he owns the "wall street journal."loomberg sprung from nowhere to create progress of journalism online. i will respectfully disagree on that. >> thinking about california watch, we feature them regularly, and they are doing excellent investigative work. is anyone familiar with those, and can you talk about the success and where you see that going? do you think that we will see more of these kinds of outlets? >> i think that paying for news journalism and especially for news journalism with a variety of political agendas, historically in san francisco, was paid for by real estate and automotive and help-wanted advertising. it was not paid for by the circulation nichols of the subscribers. if you think about government- boned journalism compared to the rich, benevolent owner boulders of journalism or the public opening of journalism, i think there is a time now where you do not need quite as much funding as ever, but some of the people who today are seen as barron's -- barons started off with a pretty defined journalisti

quality journalism is there. the new part of the media is not a new types of stories being told, but how they are being told, short for nurses long form, and how they are distributed on your one newspaper or magazine or one website, versus to run the mobile universe, or threat the internet universe, portals. do you want to give 30% of revenue to apple in order to distribute it? lots of publishers are making that decision. it is the distribution from free tv to pay tv and the change from the free online destination media to mobile everywhere media and the creation of brands there. along with the business model, that is what we are working on. >> the want to go to the next question. we have to get to everybody. >> my name is peter bergen. i am an investigative reporter. i do not write content, i do not right product. i do news reporting. i do not write material to put ads around. there are some assumptions coming from this gathering that i find troubling. many years ago, upton sinclair wrote a classical study of jo

"wall street journal" is now horribly bias. we kind of adjust our lenses here when you read online and you do not know the person is, it is difficult to know whether it is legitimate or not. newspapers eventually disappear and are no longer published in print, so they are just competing with everyone else. how do we establish -- how do we know -- how to newspapers establish credibility? i saw this news reporter who put a piece on youtube about gavin newsom just walking away. so how did these organizations establish credibility? how are people able to see the problems with bias that will never come up? there is also a problem with advertisers, backers. a millionaire putting $500,000 or $1 million into a newspaper, and he will expect something in return. he may not want his coverage to be negative. so there are all these things. i wondered if anybody had any general comments about those. >> that is a really difficult problem. if we think about the way we understand journalism today, it really is an historical aberration. that is

when i worked at the "journal" i did... i broke atory about bruce babbitt was the interior secretary and he had been involved in approving a license for an indian casino and the lobbyist invold in that had been a college friend and it was a big story at the time and in the end i'm not sure i took fair account of the entirety ofis washington career. that i don't thi he was someone on the scale of influence peddling in washington probably belong flooer the top and i spent an awful long time writing stories about that. >> rose: where do you worry abouin terms of the "times"? for example, some people ask about... there's increasing amount of opinion in the paper. do you worry about that? >> you know, i'm mindful of it and we have columns in the news pages. quite a few of them biz day, quite a few columnist in and, you know, i asked i sometimes read before those columns are published but we have drilled in the editors that there is a line between opinion and urging a specific action and deep analysis and i prefer to be on the si

you are on the "washington journal."ler: the jobs have left america -- occupy wall street should be talking about free trade. when congress gets together and passes these last three trade bills -- watch the jobs had to panama, south korea, and colombia. it's a shame when congress gets together. i would rather they keep fighting. host: let's move on to georgia on the line for democrats. george, you are on the "washington journal." go ahead. caller: i know there are jobs out there. i know there are jobs out there. host: where do you suppose they are? caller: there are jobs in south carolina. it is very hard for anyone to get hired on those jobs. i do not know why they're holding back the jobs. host: are you working right now? caller: no, i am 70 years old. i am retired. host: where are you -- were you working before you retired? caller: at a factory. host: is that factories still open? caller: no, it is closed. host: where are the people who were working in that factory? caller: different places. i'm going to tell you. pre

