the justice program of san francisco criminal justice sharing hub. the small, but mighty team has facilitated operations for two decades by enabling data sharing between the court, sheriff, and public defender. every single process and the criminal justice system from arrest to booking to charging to adjudicating, to sentencing to supervision relies in part or in full on justice. when they can, the justice team has only helped to realize policy initiatives. they assisted in automating a paper-based deal assessment transforming the assessment into a mobile application and providing a tool for first responders to keep domestic survivors safe. the justice roadmap process has been very productive and we have a really great plan. the district attorney's office is fully committed to supporting this effort. we look forward to more information about the governance going forward and more transparency about the budget. we are now at a critical moment at which we can elevate the work of justice to fully realize its potential to provide the foundation to the cri

we honor justice kennedy. we celebrate civic education and we unite around our shared commitment around the u.s. constitution. [applause] >> the national constitution center has been honored by an extraordinarily distinguished group of chairs and we lost two of them this year, the great jack vogel and president bush. they were followed by president clinton, governor jeb bush and vice president joe biden. and now we are so fortunate that stice nil gorsuch is serving as our new honorary chair. [applause] justice gorsuch is the honorary chair. live coverage expected to start shortly. announcer: live coverage, where former supreme court justice anthony kennedy will receive the liberty metal from justice neil gorsuch, honorary chair of the center. this was established in 1988 to commemorate the bicentennial of the united states onstitution. >> join me welcoming justice gorsuch. [applause] our commitment to keystones of democratic self-government. teach the young and old about our constitution and about the alues an

justice -- junior justice's job. fun, you have a sense of responsibility, so when everyone else leaves the conference room and goes to eat lunch, the junior justice stays behind and the administrative inff poor in and you -- pour and deliver the news. the second role, because there are only the nine justices in it turns oute room that sometimes people have to bring us stuff. some of us are forgetful. theyforget their coffee, have not taken the right file, they have not taken the right book. there is a phone in the conference room and you can call back to your chambers and say, my glasses, coffee, or book. and somebody will come to the conference room and knock on the door. knock on the outer door, because the conference room is this inner sanctum, holy of holies. it has one door that you open for the inside and it just faces another door two feet away. and then some he has to open that door from the outside. when somebody knocks on that door, he would think that the person would say who forgot their coffee? would get

i think justice stevens and justice souter. what about roberts? >> i don't think there's another justicthere isanother justice ie as a close pal of his. i think that he is friendly with many come he is friendly with all of them. i think that he felt a certain closeness with justice scalia and protectors of their background being similar in the justice scalia was a generation ahead of him. and i think that they are trying to become more of a partner to work on things together, and i have to say his background is also similar to brett kavanaugh. they knew each other from social activities in the chevy chase maryland and dc area, belonged to the same club, played poker at times, so there is a bit of a fellowship there. >> but does he like beer. [laughter] i couldn't resist. i'm sorry. i'm sorry. [laughter] it's been a long day. there was a fire alarm. [laughter] if you had to pick some adjectives to describe john roberts to somebody who doesn't watch the court or go to oral arguments, how would you describe that? >> determined, focused, smart, strate

i justice o'connor, she was justice ginsburg.it happened not just to those that showed up but even the solicitor general they wished there was a trap door under the seat. [laughter] but nowadays, we are one third of the then she did over the bench because of my seniority on one side and the justice on the other. people that have the argument that the court know that my two sisters-in-law are not shrinking violets. they are very active in the colloquy that goes on. in fact i think for some it was a rivalry between justice scalia and justice who could ask for most questions.k you justice gi. [applause] [cheers and applause] >> thank you. thank you very much. [cheers and applause]

justice breyer was the junior justice for 11 years. >> is a junior justice >>, >> justice? it is a hierarchical institution. in some ways, not in other ways. we all have the same vote. the chief justices vote doesn't count for any more than my vote. in other ways, it's a hierarchical institution. the junior justice in particular i don't know how to say this. gets hazed by everybody else. there are three things the junior justice does. one of them is semi serious. the junior justice, when we go into the copper trim and discuss cases, it is just the nine of us. we don't discuss somebody has to take good notes. when we come out of the room, we will be able to tell everybody else what it is we have decided and they can issue the appropriate orders and things like that. that's the junior justice job. that is sort of fun, actually. >> i do that in faculty meetings. >> it's a responsibility. when everybody else leaves the conference room and goes to eat lunch, the junior justice stays behind. all the ministry of staff of the court pours and and you deliver the news of what we have

