of the pictures in this report distressing. correspondent: how do

when joseph stalin, an adult, hitler agreed to a non aggression pat, arguably, paving the way for world war that started one week later. over time, stollins legacy, one 3rd discredited, has been rehabilitated in 2019. the survey by the nevada sent around 70 percent of russia thought he had played a positive role in russian history. a lot of city, mcguire, people are constantly told that without starlin the russians would not have on the warble stallion near dilemma by the other up by the other naturally might stand in portugal. treatin has nothing else to offer russian citizens, but we cannot offer them well from prosperity. and that is why he is only offering thy myths of some great periods in history and yet come really come, brought. having shaped a grand historical narrative about russia's place in the world, vladimir putin now once to protect it. a new national security strategy find by putin and 2021 says traditional russian values and historical memory are under attack and must be defended at all. and yet young is fragile for russia invaded ukraine. the sweeney putin once more re

central committee in the cpsu or brazil of the central committee of the cpsu during you also saw joseph stalinexactly the same faces, there were no smiles, and it is absolutely obvious because these people knew that they were hostages of the regime of sole power of vladimir putin, by the way, thanks to the annexation of crimea and the war against ukraine, it was possible to form such a regime of one-man power and it is a fact that when kadirovshi begins to move, well, there cannot be such a confrontation , the head of one of the subsidized regions of the russian federation cannot oppose the minister of defense of the russian federation, this is exclusively such a controlled story and another putin special operation that let's tickle the nerves of the military, show them that we e- we can change each of them at any time, and even a person who is a close personal friend of putin, sergei shoigu, but you know , try to understand chekhov's logic, it's yourself don't respect, tell me if the regime is one-man or when the regime of one-man rule starts to fall, it's from the outside somehow you can see

potsdam conference in europe where he would meet with the british prime minister and soviet premier joseph stalin. during this visit to kansas city, truman remarked, when i come to jackson, i can't realize that i am the president in these days. i feel like i'm just one of your fellow citizens. i see the same faces, i try to talk to the same people. well, some of those same faces and same people included the military bodies, old business partners, of course, members of kansas city's famous pendergast political machine. the story of machine politics in this town is well known. briefly, during the early 20th century, the city was controlled by the expanding democratic organization of jackson county, the official name of the machine. a dizzying array of business connections including beverage and construction contracts, provide a financial base from which the machines enter the city, county, and then state politics. the pendergast first -- and then younger brother tom controlled the city manager's office and from there the city council. they handpicked the mayor as well as every other key office in c

remember that joseph stalin and benito mussolini also were nominated for the nobel peace prize. and there are such, er, thank god that they did not receive it, because such a thing simply could not happen. was nominated for this prize several times and in 1948 they finally wanted to give him such a prize, but he was just killed and that's why this year they didn't even award this prize. it means that she is not worthy to receive the prize, and novaslav havel, too, and other very worthy people could kill the former secretary general of the united nations, they could also receive this prize. and there is a great deal of debate as to whether the ee are really worthy laureates who received it, the same mikhail gorbachev received it in the 1990s, and after that the soviet union collapsed, he was more popular . mikhail gorbachev recently killed us in the west. he is more popular than in the soviet union. who remembers those times ? well, if you would ask the lithuanians, and i think that they would be against gorbachev receiving this peace prize, it's 100%, yes. and that is, for one s

ukrainian nationalists have historically venerated traditional parts isn't guerrilla warfare, even joseph stalin, back in the fifty's with his iris. it's back to school in the process foolish. we are now seeing, even than that, conduct literature more and more support from western an american. what would these kind of insurgency, how do you think russia should address it as a threat? again, not from a moral perspective, but from strategic and tactical perspective. she did, i will get on with the, you know, it will become, you know, it was a full time. it was sort of this issues off on spent in so many of them the new because the population, even if the friend them this or and if it comes out of the site, they will be substantial population. this been not be in favor of us. everybody is not going to believe that because, i mean if you look at their figures for the referenda, the support is overwhelming. and again the crimea, and example. sure there were some people who were not very happy with the russians coming in. but the overwhelming majority of people in crimea supported and crimea by and la