when i got into the journalism,

we are known for the quality of our journalism. i think people turn to us because they think they are going to read what is confirmed and truthful. >> so your jobs are going to be harder than they used to be? >> in terms of the competition, it is harder, because you have to keep track of so many stories that are breaking at any given moment. to keep our focus on the ones that matter. i think our editors and our reporters are really good. >> all right, give us one thing that you have said to yourself you are going to change at "the new york times." it can be anything. >> about me? >> no, you have watched this paper, and now you are the boss. what is one thing you want to change? >> i do not want every story to be 1800 words. i think, in general, we have a lot along stories that need to be maung, things like the amy harmon profile of young adults with autism -- stories that need to be long. that was very long but worth every word. there is a certain lack of discipline. sometimes a point is repeated too many times in a story, where th

users do identify their journal somehow but they are not amiss in the sense that a journal is not a person. please send a book for. until recently the well known russian fiction writer said again how to live journal page like most authors he hid his identity under a nickname. his page was one of the three most popular russian blogs but when comments on one of his entries erupted in scandal and he started getting death threats he decided to close his account. realize that include an air of privacy because internet is. privacy people need to understand that but artist has santa he has no intention of closing his own project instead he wants to share more information with the world. i figured in my way with this much information that is as i share i live an incredibly anonymous and private life and i wouldn't be able to do that if there wasn't all this information about me in the public because that's really just noise at the end of the day. sam expects most people to follow his example very soon and usher in an era of total information transparency the american artist insists that it

when i worked at the "journal" i did... i broke atory about bruce babbitt was the interior secretary and he had been involved in approving a license for an indian casino and the lobbyist invold in that had been a college friend and it was a big story at the time and in the end i'm not sure i took fair account of the entirety ofis washington career. that i don't thi he was someone on the scale of influence peddling in washington probably belong flooer the top and i spent an awful long time writing stories about that. >> rose: where do you worry abouin terms of the "times"? for example, some people ask about... there's increasing amount of opinion in the paper. do you worry about that? >> you know, i'm mindful of it and we have columns in the news pages. quite a few of them biz day, quite a few columnist in and, you know, i asked i sometimes read before those columns are published but we have drilled in the editors that there is a line between opinion and urging a specific action and deep analysis and i prefer to be on the si

reed is of a washington journal. caller: i agree with most of the figure just as much of it, except for the last point about things are not coming back. i think there is propaganda. i think collectively would we hear phrases like jobs are not coming back or we do not want to start a trade war, i agree with many colors of this issue, we have it at a trade war for a long time. i really sick of our politicians, pundits, or anybody standing up at the microphone back and saying if we cut back of the ratio of stop the trade deficit, but that will cost american jobs. i think it is the upper echelons of wall street. cul-de-sacs is the serial job exporter. they have been for 25 years. i am saying this to give an idea of just how corrupt our government is. guest: our calller is really tapped into the bigger out there. the reason the measures come down the pipe and that the of of an election year is politicians are aware how angry people are. people are looking for a reason. so what are due for a scapegoat. host: where are we i

they teach journalism.seems to be more interested in the coverage of himself at this point than really at anything he's investigating. >> 2000 need to fight more -- you two need to fight more next time. thank you very much. >>> with more and more personal information on facebook, blogger jeff jarvis takes a stand in favor of less privacy. for fastidious librarian emily skinner, each day was fueled by thorough preparation for events to come. well somewhere along the way, emily went right on living. but you see, with the help of her raymond james financial advisor, she had planned for every eventuality. ...which meant she continued to have the means to live on... ...even at the ripe old age of 187. life well planned. see what a raymond james advisor can do for you. i tell you what i can spend. i do my best to make it work. i'm back on the road safely. and i saved you money on brakes. that's personal pricing. >>> after facebook sparked an uproar over privacy by tweaking its rules, we look at it on line. jeff j

things like the wall street journal there's a both the wall street journal and al-jazeera english both set up their own wiki leaks style platforms to encourage leakers when the wall street journal said there was a they had some initial stumbling they chose the correct encryption algorithms that were vulnerable to certain forms of interception and on their terms of service basically said that they could. over your information to the government really whenever the government asks for it those organizations receive criticism legitimate criticism and they've sort of learned from that but really what this tells you is that news organizations at least right now are not really equipped to be setting up these sites they don't have trained information security experts and house right they focus on what they're good at which is digging up dirt and publishing it but they really really need to go out and acquire this additional expertise because their information their sources simply are not safe right now so in the meantime though you think that wiki leaks is probably the safest place for somebod