. >> julie roberts did this. you're like the julie roberts of the oscar nominee luncheon. >> that's how i think of myself, yes. >> on the way, inside jen and justin's millionty million dollar mansion, and our oprah exclusive. >> behind the scenes with reese. >> i'm in paris. there's dakota johnson right there. >> and the side of jamie dornan you haven't seen. >> and we are revealing secret you haven't seen. >> and we are revealing secret fitnesses to whatever you're doing to stay healthy... there's something you may be missing. you haven't seen. >> and we are revealing secret fitnesses to a key part of your wellness that you may be... overlooking. it's your eyes. that's why there's ocuvite, from bausch + lomb. as you age your eyes can lose vital nutrients. ocuvite helps replenish those nutrients. ocuvite has lutein, zeaxanthin, and omega-3. nourish your eyes to help them be their healthy best. ocuvite eye vitamins. be good to your eyes. touch is how we communicate with those we love, but when your psoriasis is ba

. >> my name is julie roberts and i would press appreciation for the african american families at our school across the district who have been encouraging our schools to teach african american history month this month. they will survey schools to understand the baseline. my children are asian and white. it's important they understand and learn black history. black history is american history. when we fail to teach black and other histories that is a key building block. i appreciate the work that families are doing. it also has started important conversations at our schools where it's open to conversations about race and what histories we are teaching. one of the things that we realised is there's an interest in making sure that we're teaching all of the history of the diverse students in our schools. the reality is we have a policy of inclusive and ethnic studies within our district. but we haven't actually, in my opinion, resourced it and created the structure to make sure that that's actually happening in classrooms. so in the same way we provide professional development and plannin

his fellow agent robert rojas was killed in action in july 2009. according to the ongoing investigation, the five suspects detained in connection with his murder are thought to be either drug or human traffickers or both. >> latest edition to the arsenal is this, some 630 miles have been built. >> the has this fence changed anything? >> this fence has made a big difference. >> it has denied the drug organization traffickers to roam free. >> they and other local and state agencies are up against ingenius smugglers. they have hidden cocaine in frozen sharks and build submersibles and even sent ultra light aircraft soaring into america. on the ground entrenched on the border, a network of narco criminals called gate keeper. >> a gatekeeper is the key to the drug trafficking criminal tivt along the southwest border. >> arthur doty is director of the el paso center. >> they have family on both sides and businesses on both sides. the border to them is a minor challenge. >> oliver: so these are contractors? >> very much so. >> oliver: for whom? >> a highe

julie. >> jon: sort of a clearance sale you might say. overstock. >> if you have an old aircraft hanging around. >> jon: john roberts. ank you. >> julie: thank you, john. to the mid-terms and new concerns for democrats with one headline reading demolition derby. glut of candidates has party at war with itself. the california democratic party refused to endorse dianne feinstein. there is no secret here, mark, that there definitely needs to be new, fresh blood for the democratic party. feinstein is a perfect example of what is wrong with the democratic party, would you not say? >> it also says something to where the democratic party is going when senator feinstein is considered not liberal enough for them and they are just lurching to the left to the extreme and it shows that 2018 will come down to a simple message. results versus resistance. republicans under the leadership of president trump have the results. so far the only thing the democratic party has offered is resistance. >> julie: first of all, robin. in california democrats want to hijack the democratic party and actually lean so far left, will they not be doi

julie hyman. staying with our top story, u.s. special counsel robertling the details of a widespread and corrugated campaign by russians to influence the u.s. presidential election in favor of donald trump. we are now joined by marty shanker, our chief content officer. shere were 13 russian named in the indictment, and as of now there is no talk of collusion in this indictment? fact, the indictment specifically says any unnamed americans involved in this activity were unwitting participants. there is absolutely no evidence in this indictment of a direct link to, for instance, anyone in the trump campaign. scarlet: so this would be a victory lap for the white house if it were to go by what happens today? marty: i think it would be wise for the white house to not completely feel they have been vindicated here. air is always the possibility that mueller could, sometime in the future, do a superseding indictment, name additional defendants. he is obviously lining up many cooperating witnesses. there is indications that there are more to calm, so i do not t