i would say that it imitates the worst practices of the regimes of the twins joseph stalin and adolf hitler, these idols of vladimir putin, it passed in the real offensive, now it is not even about the fact that you may have different political views, you may have the same views as the president of the russian federation, but you should not name things as you know, now they are really trying to do everything possible not to call a war a war, only representatives of the closest circle of the russian president vladimir putin can call a war a war, here we saw what the first deputy head of the presidential administration of russia sergey kiriyenko said about the war, however, he emphasizes that russia must win this war , that it must become a nation for russians, well, from the rostrum of the state duma of the russian federation, the head of the russian communist party spoke about the war gennady zyuganov, who also called for winning this war, but some other person who, let's say, does not want the russian federation to aggressively win the war and at the same time does not want to call

that's why the man who attend live joseph stalin, back in the late 19 forties. miscalculated in applying, quote, unquote brute force to its neighbors. and i'm sure it's a tantalizing and very gratifying comparison to force some of your readers. but what makes you believe that russia as a stay in its current form, is led by the same expansion is self aggrandizing ideological aspirations. as the soviet union was after the 2nd world war, i'll be absolutely thank it. absolutely is not. russia is in defensive country and in a defensive force and as just looking to secure its borders, it is absolutely not the country that the soviet union was. and, and the analogy which i brought in out there.

actually, i think vladimir putin is not the equivalent of adolf hitler or joseph stalin, yes, he personifiesnal, there are many he should bear responsibility and be justly punished, but to call him hitler is to indulge in emotional rhetoric, when putin calls ukrainians nazis, in the end, he exposes consider himself a fool because zelensky and the minister of defense of ukraine are people of jewish origin. so the world is laughing at him. the president of russia looks detached from reality. he also says that before the start of the large-scale invasion, putin was in a winning position, but after starting this offensive , he immediately lost abrary before the invasion in february . i wrote all for a canadian newspaper, where he said if putin stops now, if he puts pressure on ukraine , on europe, he will win, but as soon as he sent his troops to the territory of all of ukraine, he he lost, he forever separated the ukrainians from the russians adverts the russian war in ukraine, lubomyr lutsyuk believes, in the future has every reason to qualify as genocide and that is how it will probably be wr

ok, joseph stalin did not wish to bring upon the sort of school walk containment that the americans brought on. and to be very frank, the americans over clear the hand at that point of time in the late 1940 s. but america was so powerful at that point of time that it couldn't get away with that and it could create the institutions like it did, you know, the marshall plan and the nato, etc, etc. that was successful. the americans mistakenly believe that they can do that today. they are not in that position and power to do that today. but that having being said, the analogy that i wanted to bring out here was that mister putin's actions have provoked the response that most unexpected at most schools and, and to which to some extent have under cut to it's broader geopolitical positioning in the end. i think it's pretty clear that any incursion into another country is bound to have pretty serious ramifications. and i think the kremlin was fully aware of that from the get go. but there is also a lot of discussion here in russia about how the ukranian operation and the very likely admission of th

under joseph stalin. read me a 14 through a ton of letting me put him, was disappointed by the demise of the soviet union of high height. after taking office. he called it the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th century, hector russian ortho boris icon. it has been living in exile in london since 2014 sequel i le premier siege. susan behaves a lot like emperor nicholas the 1st as eco acount is worried about putins. authoritarian under tons attempted earliest a gluten is an inferior literally, she missed all jet for the power russia once had, he had a true story. i left russia we because i didn't want to live in a country like talking korea. as each cyril mccurry, he sees putin as a desperate who is completely detached from the real world. that goes only when you might stood julia quickly, you put it into a little half to understand that he doesn't even know how to use the internet. couple of you, but he gets his information from printed reports that his intelligence serves to send him. you've war a