justice. between 1994-2002 he voted against the government in nearly three-quarters of the free-speech cases, far more than any other justice. justice kennedy's commitment to free speech is powerfully displayed in his concurring opinion in texas v. johnson, the flagburning case. 1989 by a 5-4 decision the coats -- court struck down texel of the prohibited protest from burning the american flag. justice kennedy said it is poignant but fundamental that the flag protects those who hold it in contempt. why did justice kennedy believe that that flag, majestic flag flying over us now, protects those who hold it in contempt? because it is profound commitment to freedom of conscience, limited government, respect for the individual and tolerance of diverse viewpoints. that leads to justice kennedy's third significant contribution to american jurisprudence and american life. his insistence on equal liberty and dignity for all individuals. although justice kennedy believes that cultivating our faculties

justice breyer was a junior justice for 11 years. what is a junior justice? a hierarchy kind of and some was. [laughter] not in other ways. we have the same boat. the chief justice's vote does not count for more than mine. hierarchal institution. particularjustice in -- i don't know how to say this but gets hazed by everyone else. [laughter] there are three things they do. one is semi serious. when we go into the conference room and discuss cases, it is just the nine of us. we do not take clerks, no members of administration. somebody has to take notes so when we come out of the room we will be able to tell everybody what it is we have decided. they can issue the appropriate orders and things like that. that is the junior justice's job. that is sort of fun. >> you said that in faculty meetings. >> you have responsibility and it gives you -- when everybody else leaves the conference room and go steal lunch, the junior justice stays behind in the administrative staff pour in and you deliver the news. that is the serious role. role is because there are only nine

justice gorsuch: justice kennedy. yeah. young people, we have a bunch of them in the audience, pick your mentors carefully. i used to teach ethics and one fact that struck me is that you will pattern your professionalism, your ethics on your first bosses. so pick them carefully. you have to find a job, i know. they choose you, but you choose them, too. be careful who you choose. i was very blessed to have justice kennedy as one of my first mentors. kid couldn't be luckier. here's who justice kennedy is to me. it's the first time a justice and his law clerk had wound up sitting together. i got that for a year. that was really neat. and when i wrote my very first opinion for the supreme court in the united states in a nonvery tonot very important case, be honest, the new guy doesn't usually get anything but a 9-0. i circulated it probably late in the day, 5:00, 6:00, and the justice had gone home. he works from home late, but he likes to work from home. and he found out that i had circulated my opinion and he knew because of

including justice ginsburg residences about justice giglio.nd everyone i think knows about the unlikely friendship between the two. and you are feeling justice dileo was a real treat for the book. and we interviewed him for the biography but parts of that interview are in my own words. and as justice glia and skinned are so different and summing ways. going into his chambers, is very different. kindreds tumors are live very modern art. dozens or hundreds of pictures pictures of friend friends and families colleagues. going into scoliosis chambers dark and leathery, a big dead animal looking down. [laughter]. so as i sat there interviewing justice glia, i watched how he went from the kind of tough person we know in the face just softened enlightened up as he talked about his good friend. he told several stories. one was when they traveled to india together. they went to visit the taj mahal. and justice glia described how he watched justice ginsburg listened to the tour guide describe the love story behind the building in the taj mahal. and he s

were close, justice stevens and justice souter were close. what about roberts? >> i don't think there's another justice i would describe as a close powell of his. he is friendly with all of them. i think he felt, i think he felt a certain close this for justice scalia because of their background that were similar even though justice scalia was a generation ahead of him. alayna kagan is trying to become a partner to work on things together and that ground is similar to brett kavanaugh. they knew each other from social activities in the chevy chase maryland dc area, belong to the same club so there is something their too. >> they both like beer. i couldn't resist. that was a cheap shot. i am sorry. it was a long day, there was a fire alarm. >> if you had to pick some adjectives to describe john roberts to somebody, how would you describe it? >> determined, focused, smart, strategizing, controlling, very controlling, very aware, devoted, always prepared, always prepared, and excellent oral advocate and he shows up at the bench always prepared fo

