next, we hear from justin buchler, political science professor at case western university about his research on competitive elections. >> i started thinking about competitive elections long ago, and i started the project thinking that i was writing as the dell's advocate. -- the devil's advocate. i saw people assume without question that competitive elections are intrinsically good and healthy. and i thought it was important to have somebody make the argument in the other direction. so i started the project from the mindset of playing devil's advocate. and as i kept working on the project, i realized i had an easier time constructing arguments against competitive elections than for them. when we say a competitive election, that can mean a lot of different things. it can mean elections in which there are as many as candidates on the ballot as possible. it can mean a an election in which we are uncertain about the outcome. it can mean an election in which there are low barriers to entry. there are a lot of different meanings of competition. and one of the problems, one of the problems with say