he probably imagines himself as joseph stalin.on't know what kind of person he will be there he is delusional. well, the decorated kadyrov is literally standing there and telling him what to do. and that is why they are dangerous because they are terrorists in the literal sense. well, it is difficult to draw a line, of course, between gerasim and other russian soldiers , they are all war criminals, but we will say so what even they have what it’s like to be a person, these war criminals have some shores, some frameworks, but prigozhin from kadirovan doesn’t have them. i would like to ask you now to predict what the winter campaign of russian crimes against the objects of the civil infrastructure of ukraine will look like, what goals do they pursue in your opinion , because they work systematically on energy objects, continue to destroy the entire energy sphere of ukraine, destroy the communal sphere, here we are we see that today there were blows and the water disappeared for the first time in many, let's say so months ago, their

people are always afraid of such leaders and that is why the most disgusting of them, such as joseph stalint's say, managed to rule over their own people for decades compatriots because they simply lived in a state of shame and were aware that all these crimes that occur in the territories of others or these crimes that occur with their friends and neighbors can happen to them at any moment. now we will answer your questions, which are already here i will start right away with a question that concerns china. iryna ozlova asks us this dian-ping, re-elected general secretary of the communist party of china for the third time, putin congratulated the first, how will relations between russia and china develop, will china put pressure on putin to he stopped the war, what support from china does russia count on, relations between russia and china, these are relations between strategic allies, these are two authoritarian regimes, and they follow the same path, these are regimes of one-person leadership, and this is not just a regime of one-person leadership, these are regimes in which the first pe

the chanka still ceded power to the communist regime led by maus zadun, connected to moscow with joseph stalinthe only thing that could to do then the united states to ensure the evacuation of this government and a thousand supporters to the island of taiwan and from that moment the united states gave appropriate legal guarantees to this government that they would protect it democratic choice, ukraine does not have such legally formalized guarantees. the budapest memorandum, which everyone complains about, is only a document that we paid for our independence , because the independence of the recognition of ukraine as an independent state in general, like other former soviet republics, was focused on the fact that nuclear weapons will remain in the same hands in even more so for moscow. neither ukraine nor other countries that had nuclear weapons had any real access to them. these nuclear weapons had to be written off in the near future. in 6-7 years, that is, it is all an illusion of nuclear arsenals, it is another matter if we wanted to become a real nuclear state, but the question arises as

i'm looking forward to the conclusion to now that you wrote not so long ago that live in live, joseph stalin, back in the late 19 forties. miscalculated in applying, quote, unquote brute force to its neighbors. and i'm sure it's a tantalizing and very gratifying comparison to force some of your readers. but what makes you believe that russia as a stay in its current form, is led by the same expansionist self aggrandizing.

was, of course, the fears not only of him, but also of the leader and head of the soviet union, joseph stalin the marshall plan would allow the united states. america to gain complete control not only over europe not only over that part of europe that the soviet union controlled becomes the soviet union itself the genius of the marshall plan that this is colossal the impact of pouring into europe to restore europe and make it completely dependent on america europe became a huge market for american goods. credits issued by us banks were spent on american exports. goods - this significantly accelerated the growth of the american economy, while the americans at the same time tried to ensure that the marshall plan was extended to the future socialist states. that is, there was a hope that this economic assistance would make it possible to influence a's political decisions and a's political the model of the countries of the social bloc, yes, these are the partners of the soviet union and the soviet union itself, of course, for the soviet union this was unacceptable the soviet union already at that

when american forces i but then for me to say i'm so sorry we don't have a statue of joseph stalin andein? know. we are a d better plan it without them but how do you arrive at decisions for people who are represented by statues who have not been around for 150 years or 200 years? or something has to be more of a process that i have seen in some of the latest wave of statues removals and so we develop a decision tree that basically said let's ask a series of questions and depending on the answer to the first we depend on the second and then so on. there is no guarantee in this decision tree and then we look at this logically and come to the conclusion as a result of aa process and not just impulse.f and if at the end of the process we decide this i think it endangers our understanding of history when we respond to these memorials and the monuments. shirley out of a quasi- irrational impulsiveness and that contains the real danger because is not a big difference between that irrational impulse and the behavior of the mob and that is exactly what democracy and societies strive between an

