julie did a pretty interesting story, can't wake for the lockup period when shares go outstanding to start shorting things and borrow the shares and actually short it. this is something i think, when you goldmanke this, yes it is a great firm. it is also a firm been known to play these games in the past. investors have to worry. they have to look at this rating as one of the more conflicted ratings in the business, meaning they got paid $26 million in ipo fees and they got the most money and now when twitter needs it the most, there has been selling pressure, they came out with a hail mary pass and it actually did work a little bit. the shares went up i think something like 4%. they settled back down. i tell you, investor out there, be wary, this is among the most conflicted stock ratings. shows, sec rules promulgated in 2003 by the securities & exchange commission and eliot spitzer when he was a new york attorney general, they were supposed to erect all the barriers they are not working if you can get away with this. lori: look at the fundamentals of this stock. goldman sachs pays analysts hefty bucks, right to actually make educated calls on the behalf of stock prices. i'm defending goldman