>> that's right. >> and kohler hoped he'd raised sufficient doubt as he rested his case.st one score card, it looked as though the defense had a good shot. >> as you went into closing arguments, what was the betting in the courtroom about guilty or not guilty? >> it was probably about 30/70, in favor of not guilty. >> in favor of not guilty? >> yeah. >> reporter amber hunt of the "detroit free press" had heard a totally circumstantial case. there was no body, and ream's past as a pedophile had been excluded. >> it was not a slam dunk case by any means. >> but before the lawyers had the opportunity to give closing arguments, something extraordinary was about to happen in judge's chambers, a hush-hush meeting that could blow the case out of the water. >> and i just happened to notice that the judge said nobody can overhear this. and then i put two and two together. >>> coming up -- the defendant offers a deal for information on cindy, but will the chief prosecutor buy it? >> my first inclination was, hell, no. >> when "disappearance at the dairy queen" continues. >>> the vi

the statutory kohler is 2.24%, which is slightly higher than the 1.6% that was proposed in january. however, it is not funded in order to not fund the deficit factor, i.e. what we would actually get funded. the actual revenue that districts would receive has been increased to about -- the deficit has been increased to about 20%. all it translates to is that for every dollar owed to education, we will be receiving 80 cents roughly of that dollar. in addition to not receiving any cola. even for sfusd, we have seen a slight -- less than five percentage -- increased, but we do anticipate receiving a little more funding. the next chart shows you four of the san francisco schools -- unified school district, what the actual 2010-2011 funding was, and that is the blue bar. the orange color bar is the amount that is not funded by the state. similarly in 2011-2012, of the 6486 that our school districts should be receiving, we will only receive 5204. this next chart is also a little interesting. i thought i would throw it in there. it is a comparison that was done by the national education ass

. >> when you think of somalia, you think of 1992, 1993, the deval kÖhler and -- the debacle there andthe reaction by the united states. what is going on now in terms of what the u.s. can or cannot do to try to help people? >> without security, food aid does not get fit through. the number of african union troops that are deployed and the all-out effort that remain to mitigate the threat of a al- shabab, which you know is another close relative of al qaeda, you know, we know there has been local leadership. the kenyans have tried to step up and make a difference. and it certainly the warehousing and particularly in kenya so many refugees shows a good neighbor policy if there ever was one. but what it all comes down to, people sometimes say, why are you americans so worried about good governance and just building of countries? the absence of it leads to other -- better chaos, loss of life, and gain warfare. -- leads to utter chaos, loss of life and the gang warfare. it has been demoralized now with that movie, but if i remember being in congress for 31 years and the secretary of defense