they are behind the 1619 project, "new york times" lied to american people on behalf of joseph stalind new york times covered up holocaust, and lied about third reich, they were asked to by roosevelt and owners of newspaper were concerned that people would be critical of new york times. and so it has chief correspondent and berlin, a man who sympathized with t the nazis, n "new york times" brought us castro. they breathed life into his revolution. the people of cuba have suffered since, and "new york times" caught time again with hires s anti-semitism. let's look at democrat party's history. was party of confederacy. president of confederacy jefferson davis was a democrat, generals were democrats, the kkk was spawned out of confederacy and embraced by democrat party, to oppose reconciliation and that is what they did. took a republican president, grant to send u.s. army to 29 wipe c them out. the klan prospered. segregation. plessy versus ferguson. supreme court gone rogue, again. democrat party. pushing segregations for another hundred years after the civil war, supreme court stepped

after its ally germany in america, they were already choosing targets on the territory of the ussr joseph stalinas not shocked when he found out about it. however, he was greatly impressed by more than 100,000 bits of hundreds of thousands of wounded and crippled and that's it. this is the result of the explosion of two bombs and in 1949 stalin tested his own atomic bomb. tank inverted by shock wave burns up to 4000 meters and disease radiation sickness up to 1800 meters, stalin also ordered the construction of dozens of airfields in the arctic and the subsequent deployment of 10,000 long-range bombers on them. why did stalin believe that the cold war would sooner or later turn into a third world war? the first serious clash between the ussr and the usa took place in europe because of west berlin, stalin decided to demolish this island of the western world, which so clearly testified to the advantages of the western system. in 1948, by order from moscow, for one at night, all roads and communications leading to west berlin were blocked. 2 million people were left without electricity, heating, wa

of the state and enemies of the people was he aware that was one of the favorite expressions of joseph stalinlini? a favorite dictators and an american president uses that kind of expression to define an american journalist i felt horrible and felt the need to write the book enemy of the people. but more terrifying than that the president used that expression very effectively and tens of millions of americans citizens believed him. that result right now many people in this country 60 percent of people and the american polls do not believe joe biden won the election fairly. 52 percent of republicans believe the press deliberately distorted the results of the american presidential campaign why do they believe that? because trump said so and then a lot of people who represent part of the american press corps who simply feel it is in their interest i only financial and not political but interest to propaganda this idea it's dangerous for democracy inor journalism and for the american people that i sincerely hope that more and more will understand there is a distinction between a full press and on

find themselves in slavery and that's tragic and ultimately collapses into the single war with joseph stalin or putin and china and the idea of a collective rule with great human freedom starts like that but that's not how it ends. marxism is capable and is noted capable because it fails sog often. it's so important and stalin and to xi in china and putin in russia. xi in china is picking up 11 different actresses have disappeared in china and that's where there's a massive disappearance maderr to interact on the right political line. >> that begs the question why would stalin want to kill a ballerina that seems harmless and traveled 4,000 miles with her dance and represented everything stalin couldn't stand and it was very much that he continued the production of cultural. >> she wouldn't come back and declared in 1927 she's in with the people. >> there was no understudy and she wass the greatest dapser in the world. >> i believe there's 37 biographies written about her and surprisingly no one accused stalin of poisoning her. when you do reservice connected and find that she gained circumst

they tore down joseph stalin in 2003 when american forces, one of the first things is the tearing down of a statue of saddam hussein. i'm sorry we don't have a statue of joseph stalin and saddam hussein, we are better planet without them. and they haven't been around for 150 years or 200 years and there has to be something of a process with some of the latest wave. and the decision tree which basically, a series of 5 questions and moving to the second depending on the answer to the second, third and so forth. there is no guarantee in this decision tree. not intended to produce a certain result but is intended to produce you have thought through this. we have looked at this logically. we have come to this conclusion as a result of his process and not just on impulse. if at the end of the process we decide the statute should be removed, at least we've done with process. the thing i have been concerned about that endangers our understanding of history is when we respond to these memorials and monuments, a quasi-irrational impulsiveness, that contains the real danger because it is not a di