department of justice. he was appointed to the united states court of appeals, 10th circuit in 2006, he served on the standing committee on rules and practice and procedure of the u.s. judicial conference and chairman of the advisory committee on rules of appellate procedure. he taught at the university of colorado law school and president john jay trump -- president donald j. trump nominated him to the supreme court and he took his seat. please welcome the honorable justicesuch, associate of the supreme court of the united states. [applause] >> thank you. [applause] >> it is wonderful to have you back. you were here test after you -- just after you were seated. it is nice to have you back with us. >> it is always nice to be here. it is a wonderful place. i encourage all young people especially to visit. it is across the mall from the air and space museum. [laughter] it is not that far. if you are really lucky, i know out get to spend camping night with the constitution. how cool is that? thank you for doin

what i do not like is do not see justice. you do not allow evidence to be put into a case, so how is that justice? guest: one thing i wanted to -- and there were a lot of issues there, but thank you again for your call. she mentioned that she spent a week in juvie. certainly any of us, if we were exposed to that type of environment for a week, it could be a wake-up call. unfortunately, in this country, we have so many unduly harsh penalties. that, instead of spending a week, you have individuals like alice marie johnson, who was convicted of a first time, nonviolent drug offense, who ended up spending almost 22 years in prison, and it was only because of the president's actions that she is now free. think about that. two decades in prison for a first time nonviolent drug offense. i have spent considerable time with alice marie johnson -- she is a much better person than i am. just a truly remarkable individual. i just thought to myself, what a tragedy it is that we have so money people, just like her, who are still buried ali

i like the idea of calling it criminal justice reform. it criminal justice reform.irst step is good because it allows a second step at a third step. that is ok. [applause] act provedfirst step we can achieve amazing breakthroughs when we come together as a nation and put the interests of our citizens before the interests of any political party. since we pass this legislation, 10 states have followed our lead. and pass legislation that takes steps to advance criminal justice reform at the state level. we gave it a beautiful steppingstone and some states have come and taken it to a level that we can be proud of. it is only because of what we did that they were able to do it legally and many other ways. congratulations to all the leaders here today from florida, louisiana, mississippi, missouri, michigan, nevada, oklahoma, oregon, and tennessee. congratulations. a great job. host: those were comments he made at hbc you in south carolina. how does the first step act deal with racial disparities? is that something it addresses? guest: i want to be honest about the racial

supreme court justice neil gorsuch.e discusses the judicial branch " a republic,ok if you can keep it." this is just over one hour. >> good evening. welcome to the theater here at the national archives. i am the archivist of the united states. i am pleased you could join us for tonight's program. whether you are here in the theater or joining us via facebook or youtube. a special welcome to our c-span audience this evening. tomorrow is constitution day. in 1787ating that day with the delegates of the constitutional convention signed the document establishing a new government for the united states of america. at the national archives we have celebrated constitution day since 1956. four years after installing the original parchment document in its place of honor in the rotunda. over the decades we have celebrated the constitution in many ways. tomorrow we host one of my favorite events -- naturalization ceremony for new citizens. always a moving experience to witness people from all parts of the world stand in front of th

and justice kagan. justice kagan was questioning the attorney for nfib. justice kagan asked, do you think a person who is subject to the mandate, but not subject to the penalty would have standing? he responded yes, i think that person would, because that person is injured by compliance with the mandate. justice kagan asks, what would that look like? what would the argument be as to what the injury was? he replied, the injury, when that person is subject to the mandate, that person is required to purchase health insurance that is a forced acquisition of an unwanted good. it is a classic pocketbook injury. judge elrod: council, what do you say to those who might say , well, they argue that the court did not actually make a standing? it would be considered a drive-by standing. some people use that colloquial term. so, what would you say to that? while there might be questions on a topic, it does not mean we have answered a question a certain way. mr. henke: we cannot say that the supreme court nfib did pr