>> julie: new information on special counsel robert mueller's investigation into possible russian collusion with the trump campaign. former white house strategist steve bannon meeting with mueller's team for more than 20 hours this week and appearing before a congressional panel but lawmakers found him uncooperative. some saying he should be held in contempt for refusing to answer questions. >> jon: a series of chilling social media posts showing the arsenal of weapons by the confessed shooter in the parkland, florida massacre. some outlets calling out the president for gun control. president trump stresses the need to address america's mental health issues. >> my hope is that his ego is bigger than his cowardice. he has a chance, frankly, to be brave with no down side. by the way. we would say okay, a couple of bots jumped in there. this is our children. >> there have already been eight school shootings this year. we're at february 15th. the monday after valentine's day about a month into the year and there have been eight already this year. there were 48 last year. what can you do, you as

robert: the president also endorlsed the n.r.a.'s position that there could be more guns in school. julie wrote today on the frontagof "the new york times" about the president calling for training and army of teachersnd paying them a bonus foraring a weapon. how much of this is talk and how much of it could actually lead to action on capitol hill? >> it's really going to be up to thehe presidenter he's willing to really lead on this issue, whether he can get it past the points of what he called today all talk and no substantive moving ahead. he hasdu intd this idea, which he seems very enmored of, of training certain teachers who are trained to use firearms to protect they were -- eir students to turn schools into basically fortress protected by educators who are trained to do that. it's a very controversial idea, not just with democrats but with a lot o republicans who support gun rights and want to see safer schools b think this is a problematic issue. one of the big questions is going to be will the president insist that ncealed carry permits f teamers be a part of the solution. there

. >>> robert mueller files news charge against robert manafort and rick gates. juliew. how big of of a deal are these new charges against these two men? >> so yes, this was a big development. rm, there were already charges against robert mueller and his deputy, rick gates. so this came as a surprise that mueller would be going back and adding even more charges against them. this stems from money laundering where $75 million were funneled through off-shore accounts and brought into the united states through real estate dealings. robert gates helped his boss, paul manafort, hide a lot of that money and now it's clear that robert mueller is trying to come back and get more because of those charges. this puts us in an interesting place in the timeline of the investigation. we sort of thought robert mueller was working from the outside in from people inside the trump campaign and he would flip them and once he had already gotten them on an indictment or gotten them to cooperate, he would be moving forward to the next fish. well, now he's circling back. so what this says to

july, 2016. papadopoulos who is now cooperating with robert mueller's team was reported to have told an australian diplomat of all people over drinks in a pub or wine bar that are russia had political dirt on hillary clinton. we will talk about that specific revelation or at least confirmation of the reporting which has profound implications. we'll talk about that in just a bit. but proponents of the memo are using it to advance a different narrative using a patchwork of incomplete information which the fbi led by a republican hand picked by the president said contains "material omissions of fact." the memo's backers want to portray russia as the russia probe as an anti-trump conspiracy hop rating at the highest levels of the justice department. that supposesly began under president obama and crucially and implausibly has been advanced by donald trump's own political appointees. okay? that's what they want you to believe. they want you to believe at the completely invalidates robert mueller's entire investigation. the president having already tried and failed to fire mueller himself according to "

former spokesman for president trump's personal legal team, who resigned in july, is ready to talk to special counsel robertueller about a key conference call he was on with white house communications director hope hicks and the president. the "times" reporting that in that call, miss hicks said donald trump jr.'s potentially incriminating e-mails about being ready to receive dirt on hillary clinton said in a quote, it will never get out. in a statement, miss hicks strongly denies that she said that. joining me now is the "new york times" washington investigations editor, part of the reporting team that broke that story. mark, bring us up to date. tell us what is important about this new report in the "new york times." >> well, what's important, we believe, is that you had a senior member of the president's legal team who has since left the team who is going or prepared to tell robert mueller, the special counsel, about this encounter, about this whole 48-hour period when the white house was putting together this statement about the trump tower meeting a year earlier. he is saying what he believes or he int

robert: as molly isaying, the mueller team is turning its attention to a meeting that took place on o air force last july and that meeting, the white house aidesescribed a trump tower meeting, donald trumpni had and focused on p russian adoptiicy. mueller wanted to know how this came together. hopeix is under scrutiny for her role. and in another piece of news, the attorneys for rick gates, an associate and paul manafort have asked to withdraw. all these moving parts in the ruia probe a as molly is sake. hope hicks under scrutiny. >> i can barel keep up. look, i think some republicans are realizing they may have overstepped this week. paul ryan specifically called for the democratic rebuttal o this memo to be released and be released as sosn asble. yesterday at a press conference, he tried to say over and over again, this is what ts government is, congressional oversight of the f.b.i. and not allege of the f.b.i. and d.o.j. are corrupt and not anythigainst mueller, but he has lost control of that narrative. and -- robert: can you critique the leadership of law enforcement institutions and say youre not c

