commission president joshua arce? >> here. >> commission vice president [speaker not understood] is excused. commissioner ruth gravanis? >> here. >> commissioner [speaker not understood]? >> here. >> commissioner heather stephenson? >> here. >> commissioner heather wall? >> here. >> [speaker not understood]? >> here. >> next item on the agenda is the approval of minutes of the november 12, 2013 commission on the environment special meeting retreat and december 3, 2013 rescheduled meeting. commissioners, in your packet you have november 12 and december 3rd draft minutes. this is a discussion and action item. ~ >> colleagues, unless there is any discussion, can i get a motion to approve the minutes? >> motion. >> so moved. >> seconded. >> . by commissioner wan [speaker not understood]. all those in favor say aye 2a aye. >> it is approved. >> [speaker not understood]. next item on the agenda -- >> there is [speaker not understood]. >> on the meeting minutes? >> [speaker not understood] public comment? >> very soon. >> th

sponsored speaker is commissioner joshua arce. this is a discussion item. >> okay, colleagues. so, david osman is our acting director for this meeting, but melanie is still with us through the end of the week. we wanted to use this as an opportunity to bring the commission up to speed on the process of searching for our next director of the department. and for those that have been involved in the past search that led us to melanie and 3-1/2 great years of working with her, it's going to sound familiar because in many ways it's patterned after that process. it's also been -- we looked at a couple other processes particularly in regard to a search that commissioner wan was involved with with the juvenile probation commission when she was commissioner over there. and they went through a search. but what i wanted to kind of share is where we currently stand in terms of the process. and several commissioners really wanted to be active in having this conversation here to talk about what questions we want to ask in this process and what we think we're looking for as we go out there an

commission president joshua arce? >> here. >> commission vice president [speaker not understood] is excused. commissioner ruth gravanis? >> here. >> commissioner [speaker not understood]? >> here. >> commissioner heather stephenson? >> here. >> commissioner heather wall? >> here. >> [speaker not understood]? >> here. >> next item on the agenda is the approval of minutes of the november 12, 2013 commission on the environment special meeting retreat and december 3, 2013 rescheduled meeting. commissioners, in your packet you have november 12 and december 3rd draft minutes. this is a discussion and action item. ~ >> colleagues, unless

speaker today is commissioner joshua arce. >> so, colleagues, as we all know as we have been talking about in our different times when we get together where it's a few days now at the end of the week of this weekend, director nutter is leaving us. and we thought that we wanted to thank you and to commend you for your achievements. we wanted to do that on our agenda. we thought, why not? we didn't kind of know where to put it on the agenda. we said why not put it at the beginning, you know. you can't say thank you enough. and, so, maybe one thing, colleagues, if it's okay, maybe monica can read our resolution that we have to thank director nutter for everything she's done for us and for the city and for the environment. >> commending director melanie nutter, department of the environment. approval of resolution commending director melanie nutter for her service to the department of the environment and to the city and county of san francisco. whereas mayor gavin newsom appointed melanie nutter director for the san francisco department of the environment in august 2010 and whereas melan

related issue with you at the joint meeting february 25th and it's signed commission president joshua arce on behalf of the commission environment policy committee. >> and might be later on folks want to put topics when we have that meeting. so, any other comments, thoughts on this one? >> did you get all of jason's items? >> did i get jason's items on the last piece? >> yes. >> i'll have the question. the 100% renewable energy, does that include any sort of -- to what jason said, does that include the rps mandates or is that in addition to the current statewide rps mandates? >> so, have you seen a copy of the climate energy itself yet? we will get you some. those three different pathways that we calculated, the rps is included in the first two. if we get to 100% renewable, we of course will far exceed the rps standard because all our residents will be on the 100% renewable power. that is taken out so we're not double counting it in our calculations. the part we point out the larger chunk depends on us gets tog 100% renewable [speaker not understood]. there are multiple factors in therein