>> if not, we will proceed to our first item, which is in fact, the juliet ellis and >> and you have the settlement gret before you and the stipulation document and a couple of notes about this, this is a joint settlement and so there were three negotiating parties and the respondent and the two enforcement agency and because the fppc has heard and accepted the settlement agreement in a public session, we are in an unusual situation, because our regulations require that this is things be debated in closed session and however since it has been debated publicly, the city attorney has advised us to do the same. and so the staff and the city attorney will represent any questions that you have about the document

meeting in regards to one of the matters that we did the last time, the matter having to do with juliet ellis. i have informed that the puc, gave miss ellis something like a five-day suspension. and we have accepted a stipulation in which she admitted to some fairly important and agregious corrupt conduct in my opinion, influencing a government decision in which the official has a financial interest, so my motion for next time for discussion is going to be that we recommend to the puc, in light of her admissions, contained in the stipulation, that she did indeed commit these violations of influencing a government decision in which the official has a financial interest, that we recommend to the puc that she be terminated. >> is that something that we need to vote on? >> you can't, this is a discussion item only, that is for the in-coming chair to take under advisement when he and i plan the next month's agenda. >> thanks. >> dually noted commissioner keane. >> anyone else? >> and any public comment on matters appearing before the commission, or not appearing on the agenda? >> actually, you hav

and if you go a little deeper, then the new direct for green for all that replaced juliet ellis and his wife, now works for her. how did that happen? >> so, if you commissioners superficially assume that your staff did a wonderful job, i think you don't know the difference between the reality and the fluff. that is too much fluff. this woman today is arrogant, tomorrow, she is going to have opened up a new section of the south east commission in the bay view. she is going to be introducing the board of supervisors cohen and doing the introduction. she has been saying openly, that they can do anything about this. and as i told you earlier in my comments, she is looking forward to her pension and her benefits. and this is, is this the type of public official, she by the way is assistant general manager of the sfpuc. and she by the way was a commissioner, is there a precedence before that some of the commissioner to such a position to relief the fpuc and i can go on and on with her job. and now, there are some people who think that if they are visit the white house or they speak to obama,