jupiter, passes very close to the star. they are called hot jupiters because they are big and hot. not because they are hot inside, because they are close to the star, but they are hot, but they are heated by the star. it's hot there, it's hot there, like mercury is only hefty. planet i would say much closer to mercury mercury is far enough away. hot peters often rotate at a distance of literally several stellar radii and make one revolution, some earth days. yes , it happens that in a few hours yes, it happens that the planet makes a revolution, that is, in fact , its year is less than one earth day. no, but these two methods. yes, do they complement each other or what? yes, they complement each other perfectly, if both methods can be applied to the same planet, then we can measure both mass and radius and orbital period eccentricities. and, accordingly, calculate the average density of the planet. this means that it is very important to determine its chemical composition , you said that there is no method, since we do not see the planet, but we see indirect data. we don't know everything. we don't know the inclination of the orbit. e in advance e we er, well, this is, firstly and er, each method has its own limitations and determines only some parameters of the orbit, but not all, well, the period is obvious, so we can, probably we can about one and the same planet to be sure that we are talking about the same planet, probably er, at least, maybe you corrected me here. yes, in order to fix a transiting planet, it is not enough to see one transit, it is necessary to see three transits in a row, because if we saw one transit, the planet passed well along the disk of the star. we saw another transit does not mean that we know the orbital period, because it could be two different planets. one passed the other passed and these are the mistakes. they were in the history of exoplanet research, when two different planets were mistaken for nu. and finally, when you're expecting a third transit at three, if it happened, then yes, the planet is discovered, at least a transit candidate is open in order to make sure that this is really a planet we need to measure its mass, because , uh, hot jupiterse the same the same size as brown dwarfs. these are objects that are lighter than stars, but heavier than planets , an intermediate type of objects and also low -mass stars also have the same size, so how can we find out what is not. well, nothing speeds, we measure the mass by the transit method. we measure the radius. we know the average density. we know what kind of object in front of us is a planet or a brown dwarf. or even a low-massive star, it happens like this. what percentage, uh, of all , let's say, of exoplanet candidates that are now known by two methods , has been studied reliably successfully. how often we are so lucky with both methods not too often eh. well, let's say, i think that 10-15 percent of all planets have been studied by two methods. and as a rule, this is first, uh, they find a transit candidate, that is, they find a transit planet, then measure its mass, sometimes it happened very rarely, on the contrary. the planet was discovered by the method of radial vel