robert forest, has abruptly retired. now, barry received a lot of national attention and support last july after an announcement that her son had died after a drug overdose. >>> first lady michelle obama is finally revealing what was in the tiffany box. >> during an appearance on the ellen show, she explained what happened when mrs. trump unexpectedly handed her a tiffany's box on inauguration day. >> there was a gift exchange, there was a box given. >> the tiffany box. >> so what was in there? >> it was a lovely frame. >> a frame? >> it was a frame. there's all this protocol. this is like a state visit. they tell you they're going to stand here. never before do you get this gift. so i'm like, okay, what am i supposed to do with this gift? and everyone cleared out. >> because the gift was not part of that choreographed meeting, nobody was assigned to take it off mrs. obama's hands. >> i love how she's looking to turn around. >> guess who stepped in and took charge? hers, the president himself, barack obama who was still technically the president at the time. he took the box and brought it inside the white house. problem

president said in july telling the "new york times," probing into his finances or his family's would cross a red line. is that reviving the idea that perhaps the president migtd fire robert? >> we haven't seen tweets or reaction from the white house this morning to suggest that is something that is being considered. we -- former independent counsel ken starr told cnn earlier today he thought it went beyond the mandate. the special counsel is thorsed to look at anyone that may have arisen from the investigation. one of the sources we spoke to for this piece told us there were allegations that these things were out there and that the special counsel may have been checking the boxes to make sure to rundown all of these leads. >> appreciate it. thank you. i want to dive deeper with seth waxman, former federal prosecutor and cnn political reporter rebecca berg and david chalian also with us. take a listen. >> i think it's beyond his mandate. the mandate is what happened during the 2016 election in terms of collusion? that's the key idea. >> seth, do you agree with that? is it in fact beyond the mandate? >> with all due respective to disagree with mr. starr on this one. i agre

robert cost a, he has called you. there's a famous sbrinterview. julie did my favorite sbrir ein ever with the president, in the transcript says, hey, you got a diet coke? >> i'm okay, mr. president. >> i want to draw all of you out on -- don't give away any trade craft to ame, certainly not on tv, but there's a strategy for getting dronald trump to open u, mike b l chael schmidt. you got donald trump to say unbelievable things that he sees the justice department's real purpose in his mind to is to protect him. he's disappointed his doj doesn't function as he thinks that eric holder functioned for barack obama. as a protector of his. what do you think he wants to be protected from? >> well, that's really sort of the million-dollar question of the entire trump story and the mueller story is does the president -- is he saying this stuff because he has something to hide or does he simply just not like the idea of this investigation and thinks he can push it away? is this someone that expects loyalty from everyone around him or is it he needs loyalty in this

roberts at the white house. john, what is this? >> this all dates back 0 july 8 when the president was winging his way back from germany and the g-20. that's when the news with the rush attorney and donald trump junior, paul manafort and a couple other folks there at trump tower came out. mark corrallo was the president for the outside counsel, mark kasowitz. he is prepared to tell the special counsel that hope hicks said that the e-mails from donald trump jr. about that meeting with the russian lawyer will never come out, never be made public. hope hicks through her attorney is denying anything that corrallo has to say that may not reflect well on her. as most reporters know, it's not my practice to respond to questions from the media. this is trout speaking, this warrants a response that she never said that. that the e-mails would never come out and the idea that hope hicks ever suggested that e-mails or other documents would be concealed or destroyed is completely false. the reason this is important, shep, is because if you're building a case of obstruction

on july sixteenth nine hundred forty five on the testing grounds in new mexico they detonated the world's first atomic bomb trinity. the doomsday weapon worked. physicist robert oppenheimer passed it over to the military in the person of general leslie groves the true director of the project the us government and military could now decide how and whether to use the atomic weapons two bombs were sent to the base at ten yet. despite protest from many scientists the military refused to consider detonating one outside populated areas as a demonstration of force to have its full effect us leadership decided the bomb had to destroy and kill. at the allies potsdam conference held around the same time president truman knew he had the ultimate weapon. the atomic bomb had strengthened truman's hand both with his former allies and with the japanese. he issued an ultimatum calling for the emperor to advocate his throne and japan to capitulate. the japanese rejected those terms. won over six nine hundred forty five but eight hours sixteen minutes and two seconds a single b. twenty nine dropped an atomic bomb on hiroshima. the copilot robert lowe is sad my god what have we

