and the name of the article that josh blackman that i wrote is called "keeping pandora's box sealed". if you google my name and pandora, you're come up with it. i never thought we'd be talking about the immunity clause or 14th amendment in the context of guns. you might have seen some references in the media about the difference in this case that have come out between the gun nuts and the constitution nuts. i'm firmly on the side of the constitution nuts. so it's a little odd that, i guess, it falls to me, after these two accomplished scholars to be the first one to actually talk about guns in this context. and the thing is, this has been a long term project of scholars from across the ideological perspective, to reverse slaughterhouse and revive the privileges or immunities clause. for various reasons, and we've agreed not to talk about the specifics about that diverge, although feel free to ask in the q and a. we never thought the way we'd get to the supreme court with the reinvigoration of as doug's report calls it the gem of the constitution was through guns. through the right to