he knew full well the same information pipeline supplying him was supplying judith miller.en goes on "meet the press" as if he just on his way to the studio happened to pick up "the new york times" and lo and behold, aluminum tubes are there. so now a story that comes from one tainted unreliable source has been independently confirmed by a respected news organization. the cravenness of that maneuver still sticks with me but dick cheney may have competition. it turns out senator lindsey graham pulled a cheney right under our noses having to do with lara logan. the big obsession is that the attack in benghazi wasn't pulled off by militia members or terrorists affiliated by al qaeda but rather by al qaeda itself. of course there was no evidence that was the case. ultimately a comprehensive "the new york times" story said it wasn't al qaeda, but when lara logan did her discredited "60 minutes" report a couple of months prior, this is what she said. >> contrary to the white house's public statements, which were still being made a full week later, it's now well established that t

he new full well the same information pipeline supplying him was supplying judith miller.on "meet the press" as if he just happened to pick up "the new york times" and, lo and be hold, aluminum tubes. now one story has been independently confirmed by a respected news organization. the cravenness of that maneuver sticks with me but dick cheney may have competition. lindsey graham pulled a cheney. the pig obsession of the hash tag benghazi conspiracy world is that the attack was not pulled up a with militia members or terrorists but rather by al qaeda itself. of course, there's no evidence that was the case. ultimately a comprehensive "new york times" story says it wasn't al qaeda. but when larry logan heard discredited "60 minutes" report, this is what she said. >> contrary to the white house's public statements, which were still being made a full week later, it's now well established that the americans were attacked by al qaeda, in a well-planned assault. >> you hear that? now well established. well, senator lin lindsey graham and ran straight to fox news with it. >> six "

certainly judith miller gets 24 very well.at what you leave out is as important sometimes as to what you include in a story or when you don't cover something. now they're in a point, you guys, where they can't even explain their own past. they can't admit what they have done, but i'm really, i think the special committee that the timing is, is good. it should have happened earlier and despite this now, the mainstream media will have to cover it because this now is many abouting a genuine, legitimate story. it is following a track i think very similar to watergate. jon: you know, and, i suppose you may have heard, judy, the discussion that bret baier was having with tommy vietor, the former white house spokesman. >> right. jon: bret was grilling him about the edits he made in the talking points he released. he said, dude, this is like two years ago. >> yeah, dude. ancient history, dude. i enjoy tommy vietor's tweets very much and i kind of miss him at the white house but that was astonishing performance. if you're going to go o

judith miller, a fox news contributor, and ed rollins, a veteran national campaign director.ou expecting nancy pelosi and company to be part of this select committee? >> as soon as she can figure out whether or not her democrats believe that it's going to be in the interest of the party to join or to boycott and try and portray the select committee as a total kangaroo court. that will be the strategy. if they boycott it will be risky. i think ultimately she will join but the democrats are divided. >> you think it's risky for the democrats if they don't join? >> very risky. you have no veto power or raise a ru kous. >> this is the story of the summer. so the people on this committee all of the sudden become stars. we don't know most of these women, they will be on fox news talking about this. very able people and i think that's going to be a big difference. >> and two women. exactly. because what's really at stake here is how badly this hurts hillary. the democrats must protect hillary. does it hurt hillary? >> it depends on what comes out. my sense is it's early. she's above

everything and lou dobbs.com the queue for being with us coming up tomorrow retired marine colonel, judith miller and moody's chief economist of merrill. please join us. good night from new york. ♪ ♪ neil: i have warned you a million times and promote it so many times. it sounds like a broken record. how often do we keep repeating the sins that we keep repeating? china, which we knew was moving in on us, "fast and furious", it's just a matter of mont away from being the premier economic power on the planet. it is an unusual measure and we're going to get into the details of it. but the so-called purchasing 30 index essentially says that at th

i like what judith miller is saying. i don't understand why we have to be the world's policemen. we cannot help them, sean hannity. >> lisa. i'll get to everybody. >> we have already committed to helping them. we have intelligence researchers on the ground. what we should really bring back u.s. exceptionalism. what does that mean? can you give chloe a copy of that? >> it doesn't mean i don't agree with it. >> this means an acknowledgment of what terrorism is and christian persecutionism. what's happening to the people of iran, the journalists that are being jailed in saudi arabia. this is an acknowledgment of all of it. >> you're in the media. it's interesting to me that all of a sudden jay leno and ellen degeneres jump on board. shar sharia, the oppression of women is now an issue. has the media been negligent in mentioning this? >> yes. this commitment of material and men to nigeria wouldn't have happened without a broad social media campaign. seven weeks before these women were kidnapped, boca haram slaughtered children and burned them alive. not a word was mentioned. it's inf

judith miller. both are fox news contributors. there seems to be plenty of blame to go around here.ministration has sort of been dodging it, but what about the media role in all of this? >> the media has been trying to polarize the issue this is been godsey, this is a real one. this is one the president cannot run away from matter how much some in the mainstream media pretend he can. when 2007 when walter reed was discovered to have serious problems, rachel maddow said it is an outrage, a crisis, unacceptable for a man who took us into war, but when the same things are happening under president obama, this is suddenly a problem in progress. >> is there selective attention being paid by the media? >> i think there is. there is a history of americans in the media when they take serious issues they want to investigate it because the veteran affairs crisis is a dynamic, exciting thing for those who want to know the news. when they are suddenly not interested in the details, you know there is a problem. there are other stories happening that perhaps this in and of itself a distraction li