justice. david and hope you're taking notes. [laughter] the resist lineage, today's supreme court reflects the reagan legacy. there was no secret what president reagan wanted that legacy to be. america's courts he said quote should interpret the law not make it. the role of the supreme court in his view was to quote to make sure that principles of law are based on the constitution. justice's new book it was practically a user's manual to the faithful interpretation of our constitution. it's also a wake-up call to what we might wrist if we stray too far from the constitutional principles. the title of justices book is a republic, if you can keep it. that phrase is how benjamin franklin is said to have answered citizens questions about what type of government the founders had created at the constitutional convention with his response franco was trying to convey just how fragile our constitutional liberties are. and how vigilant our citizens must be to preserve them. as the same caution that pres

even delayed justice is better than no justice at all. and perhaps that is more important now than ever to show the rest of the world that war criminals have no place you want - - living on us soil and they question why are you going after them? leave them alone. they are little old man barry white would say if years later we found one of the terrorist that blew up pan am one oh three would we say 30 years has passe passed. let's let them go? of course not so why should it be any different for perpetrators of war crimes in the holocaust? so they really were doing this in the name of justice and successfully the justice department was able to prosecute more of these men 1990 on than any other country in the world including germany. as they continue to do their work although the unit now has expanded to include other parts of the world like bosnia and other war-torn countries. unfortunately they are as busy as ever. so for me as a writer, i was really moved and inspired by the men and women. but this was a different kind of story that even

the mayor's criminal justice council. that department doesn't exist today. we need a champion to deal with the policy. we need like -- the reason i transferred it to the department of technology, because we have technology problems and solutions and data sharing that we need to focus on. the policy aspect of it is what we're trying to avoid there. that's what we need to focus a bit on. >> supervisor yee: and i think, supervisor stefani, why i keep on bringing this issue of governance up is about basically the yeses you're asking. what are the policies and, you know, it's something that we should not avoid, otherwise this -- what are we sharing it for. so appreciate your line of questioning. supervisor walton. >> supervisor walton: thank you, presidentie. -- president yee. just a question. is the department of police accountability a part of -- >> clerk: you will need to come up here. >> don't be shy. >> called it exactly, supervisor. i think that's what i'm known for, is my shyness. [laughter] we're just having conversati

they consider it justice and that even delay justice is better than no justice atall . and that is perhaps more important now than ever, to show the rest of the world that this kind of war criminals have no place living on us soil and every time the people inside the justice department were questioned why are you going after the guys? it's been years, leave hethem alone, there old man, barry white would say if years later we found one of the terrorists who blew up pan am 103 , when we say well, years has passed. let's just let him go. of course we wouldn't. so why should it be any different perpetrators of war crimes in the holocaust t? why should it be any different. so they reallywere doing this in the name of justice and they did it most successfully . the justice department, they were able to profit ymore of these men from 1990 on and any other country in the world . including germany. and to this day they continue to do their work although the unit had expanded now to include war criminals from other parts of the world, guatemala and bosnia and other war-torn count

and even delayed justice is better than no justice at all.and that is perhaps more important now than ever to show the rest of the world that this -- the war criminals have no place living on u.s. soil and every time the people inside the justice department were questioned why are you going after these guys? it. >> years could leave them alone. they are little man. gary white would say if years later we found one of the terrorists who up pan am 103 would we say well 30 years has passed. let's just let him go. of course we wouldn't so why would it be any different for perpetrators of war crimes in the holocaust? why should it be any different? and so they really were doing this in the name of justice and they did it successfully for the justice department were able to prosecute more of these men from 1990 on than any other country in the world including germany through to this day they continue to do their work although the unit has expanded now to include war criminals from other parts of the world. they looked at her whole family filling the

chief justice. of course,over ifnm the governm continues to believe and if respondent continues to believe there would be a bivins remedy if sergio hernandez had been standing on american soil it's not clear to me why the same concerns wouldn't be equally present, that is to say by that logic anytime a u.s. officer dea harms any foreign national evena if bivins itself, if bivins had been a foreign national it's not hard too imagine similar diplomatic correspondents following from that incident. >> they argue it'sdiplom not me the foreign policy implicationse of the chiefrely justice identi but thaticatio border security national security in some respects and that that's a different context, slightly ons different than the foreign relations. can you address that?>> is an >> absolutely. we certainly agree that border security as a policy is an important policy of the united if we were here challenging one of the government's border patrol policies this would be a different case, but i think it's impor

