i don't know what the dictionary examples that justin kagan referred to work, but i bet the used happen full of by an infinitive, and i think we still use it that way. >> and armor of them exactly. i just remember laughing at them. >> they were 1483. in 1490 something. and then asterisk that said obsolete. i couldn't figure out what they were talking about. >> in addition, there is not just the word happen. it's preceded by three other words. deal the purpose that those words serve is to constrain the universe of vacancies that are eligible for a recess appointment. >> the constitution as a first was has now been amended. it uses the word vacancy as the cause we are discussing here. this happens by -- the governor can make the appointment. he certainly wouldn't be that could happen over three days. >> it is even better than that. at the time of the framing, the governor tried to appoint somebody to the senate pursuant to that clause. during the legislative session. the senators refused to seat that individual. that further supports our position. >> the language on the happen, but the pr

the dictionaryat examples that justin kagan i bet theo work, but used happen full of by an infinitive, and i think we still use it that way. >> and armor of them exactly. i just remember laughing at them. they were 1483. in 1490 something. and then asterisk that said obsolete. i couldn't figure out what they were talking about. , there is not just the word happen. it's preceded by three other words. deal the purpose that those words serve is to constrain the universe of vacancies that are eligible for a recess appointment. >> the constitution as a first was has now been amended. it uses the word vacancy as the cause we are discussing here. by -- the governor can make the appointment. he certainly wouldn't be that could happen over three days. >> it is even better than that. at the time of the framing, the governor tried to appoint somebody to the senate pursuant to that clause. during the legislative session. the senators refused to seat that individual. that further supports our position. the language on the happen, but the practice -- and in heticular practicalities -- can make a re

lot, use of cause and to explain not only what we think statute requires in this regard and why justin kagan, it would neither be silly nor dom or justice sotomayor crazy to read the statute as we suggest. we begin with the text of the statute which authorizes prohibition only of amounts which attribute is significantly to maintenance in downwind locations. the focus of the language we think is quite clearly on the effect of state's emissions on other states and not on the cost of reducing them. but e.p.a. has done it assert it has power to increase state' reduction obligations beyond what a focus on the effects of its missions would require, simply because e.p.a. has decideed that it would be reasonably affordable for that state to bear a higher burden. what that means is that states here, which are making only a slight contribution to air quality problems in down wind states are nonetheless required to make very substantial reductions, in many cases far more, in cases with states making far greater contributions to poor air quality in the same downwind locations. there's no relationship at

justin ruth bader ginsburg. good to see you. we saw the chief justice john roberts walk by just a few minutes ago. here is stephen breyer and elena kaganalking by. they tend to not react, stand up and applaud and cheer. in fact, justice antonin scalia has voiced concern about going to these speeches in the past because he says it feels more like a pep rally. >> it makes what i'm about to describe even more surreal and bizarre. who i'm looking at right now is willie robertson. one of the stars of "duck dynasty." and he is here as a guest. >> i'm sorry to interrupt. you're discussion one of the stars of "duck dynasty" but do i have the vice president and the senate majority leader harry reid. vice president biden, good to see you. leader reid, how are you? good to see you, sir. mr. durbin, how are you doing? good to see you. mr. bennett. we have all the senators coming in now. now you know we're getting serious. supreme court justices, members of the senate. things are getting serious here. dana, i'm sorry, you were talking about one of the stars of "duck dynasty". >> i'm emphasizing this not because i think it's necessarily important bu