that led peter strzok to be removed as the lead agent for robert mueller's investigation in july. and so now johnson has that batch and a later batch that was turned over in january of 384 pages of texts. so he has all those. there's another batch that they have rediscovered that was missing. that won't come until later. >> you say you have a latest batch of 384. the batch, does it come with any context? or is it just a dump? >> it's you know there are text messages that have been weeded out by the justice department and redacted. that deal with work-related matters, we're not getting kind of the more intimate messages. it's really interesting when they go back and forth they're arguing about a story in "the wall street journal" and it's pretty clear there's a subtext to the argument, that it's not just about the article itself. it's about something deeper, an interpersonal issue. so you've got to get all of the insight, the guys as they've led these two big investigations. >> del clinton wilbur, thank you very much. >>> heidi, the president of the united states and the entire rep

july. which contradicts white house statements that the porter investigation was, quote, ongoing. >> a lot to go over this morning. john roberts is live at the white house with the very latest. good morning, john. >> good morning. the white house still responding a week later to this story about what was known by whom and when about rob porter and why the timeline keeps shifting. no decision has been made yet suggestions were being kicked around last night that perhaps it would be a good idea to have john kelly and the white house counsel don mcgahn come out and brief the press. there is a possibility. 1:00 this afternoon when we have that briefing the kelly and mcgahn could come out. this has all been kicked up a notch with the announcement that trey gowdy has opened an investigation into porter's tenure here. he sent a letter to john kelly asking for information about the circumstances surrounding porter's employment and the policy and practices that the white house uses for personnel with security clearance. gowdy is also looking for a timeline. listen here. >> i would want to know from don mcgahn and general kelly and anyo

julie: finally, i would like to ask you given the news in the united states today with robert muellerse indictments alleging all of this russian meddling in the u.s. electoral process, what is going on in mexico? is this a topic of discussion? is being investigated as well? nacha: really good question. was here-- tillerson talking about the possibility of russian meddling. there have been some lawmakers in the u.s. that have talked about that possibility or raised that concern, but in mexico, the mood on the ground is they really don't have proof. they are not really concerned about it. the way that people are worried about the meddling specifically would be to give a lift to salvador, and he actually scoffed at it, made fun of it, and left it off and the people do not seem to mind. scarlet: sounds familiar. thank you so much. appreciate it. next, how do you transition from professional sports to professional investing? we talked to baron davis, former athlete and karen venture capitalist. from new york, this is number. ♪ -- from new york, this is bloomberg. ♪ scarlet: the nba all-sta

his two prior wives, came in in march and july, how is it that the chief of staff didn't know about it until february? >> dana: at the top of the show, john roberts reported that it's possible that today at the white house briefing that's now scheduled for 3:00, that general kelly, chief of staff, and the white house counsel general counsel could come to the podium to brief reporters, which would be remarkable because we haven't seen that before. it might help clarify a lot. what do you think? >> reminds me of back when they had rice previs an steve bannon appear together for just love and the squeezing of the knee and the hugging -- >> dana: i don't think this will be like that today. this is a very different thing. that was about internal division. this is about competency at the white house, judgment and character. those things are all in question right now. over the last three days, we've seen tweets like this fromhaber "the new york times" saying several white house officials are now prefacing or concluding their making clear they can't swear by the information they've just given. now, i couldn't operate like that in a white house. >> i do t

july 2016 interview. and it was strzok who changed fbi director comey's conclusion from grossly negligent to extremely careless. whether the trump campaign played any role, strzok then joined special counsel robertueller's team as a key investigator. strzok finally was demoted after his anti-trump texts were revealed, banished to a human resources position. joining us, gregg jarrett. i not it was important to put together how important strzok is. he's not a small cog in a big wheel. to juxtapose the president's statement about never interfering in any way, shape or form, positive, end of sentence, then seeing that memo between strzok and page is disconcerting. gregg: first of all, president obama is wrong when he suggests there should never be a president involved in investigations at the fbi and department of justice. that is one of the great myths person pet waited over the last 40 years since water d mirths perpetuated over the last 40 years since watergate. now he has a conflict of interest if it involves him or one of the people directly under him. president trump doesn't seem to understand the law. david: these two people strzok and page, we know clearly hundreds of thousands of texts that