we saw justice thomas was always going to be a conservative justice but i think the experience of thatnfirmation hearing for him really embittered him and really drove him very much into conservative corner. justice kavanaugh has told friends that without necessarily mentioning that episode that he's very mindful of the desire to be the same kind of justice that he would have been had none of this happened and he is a different kind of person then justice thomas. he enjoyed teaching at harvard law school. he enjoyed going to yale law school and justice thomas never wanted to have anything to do with yale law school. keep putting 10 cents sticker famously on his yell law school diploma. i think judge kavanaugh would very much like some day go it's going to be difficult to be welcomed back into the establishment and to be if not admired at least more accepted than he is in some corners now. i think the likelihood is more that this experience could lead him in some circumstances to find ways to ingratiate himself through some of his friends mitch and this to me. they may not be the most d

chief justice. let me start with the last question asked and the question given by counsel and i would refer the court starting at page 8 and paragraph 59 which is the second amended complaint which is the current complaint at issue where the complaint continues to allege that it works hand in glove with the federal government to excaught this race's conspiracy and i would refer the court to paragraph 62, 64 and 65 which are in the pages following in which the current complaint goes on to allege that we paid off the signatories to the memorandum of understanding. it doesn't name them by name, and those were incorporated by reference and the court took judicial notice and obviously the signatories are named and they were the naacp and the urban league and al sharpton off the oldest organization in court and in the country to give us cover. the complaint goes on in paragraph 73 what to say that, we have a minority own network that are run by magic johnson and some homes which are some sort of artists

so the people inside the justice department don't consider it revenge. the considerate justice. and that even the delayed justice is better than no justice at all and that is perhaps more important now than ever to show the rest of the world that this kind for that we war criminals have no place o leaving in u.s. soil and then every time the people inside the justice department will question, why are you going after guys. his many a years. leave them alone. thee elopement. very white would see, years later, if we found one of the terrorists who blow up pan am one oh three, when we see well, 30 years has passed, let's just let them go. of course with it. so why should be any different for perpetrators of war crimes in the holocaust. why should it beau any differen. and so they really will doing this in the name of justice in the did it successfully. justice department was able to prosecute more this man from 1991 and any other country in the world. including germany. and to this day they continue to do thehe work although the unit has expanded out to include war criminals from ot

and that's not only a criminal justice issue, it's an economic justice issue. so, i've been working to get rid of the money bail system. but there is on much about the system -- we talked about the for-profit detention facilities. that includes for-profit prisons, which we need to shut down. again, profit motive. the motivation there is not to run programs that are about helping people get out early. meaning helping them get back on their feet. you're making money by having people in your jail. those are some of the ways about what i think we need to do to reform this system. thank you. thank you. >> louise? >> actually one question but points to two very different issues. i hope this news report was accurate, but over the weekend, i read that in addition to the wall that mr. trump is trying to build with our tax dollars, there is a private corporation building a separate wall in a flood plane that our law will not permit but somehow that's happening in our system. so, the question is two-fold. what will you do to ensure a more sustainable future in america and

you for coming we are here today to announce charges against fresh national of the department of justice alleges is responsible for two of the worst computer hacking and bank fraud schemes of the past decade the charges we're announcing today are allegations each defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law maxine from russia has been indicted in pittsburgh pennsylvania for his role as the leader of the cybercriminal gang responsible for distribution of a malware package that was designed to automate confidential personal and financial information such as online banking credentials with infected computers later versions were designed with the added function to assist installation of ransomware over the past decade the malware facilitated millions of dollars from victim summing some occurring as recently as may of this year as second co-conspirator igor was also indicted and can - - in conjunction with the scheme also is in lincoln nebraska for his participation to disseminate zeus a similar form of malware used empty out the financial acc

that could provide justice and should provide justice for the rogue injured people who've been holding the brutalized this has to be the beginning not the end and really you know this case itself could bring about some important measures to protect the 600000 injured who are still risk of atrocities from the me and the military in russia kind of a living and a regime that that's the 1st and immediate consequence potentially of this case but it could and should also. stage them the u.n. security council into further action you know this needs to be taken out by the international criminal court by the by the security council they need to impose universal law and involve targeted sanctions against those in the military who are responsible for these atrocities that is nice in the beginning to tyson and this case is a really important part of that. you mentioned what's at stake for the rohingya here david they have said that they are seeking justice but what kind of actual justice could they get from this case. well as i said this is a this is one of the stage and needs to be multiple diffe

