julia trigg, tell us what your argument is going to be in your motion. >> karen, the opportunity to filehearing it your last shot. and we will try to make more clear the issues we think are at the table. we may, me and my attorney, have done our research because two years ago this court acknowledged that property rights are precious and checking a box shouldn't give one the power. we're hoping to reinfuse that kind of mindset with this last document that's due on the 4th. >> and paula, what can julia trigg say to refine that argument that's going to be more potent than previous arguments? >> i think to put a fine point on it, essentially what needs to be truly emphasized is the takings power belongs to the government and if the government determines it's going to delegate that enormous responsibility, it's got to take good care to make sure its designee is indeed a fiduciary of the public trust. it seems suspect that a designee like transcanada, a foreign, private corporation could somehow become vested with the quasi governmental function simply by checking off a box on a one-page fortu