julie for julia chatterley. welcome to bloomberg markets. ♪ we are live in bloomberg world headquarters in new york over the next hour. move.r's u.s. special counsel robertpread and coordinated campaign by russians to influence the u.s. presidential election in favor of donald trump. that is our leading story right now. let's get more on the breaking story. mueller has announced a guilty plea for a california man, that is the latest development. we want to bring in kevin cirilli, our chief washington correspondent from our washington bureau. tell us a little bit more about the washington men who pleaded guilty? kevin: this was announced in juxtaposition with the indictment that came out against the 13 individuals from russia as well as the three businesses. we do not know, for example, which

. >> independent counsel robert fiske has been masterful in his role has congressional traffic cop. he has comnded congrsmen to go and when to stop. >> in late july the house and senate opened their own hearings on whitewater. a few daysater, fiske flew to florida to visit his mother-in-law, who was ill. >> i got off the plane, and i was carrying a beeper in those days. and it said something like, "call your washington office." so i called, and mark stein said, "you won't believe this, but you've been replaced by ken starr." that's how i found out. >> so, that's how i began -- with a phone call in the early summer of 1994. liberty mutual stood with me when this guy got a flat tire in the middle of the night, so he got home safe. yeah, my dad says our insurance doesn't have that. what?! you can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. my doctor recommended i switch to miralax.on, stimulant laxatives make your body go by forcefully stimulating the nerves in your colon. miralax is different. it works with the water in your body to hydrate and soften. unblocking your system naturally. miralax. you've probably seen m

july of 2016. papadopoulos, another trump campaign foreign policy adviser pleaded guilty to lying about contacts with russians and is now cooperating with special counsel robert mueller. so the fbi was all in on possible trump campaign/russia connections months before asking for a warrant on carter page. so if the memo was designed to discredit the genesis of the russia investigation, that notion itself discredited by the memo itself. and even setting that aside, it's being criticized for more than just internal inconsistency. the fbi, run by the president's handpicked director, a republican, says the document is marred by, quote, omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo's accuracy. a leading and highly respected member of the president's own party goes beyond even that. the statement from john mccain is frankly scathing. the latest attacks against the fbi and department of justice serve no american interests, no parties, no presidents, only putin's. he goes on, the american people deserve to know all the facts surrounding russia's ongoing efforts to subvert our democracy, which is why special counsel mueller's investigation must proceed unimpeded

julie: thank you. >> jon: a fox news alert and that controversial memo from house republicans about abuses of the fisa law is in the pipeline we understand. john roberts white house correspondent tells us it is being transmitted from the white house back to the house select committee on intelligence with no redactions. the way this works the house of representatives, the committee i should say put this thing together, sent it to the president for his review to see whether there were any classified bits of information in there that should be removed or redacted. president trump decided on no redactions. he sends the committee back the memo essentially with his blessing and the committee then decides to release it. so we understand that the memo is in the pipeline being sent from the white house back to the committee. what form they are doing so we do not know at this point. it should be momentarily, i would think, that memo, that controversial memo ultimately does see he the light of day. we'll certainly bring it to you the moment it does. in the meantime president trump is firing back at the mainstream media after mixed reviews for his state of the un

reporting robert mueller's team is looking into president trump's personal business dealings with russia before his presidential campaign. you'll recall during an interview with the "new york times" in julyresident was asked whether mueller looking into his finances would be unrelated to russia. and whether that would cross the red line. here is what the president said, quote: i would say yeah. i would say yes. i think that's a violation, end quote. later in that interview, the president was asked whether that would be a fireable offense. the president responding, quote: i can't answer that question because i don't know -- i don't think it's to happen end quote. back with power panel now. legsly marshall and alex conkoenig. we are at that point. >> yeah, it sounds like it. look, mueller has a broad mandate but it does not include phishing. >> harris: have you told him that? >> the people at the justice department did when they gave him the assignment. there is nothing wrong with asking questions. if that's all is he doing asking questions to fill in the fuller picture, i suppose there is nothing wrong with that. >> harris: what crosses the line. >> if he indicts the president or the pres