clerks justice. it's funny how that seems now. so, justice many of these old dogs do you recognize. i thought about it and candidly i answered i could probably identify just about half of them and then he said something that shocked me. he said me too. [laughter] and then he said something that kind of depressed me at the time. he said and that's the way it should be. that's what's going to happen to me too. as a sum of colorado i thought that was terrible and unbelievable. this guy was not only a star nfl player road scholar but a war hero, south pacific. he was one of jack kennedy's best friends. hhe told the segregated southern schools with bobby kennedy, served on the supreme court for 31 years. how could anybody forget justice white. i walked through those hallways now. a lot of tourists staring at the portrait with no idea who they are looking at and i think what he was telling me i now know it was joyful, not depressing. the judge's role is a quiet one, supporting the constitution, not changin

department personnel and say, that they did blind justice?there is not a chance, right. so that was my idea, and i think over time i got away from it, and the reason, i didn't get completely away from it, but it just turned out to be, the hardest thing for a writer about something like this is to try to write something about a story that isn't over yet, it is all a moving target, you don't know if you plant your feet you say this is what happened, you find out three weeks after the book comes out or three hours before the book comes out and rush isn't there to help you, you find out you're wrong about something. i have been wrong about enough, if i haven't been clear enough about that. so the challenge here i think became to try to break off a piece of this, that it was sensible to treat, that you could, you could explain what really happened, that it was important enough to rate writing a book about. i think the collusion narrative fits all of that. what i hope people take away from the book, is a couple of things, number one, the collusion

justice. a little bit of detail about the malware deployed. both forms of the malware intercept passwords and other private information used to conduct wire transfers. the malware that initiates wire transfers from foreign bank accounts controlled by the criminals. areuse many of the victims small and midsize businesses, their accounts typically do not have the same legal protections afforded to consumer accounts. they did not discriminate in their choice of targets. allegeska complaint yakubets was involved in a theft from franciscan sisters. he devised and implemented the kind of criminal scheme so audacious and sophisticated they would be difficult to imagine if they were not real. sitting quietly at good sumer -- a computer terminals far away, these cyber criminals stole tens of millions of dollars from unwitting members of our business, nonprofit, governmental, and religious communities. each of these was a cyber enabled bank robbery. we take crimes like this extremely seriously and will

department of justice. and he is doing so at this incredibly fraught time when, you know, the lens of history is going to focus the heat and the light here both pretty intensely. impeachment proceedings against the president are well underway. right. as we speak tonight, members of the intelligence committee have been, we believe, invited of committee working space, so they can individually start reviewing the report on the impeachment investigation into president trump. committee members, we believe, are allowed to review the draft of the report as of this evening, in that secure facility. tomorrow evening, the intelligence committee is due to vote on whether the impeachment report should be conveyed to the judiciary committee to start the process of weighing actual articles of impeachment against president trump on the basis of that evidence. it is possible that we the public may get access to the impeachment report as soon as tomorrow night, although that is not yet totally clear. i will tell you, the ch

i mean it's literally the statue is lady justice is blind. the idea is it doesn't matter if you're rich or pour or republican or in the, man, woman, african-american or white whatever -- you should go the same basic standards and so in a bock ask i say -- all this is how i each any law student on day one everybody has biases if you like a korpg pretend that parties retired and think about it from the other side. and so with this -- i think any impeachment and i felt this was true in clinton as well while i was inned administration you think about -- if the shoe were on other foot if in this for ukraine if the president was obama and did all of this. how would you feel? if he tried to go to cheat on his reelection campaign by going and getting information from another government? and now ting that question has to be asked and i'm sure we'll get into this later but particularly house report today with other 100 pages detailing the obstruction that -- that trump has engaminged in. you know how would you feel if a president clinton, obama, elizab