i'm not going to sit here and say i'm so sorry we don't have a statue of joseph stalin or saddam hussein these days. i think we are better planet without them but how do we arrive at decisions for people who are represented by statues that haven't and around for 150 years or something like that? i think there has to be something more for process than i've seen in some of the latest waves of statue toppling. we developed the decision tree which basically said let's ask a series of questions. let's ask a series of five questions and depending on the answer too the first question we have moved to the second and depending on its second t week moved to the third. there's no guarantee for this decision tree. there's no guarantee at all. it's not intended to produce a circumstance. what it is intended to produce as we have thought through w th. we have looked at this logic. we have come to this conclusion as a result of a process. and if at the end of that process weth decide yes the stae should come down then fine. at least we know there was a process that the thing i havee the most concerned

what happened was joseph stalin had died. emma stalin's death that open the door for a negotiated solution and he said things were wrapped up in no time. he said it was so noticeable it was so obvious something monumental had happened and they were able to connect it to stalin's death. weatherstone's death open the door for north korean or red that is an opportunity because there is a bit of a power vacuum to act on her own behalf and do this. i do not know. but he noticed a significant difference once and of course by 1953 as well we had a presidential election year on dwight d eisenhower was elected president. eisenhower threatened that he would go over too korea and personally and if necessary he would use nuclear weapons to bring this thing to an end. so i think the combination of stalin's death, : : : >> okay, you are here.

that's tragic and it ultimately collapses to a ruler as joseph stalin or putin.s a rule with the great human trade starts like that but that's not how it ends. marxism is not capable because it fails so often that's why controlling the mind of man who is so important to stalin and now in china and putin in russia that's why china is picking up 11 different actresses that have disappeared in china. m that's why there is a massive disappearance made by the dozens seems to be on the right political line. >> why would stalin want to kill a ballerina who seems harmless but she traveled over 400,000 miles in the days before air travel and represented everything stalin couldn't stand. it was an independent free thought and continue the doctrine of cultural hegemony as mentioned earlier to control men you have to control your mind and thoughts, music and everything and she was a direct threat to them. >> they sent her mother from russia to try to get her to come back but she wouldn't. they sent an invitation to come back. they declared 1927 an enemy of the soviet people

uh, in this regard, the orders of joseph stalin retained this name only in moscow, and the great cultural construction of the young soviet country is proceeding at an accelerated pace, and it is replacing the old bourgeois values. new genre socialist realism opera and ballet found themselves between a rock and a hard place before art is the question of whether to be forgotten forever or to rebuild in a new way, there were heated discussions, even on the pages of the media. do we need ballet and is it really an art? or does it just mean a demonstration of naked female legs and so on, yes, but still, it means that common sense also won the ballet classics. she took her place of honor. i don't know where i'm going to work no pluralism i don't care i stop my activity as president of the ussr who almost ruined the construction site of the century was soup on former employees took place somewhere around 47 witnesses, the phantom of the opera, as a legendary theater actually survived the war and its peace lay in this basement red terror, who until the last fought for the color of the cult buildi

and enemies of the people, was he aware that expression was one of the favorite expressions of joseph stalin and the soviet union and china in the selena initially in other words, the dictators. i can be communist or fascist dictators in an american president, uses kind of expression to define an american journalist, found horrible and why wanted to write enemy of the people, the book. and even more terrifying than that, the president used that expression very effectively and many many, again, tens of millions of american citizens believed him. there is already out out that many people in this country, pu60 percent of the people in te republican party according to recent polls, do not believe the joe biden one the election fairly. 52 percent of the republicans believe that the press deliberately distorted result of the american presidential campaign. why would they believe that. because donald trump said so and then a lot of people who represent part of the american press corps, simply feel that it is in their interest i'm not quite sure, maybe financial and i hope not political, the interes