i like what judith miller is saying. i don't understand why we are the world's policemen.ot the conservative approach. we cannot help them sean hannity. >> lisa, yeah? >> you know, we've already committed to helping them. we have intelligence researchers on the ground and, you know, what we should really bring back, bring back our girls and bring back u.s. exceptionalism. what does that mean. >> can you give chloe a copy of that? this means no apology. this means acknowledgement of what terrorism is. christian persecution. this means hashtags about the children being killed in syria. what is happening to the people of iran and journalist being jailed in saudi arabia. this is acknowledgement of all of it. >> i always hate to do this to you because i follow your work but you are in the media, and your website media covers a lot of media issues. it's interesting to me that all of a sudden now jay leno, ellen jump on board, now 15, 20 years later, sharia, the oppression of women has become an issue. has the media been neglect in calling attention to this? >> absolutely. it's b

a payment one new york times article by judith miller that had been fed to her by scooter libby was headlined. u.s. says hussein intensifies requests for a-bomb parts. the first sign of a smoking gun may be a mushroom cloud. then on "meet the press" edick cheney referenced a new york times story. the bush administration planted that very story. to make his point that saddam hussein was about to go nique leer. let's watch cheney in action. >> there's a story in "the new york times" this morning. and i want to attribute the "times" i don't want to talk obviously about specific intelligence sources, but it's now public that, in fact, he has been seeking to acquire and we have been able to intercept him and prevent him from acquiring through this particular channel the kinds of tubes that are necessary to build a centrifuge. we do know with absolute certainty that he is using his procurementment system to acquire what he need to enrich uranium. >> people who care about this country watch "meet the press" to find out what's happening. ewe dimiller delivered scooter libby's stuff so that this guy o

i like what judith miller is saying i don't understand why we have to be the world's policemen. that's not the conservative approach. we cannot help him, sean hannity. >> lisa? >> you know, we have already committed to helping them. we have intelligence researchers on the ground. we should bring back our girls. we should also bring back u.s. exceptionalism. >> can you give her a copy of that. >> doesn't mean i don't agree. >> this means an acknowledgment of what terrorism is. this means hash tags about the children being killed in syria. what is happening to the journalists in iran, this means an acknowledgment of all of it. >> i hate to do this to you because i follow your work but you are in the media, and your web site covers a lot of media issues. it is interesting to me now they jump on board now 15, 20-years later sharia the oppression of women has become annish oo you. has the media become negligent? >> it is better late than never but it is absolutely late. we understand social media campaigns are pretty much directing foreign policy. essentially this commitment of mater

judith miller, pulitzer prize-winning investigative author and reporter. fox news contributor.ce is radio show host and fox news contributor and welcome to both of you. why so little interest, judy on parts of big three networks? >> i scratch my head, jon, asking myself this question. this is surely a story. whether or not you think it is, whether or not you disagree with what the republicans have done, whether or not you think democrats or should not participate in this exercise, it is a story and the fact that the mainstream media continues to take a, what difference does it make attitude towards benghazi tells us a lot about their prejudices and about their biases. and i think it is just a shocking dereliction of duty. jon: yeah, tammy, even abc, which you know, managed not to, not to cover this thing, did manage to find room for a two-minute feature about jason patric and his custody battle with his, you know, former girlfriend or wife or something over his child. >> yeah. it is pretty outrageous. and judith's words are perfect, it is a derelicts of duty. what the liberals

one reporter, judith miller, was jailed for 85 days in 2005 for refusing to disclose her source in the government probe. at this point under current law journalists are in a quandary. they realize the need to protect their sources. that right is recognized in 49 states. but it's not codified at the federal level. what i seek to do at this late hour today is to do just that. i think this is a very important principle as franzford pointed out -- as bransford pointed out that springs from our law. the constitution and first amendment provides for freedom of speech and of the press. it is incongruent to say we have freedom of the press but the federal government can subpoena your sources and put them and you in prison, you if you don't comply. this is something that should have been handled perhaps years, not decades ago. it falls upon us tonight at this late hour to try to handle it ourselves. i respectfully submit this amendment as being a much-needed and long-delayed clarification that the federal government treats this matter no differently than 49 states now do and therefore i ask for

. >> host: martin miller, professor at duke, the foundations of modern terrorism is the book. >> judith kelley talks about election observers. part of booktv's college series and is 20 minutes. >> host: duke professor judith kelley, the author of monitoring democracy: when international election observation works and why it often fails." professor kelley, when did international election monitoring come into vogue? >> guest: it really started taking off in the late '80s, beginning '90s. there had been election monitoring under u.n. regimes in different ways with decolonization but this is a new flavor of it where it really was outsiders going in to sovereign states, monitoring their elections, and the way it came into vogue, the way it rose, is very important for understanding how it works today. so, initially we had a lot of governments towards the end of the cold war that had not been democratic and now wanted to show off their intentions to behave more democratically, and so they had an incentive to invite monitors in, even though this is sort of a sacred thing. it's the heart of demo