. >> judith reagan lost her job at fox news. she's now back with the interview. of people, they don't remember that nuance or weren't around for o.j. the first time around. what do you want them to know about the idea that he might have been with somebody else? >> it's totally preposterous. there was so much hoopla around this case, people forget the actual evidence. the evidence at the crime scene showed without a doubt there was only one perpetrator. size 11 shoes, bruno motley shoes, walking away from the scene, blood trail to the left. o.j. had a cut on his left hand, blood on the gate, blood in the bronco, blood at his home in rocking ham, in brentwood. no evidence of any other person there at all. this fictional charlie was new in this interview in 2006. the internet conspiracy theory has always been jason, his son from his previous marriage was somehow involved. jason was not in the area, completely untrue. o.j. simpson committed this crime by himself. >> i remember at the time psychologists were saying that charlie was a proxy, was a way for him to help h