denied to whatng joshua davey was doing. it was because of what the institution is, a religious institution. the court concludes it is odious to discriminate against religion and term of the aid that it receives. the key issue is going to be how ?ar does this extend does this mean any time at government provides aid, it has to provide the same assistance to religious institution? he said this is just about aid to a playground, nothing more than that. others say this is just about an eight four program -- playground. -- aid for a program. it indicates a really want to overrule locke versus db. he said this is the first time in history that the supreme court has ever found that the government is constitutionally required to give government aid to a religious institution. the firstd to distinction that it was based on any joshua davey was doing, time government does not give aid to religious and the tuition is discriminating against what it is. that would violate the constitution. tos is giving money religious institution, and

he said first in lot versus davey, the aid was being denied because of what joshua davey was doing, going to seminary. this is denying aid because of what the institution is, a religious institution. in lot versus davey, it's about training someone to be a minister and anything would violate the establishment clause, the for him to be trained as a minister. the court concludes and justice roberts says it is odious and was his word to dim nate religion in terms of the aid it receives. the key issue is going to be how far does this extend? does this mean any time the government provides aid to a secular private institution it has to give the same assistance to a religious institution? chief justice roberts addresses that in footnote 3 and he says this is just about aid for a playground but nothing more than that. justice briar write as separate opinion saying this is just about aid for a playground. as i mentioned justice thomas and gorsuch don't join footnote 3. each of them write a separate opinion in which they sharply criticize lot versus davey and indicate they really want to overrule