robert e. lee, praises the confederacy. i don't know why at this point we're surprised he stood by this guy. he's been chief of staff since last july. if the fbi informed the white house that this guy couldn't get a security clearance, the chief of staff would know that. >> senator, are you -- i feel like i lose my capacity to be shocked. i have to say i genuinely i'm shocked that this individual was given the job he was in that white house and then defended after it became public after they knew what he is alleged to have done. >> well, we have to remember that kelly had to know all about this. and the people very close to donald trump at the very high level knew about this. i've been visited by the fbi. they asked my opinion about certain judges that were proposed for the bench because they came from california bip knew them. they turn over every rock. i would -- i know this in my heart if not i didn't read about it, but i know in my heart that the fbi must have seen that photo. must have seen the complaint that was written to the court. they knew what they were seeing. so it is shocking that this individual would pass and would

julie pace. jorge ramos. the author of the book "stranger." congratulations. and lon he chen. the former policy director for the romney/ryan campaign. and our own cokie roberts about the gun debate. i started by saying is it different this time? i was struck by dana loesch. suggesting that president trump may not know where he's going to end up on this debate. she's probably right. >> that's the thing that is different. we have had outrage. victims very impactful. now we have these students. clearly a lot of momentum there. we have had that before. what we haven't had is a president that nobody has any idea what they're going to do. and i will tell you, george, that the president has been telling his people, his staff, that he's serious about raising the age for rifle purchases to 21. he's talking about universal background checks. those are two things the nra is dead set against. will he actually stick to that going forward? i think will are reasons to doubt that. he's hinted in the past he would do something and hasn't. right now he's talking about things that the nra is dead set against. >> the fact that he's not reliable on it means that republicans in c

in july of 2017 the fbi allowed lawmakers see the memo about comey's version of conversations that he had with president trump later leaked to the professor that leaked to the fbi that led to robert mueller. the fbi made sure the information in these memos was severely restricted. why would that be? comey testified under oath that he gave the memos to that friend, they leaked to the "new york times," in the hopes that robert mueller would be appointed as special counsel. it happened. you would think if those memos were so damning and damaging and explosive and proved obstruction of justice which we hear about, like comey and the media and the democrats claim, why don't we release the memos. they are keeping them secret for a reason. look at congressman trey gowdy, south carolina, skriebld the memos in december. described the memos. >> obstruction of jules advertise was discussed when combo had comey had the memos. they would be defense exhibit a in obstruction of justice case. not prosecution exhibit. defense exhibit a. if comey felt obstructed, he did a masterful job of keeping it out of any of his memos. >> sean: defense exhibit a. the entire so-called scandal with the memo kre

robert mueller's investigation, was the real catalyst for the probe. this sentence is buried in the last paragraph of the memo. quote, the papadopoulos information triggered an opening in late july 2016 by fbi agent pete strzok, who was removed by mueller from his team after discovering anti-trump texts he exchanged with his mistress, a lawyer for the fbi. that doesn't negate the fact that the bureau's investigation began long before that fisa warrant. the president is spending the weekend at his private club in mar-a-lago. jeff bennett is there. let me get a sense from you of how the white house is reacting. >> reporter: the president is proclaiming his innocence this morning, pointing to the partisan memo that he declassified as proof. the president writing this on twitter. the memo totally -- david, we just lost the tweet. if you could read it for me. >> the memo totally vindicates trump, in quotation marks, in probe. but the russian witch hunt goes on and on. there was no collusion and there was -- the wor used now because after one year of looking endlessly and finding nothing, collusion is dead. this is an american disgrace. that is the tweet that the president fired off t

july 2016. now the campaign by trump allies to push for the memo's release -- >> #releasethememo. call the number on your screen. tell congress. >> has turned to robert mueller. >> the special counsel must be disbanded immediately. and by the way, nobody else will say this, all charges against paul manafort and general michael flynn need to be dropped. it's that simple. >> and house intelligence committee chair devin nunes says there's more to come. >> we are in the middle of what i call phase two of our investigation, which involves other departments, specifically the state department and some of the involvement that they had in this. >> joining me now for his first interview since leaving the white house last summer is president trump's first chief of staff, reince priebus. welcome back to "meet the press." >> good morning, chuck. it's a pleasure to be back. >> all right. let me start right on an issue that happened near the end of your tenure as white house chief of staff. "the washington post" reported last month the following. trump's ire at mueller rose to such a level that steve bannon and reince priebus grew incredibly concerned that he was g