this is my justice department betraying us.e's an element of -- or at least there's a claim this is congressional oversight and we had to do it. i have been a part of both of these institutions for a long time, and i know what it looks like when the department is trying to protect people and protect information. and i know what it looks like when they're not. there were plenty of ways to fulfill their congressionally mandated oversight responsibility without politicizing our messages, without shoveling them out in the way that they did. >> why do you think they did it? >> well, my speculation is because this was not a great time for the justice department. you had attorney general sessions constantly beleaguered and being lambasted by the president for failing to sufficiently protect him. you had rod rosenstein going to the hill early the next morning. i think it served a useful foil. >> one of the things that's happened over the course of these past couple of years is that you've been sort of the apogee point in terms of the w

the department of justice, we are charged with enforcing the laws of the united states and seeking justice but our calling is to protect our fellow citizens and our friends and neighbors. the first western pennsylvania victim was sharon, pennsylvania, a small steel town. i had family members who graduated from there. we know that for every dollar stolen from a school district that is one less dollar they have for the high school football team, the girls basketball team, one less dollar for teacher salaries or special education. for every dollar stolen from an individual is one less dollar they have for their retirement. one less dollar they have for their children's education or family vacation. for every dollar stolen from a company that is one less dollar to innovate, create new products, enter new markets or to hire the same friends and neighbors and this is why we go to the ends of the earth, to investigate and prosecute cybercriminals. these are the cybercriminals who victimize our citizens and we will pursue them and prosecute them whether these couples are in pittsburgh, pennsylvani

i mean, this is the justice department's own employees. and the justice department is posedly in the middle of an investigation into whether these text messages or anything else implicated any wrongdoing. in the middle of that ongoing investigation without any finding whether there had been any wrongdoing here, the justice department spokesperson invited reporters to come to the justice department to look at them. the justice department just shoveled these textags of thaner employees without permission which is ultimately how lisa page came not to be not just on the list of people the president wants tried and convicted for treason, but also the one he calls over and over peter struck's lovely fbi lover. he mocks her at campaign rallies in graphic language and occasionally to graphic noises to the delight of fox news. watch, trump mockingly imitates struck and page at the rally. wait until you get to the part he starts grunting. that's one way to counter program your own impeachment. attack and threaten and try to humiliate anyone involved

justice. a little bit of detail about the mallard employed by yucca veg in his co-conspirators. both forms of the malware intercepts passwords and other private information that can be used to conduct wire transfers. the malware then initiates a or read rex wire transfers from victim bank accounts to foreign bank accounts controlled by the criminals. because many of the victims of both boo gods and zeus are small and midsize businesses, their accounts typically do not have the same protections afforded to consumer accounts. so some of the losses involved over particularly devastating. iacovelli and his co-conspirators did not discriminate either on their choice of targets. for example the nebraska complaint alleges directly involved in tens of thousands of dollars from religious order of franciscan sisters. yucca veg and members of his criminal network devised and implemented the kinds of criminal's game so audacious and sophisticated that it would be difficult to imagine if they were not real

justice department has found no evidence of political bias by the f.b.i. when it investigated contacts between donald trump's presidential campaign and russia. 26 scene. people living in eastern australia have been forced to leave their homes as bushfires continue to spread around 85 of them are currently burning in the state of new south wales half of those are uncontained conditions are expected to worsen on tuesday because of high temperatures and strong winds in the country's biggest city sydney's once again being closed in fic smoke from the nearby fires andrew thomas is in the middle of it. the people behind me have chosen this spot for their wedding because ordinarily it has one of the most iconic views in sydney the harbor bridge and the opera house both completely hidden by the smoke here that horn that's a ship in the harbor and the captain he or she is going to blow their horn to warn other boats that they're coming this is becoming the new normal in sydney this dense smoke it intensely does very day and this is particularly bad but people are w

the international court of justice. sitting in the audience having to hear the story. of.people and. she spoke what i thought was most remarkable about today was not what she didn't say and she did not use. the context of the atrocities. perpetrated this is. someone who did not think that genocide transpired. were identifies those people. as a group why do you think. showed up today. that it wasn't required that she make an appearance what kind of statement do you think that made her presence there . well i think it's in some ways it's a good thing that she showed up in the sense that it gives a degree of credibility to the process it's important to me and mar it and say we don't want this to happen we're not even going to show up she showed up as a former human rights icon now as many people you are as a kind of a flag bearer for atrocity against against the regime i think it sends a message that they're taking it very seriously and they very much would like to avoid a situation where the justice. of the country has perpetrated genocide against through against. people but