the media to create the propaganda, they kill innocent people, if we take that and look at what judith miller new york times did when they worked up lies about iraq, is that a terrorist act? then we look at the fact that we have never had a reason to invade iraq, yet we went into iraq to kill millions of people, and there were no wmd's. and what the lady said about vaccinations. you can refuse those vaccinations, because hhs has essentially has companies to manufacture vaccines. you can just say if this harms me, what can i do? guest: in terms of this commission, which will be at heritage at 11:00 a.m., they are moving beyond iraq. they are talking about wmd's. they believe there are real they believe there are real challenges out there.

have to how can you be informed and they say you mustbe kidding and say something sunrise like judith miller, and as you might remember chev is "the new york times" reporter who laid out the primrose path into war in iraq i say there's stuff there i need to know. and they say what? and my oldest son, brilliant writer himself, will say, if you spent that hour a day reading a novel you would be much mored of indicated. but frankly i'm of a generation of not giving it up. i have to have it in print and he says, no, it's all going to be gone in a year. so i read the times every morning. >> host: back to the nation. >> guest: i gave up the tribune and it was with great regreg -- regret but it's unreadable. i fine its unreadable and will be gone in the next year, which is a shame. >> host: back to the nation. i think most people consider it to be a liberal, progressive, whatever tag, magazine. why do you rail against and its where do politics follow? >> guest: i wouldn't say that i have politics opposed to in the nation. when i said i recalled against it i was being partly goofy. the fact is i thi

and they say, you must be kidding, and then they'll say something snide, judith miller. she, as you might remember, is "the new york times" reporter who laid out the prim roads path into war in iraq. and i say, yeah, but there's stuff there that i need to know. and they say what, and my oldest son will always say, you know, if you spent that hour a day reading a novel, you'd be much more educated than reading "the new york times." but frankly, i'm not giving it up, i've got to have it in print, and he says, no, it's all going to be gone in a year. oh, no, please. so i read the times every morning. >> host: i want to go back to the nation. >> guest: i gave up the tribune, incidentally, and it was with great regret, but it's unreadable. [laughter] it is. and i find it unreadable, and i think it'll be gone, also, in the next year which is a shame. >> host: back to the nation. i think most people would consider it to be a liberal progressive, whatever tag you want to put on it magazine. why do you rail against it, and where do your politics fall a as opposed to the nation? >

and then they'll say something snide like, let me just say one thing: judith miller. she, as you might remember, is "the new york times" reporter who laid out the prim rose path to war in iraq, and i say, yeah, but there's stuff there that i need to know. and they say, what? and my oldest son will always say, you know, if you spent that hour a day reading a novel, you'd be much more informed than reading "the new york times." he says it's all going to be gone in a year. no, no, please, so i read the times every -- >> host: i want to go back to the nation. >> guest: i gave up the tribune, and it was with great regret, but it's unread blg. [laughter] it is. i think it'll be gone in the next year, which is a shame. >> host: back to the nation. i think most people will consider it to be a liberal, progressive whatever tag you want to put on, why do you rail against it? >> guest: i didn't say i was, that i had politics as opposed to the nation. when i said i railed gepts it, i was partly being goofy. but the fact is that i think it's very important, and i know that we're s