>> joshua switzky, planning staff, you would only be allocating the amount necessary for any individual projects, and as the proposed amend *f amendments to the motion would not let buildings outside the plan area avail of those unused allocations, so those two scenarios, the unused allocation goes unused forever or the commission could act to reduce the allocations again in the future if there was a real concern about unused allocation. >> i think that concern was expressed today and so i think it's a real one. and i think it actually ends up rewarding development that follows the path of what's been done here and really seriously looking long term on how and when we want growth and what we can do to get it. it doesn't need to be done today but it needs to be done as we jointly and individually look at projects and impacts on parks. >> john from the city attorney's office, i've had a chance to review the letter and i would just like to make a few points about that. the first is that the letter sort of co-mingles what are common terms that are used both in the environmental analysis and

. >> good afternoon, commissioners, i'm joshua switzky with planning department staff. when you approved the transit center plan in may you also approved the plans program implementation document in resolution 18-635. that program implementation document inventories all the public improvements recommended by the plan and lays out a funding program to allocate the projected revenues from the various funding sources to fund those projects. the funding sources include mello-roos district as well as new plan impact fee and other dedicated funding sources outside of the -- whats was implemented through the plan. the program implementation document and the revenues will be allocated and implemented over time through the city's inter agency plan implementation committee which was created by the charter and allocated by the board of supervisors. the implementation document and the funding program while they do lay out sort of a proportionate allocation of revenues, it doesn't express priority in terms of the timing of revenues as they come in. this is a long-term plan, a 20 to

. >> joshua switzky, planning staff, you could adopt a resolution amending the implementation document to add some language regarding priority for chinatown parks or other aspects of the project for early investment from initial impact fees, so you could do that and we could put that on the calendar. >> okay, thank you, that is my intent, that is something i'm interested in, curious to hear what other commissioners would have to say about that. >> commissioner sugaya? >> yes, a couple of questions to staff. the transit center district plan area is larger than the redevelopment area, so it's only within the redevelopment area that certain [inaudible] from the development apply, is that correct? for example, commissioner wu, i think commissioner wu was saying that there was a higher affordable housing component, and that's associated with the redevelopment area, is that correct? >> that's correct. if i can get the slide up there, if i could put the map up to clarify. so, you can see the plan area is the more purely rectangular broader plan area of market street to folsom, the redevelopme