right i mean that the taxes in west out the way it was supposed to we know just briefly junius it was introduced to boost tax revenue discover meant in uganda have any alternatives to that are you the government seems to have a few in the falklands the tax goody has suggested that there is a need to started a social media talks itself is need to a very small research in order to get these people to predict tactics regarding the social media should be able to protect so many could advise me but also important to note that this is immediate fact was a challenge should you start this sent home another controversial plan on mobile money to abortions were used abused many young men you got as you knows how bank accounts but how mobile phone accounts so the government others wanted to have. then to protect you those generals with the end of the girlfriend will have to leave it here but thank you so much for your time today as mugabo in kampala. more than half of afghans live on less than $1.00 and $1.00 reason for them or one way of them for them to get out of poverty is that many families

i'm jim reuben, reuben, junius, and rose. you received a letter the other day from john elberling. he's here, and you can talk to him, as well. we ask for july 25 because we think 30 days is enough to get our issues resolved, on our way to get being our issues resolved -- getting our issues resolved, or can't. reuben, junius, and rose removed 300 masonic from your calendar that day, so there should be a spot to fill, so we stipulate to that continuance. thank you. >> thank you. a any one else wish to comment on item 13 a and b? >> our client is not available for the august 29 date, and we would request july 25, as well. >> okay. thank you. thank you. anyone else from the public? >> good afternoon. daniel bornstein. i'm the attorney for the project participant. we're asking for a continuance while we continue to dialogue with the tenant who has requested discretionary review, see that if we can negotiate a further potential resolution. >> clerk: which item? >> commissioner hillis: item 17. >> okay. thank you. >> so i move to continue items 4, 5 -- >> that's the consent calendar. >>

junius, can i ask you a question? i was a confused at the arc. who is the client? who are you representing? >> sure. my client is the company that now owns one of the units and are an owner and the company that built the building. they purchased the entire project which is frankly, part of the confusion where we got off on the wrong foot at one point. my client is --. >> i think that is the distinction. they are not the same people that entitled it. >> correct. >> that is where i was confused. >> correct. >> anyway, i will take just a few minutes here. i don't think there is a whole lot to talk about. we certainly are in agreement with virtually every recommendation from the arc and the conditions that were just described by shannon. i want to thank shannon on the help for this one and a lot of detail and lot of history and appreciate your patience. just pretty obvious that the existing owners like the building the way it is, and some letters submitted at the last second saying we are fine with the architecture. my clients and i know that is not the issue, but the