this is a judge of the kabansky district court. oh, yuna voimeeva during the process. she reads out the testimony of a witness . surprisingly, none of those present even does not pay attention to the name of a high-ranking metropolitan policeman. but the fact that vladimir kozadaev could know something a few years ago was said by the parents of the murdered ekaterina patrick, i'm a fool. no , not at home on the street. here the race came in the yard. knocked at the entrance. why didn't he say? she said business, then went in. and what are you, he you go she was? so it was walking, somewhere i didn’t turn on the car and didn’t go for tea, i just came, the driver didn’t give the keys. part wanted to get information firsthand decided to call the officer to answer a few questions. but the police colonel was not too talkative. this is an audio clip of that conversation. quiet. you must give any comments. this is actually, as far as i understand, my personal right. who are you again, i introduced myself to you olga zhurenkova, program vesti duty, right? there is a criminal c

this is a judge of the kabansky district court. oh, yuna vovoyeva during the process.ut the testimony of a witness. surprisingly, none of those present even pays attention to the name of a high-ranking metropolitan policeman. but the fact that vladimir kazadaev could know something a few years ago was said by the parents of the murdered ekaterina pateyuk. yes, you have it at home. no, not at home on the street. here in the yard, razno came in. knocked at the entrance. why didn't he say? she told everyone she contacted him on business, then went in. what do you mean, he told you to go, she was from him so it was walking, somewhere i didn’t turn on the car, i didn’t drive, i came for tea just like that, the driver’s keys got into the police. i wanted to get first-hand information and decided to call the officers to answer a few questions. but the police colonel was not too talkative. this is an audio clip. quiet. you must give some or comments, actually, as far as i understand, a personal right. who are you again olga zhurenkova? the program is in the process of a crimin

march 2022, these shots were taken in the kabansky district court of the republic of buryatia tiny the meeting room barely accommodates everyone from the duty unit of the local police department, dmitry istomin , and the former deputy head of the selenga police department, ekaterina batyuk, yevgeny shikunova, the crime occurred back in 2002 in the town of cranberry. pad inkin and istomin considered themis for several months. and now the long-awaited finale the jury read out the verdict. quite right. the high-profile criminal trial attracted the attention of many federal journalists. and it's no wonder the former law enforcement officers dmitry istomin evgeny inkin in fact the whole country sentenced in absentia, however, as it turned out, the case is extremely confusing in order to understand all the details of the double murder of cranberry pade, our film crew went to buryatia several times, but first things first. an urban-type settlement, selenginsk, in the kabansky district of buryatia, a population of slightly less than 14,000 people, the once empty plain began to be developed onl

march 2022, these shots were taken in the kabansky district court of the republic of buryatia, the tinyroom barely accommodates everyone in the dock, the ex-employee of the duty unit of the local police department dmitry istomin and the former deputy head of the selenga police department yevgeny innkin, the investigation accused them of the murder of two girls. yevgeny shatunova the crime happened back in 2002 in a place called cranberry. pad' themis considered the case of inkin and istomin for several months. and now the long-awaited finale the jury read out the verdict in the commission of this act. no guilty and stuffy assessor. ah. the high-profile criminal trial attracted the attention of many federal journalists. and it is not surprising that the former law enforcement officers dmitry istomin evgeny inkin were essentially sentenced in absentia by the whole country, however, as the case turned out to be extremely, confusing in order to sort out all the details of the double murder of the cranberry pad. our film crew went to buryatia several times, but first things first. an urban-t

this is a judge of the kabansky district court. oh, yuna waryevo during the process. reads the testimony of a witness. surprisingly, none of those present even pays attention to the name of a high-ranking metropolitan policeman. but the fact that vladimir kozadaev could know something a few years ago was said by the parents of the murdered ekaterina ptkyuk. i'm a fool. no, not at home on the street. here the race came in the yard. knocked at the entrance. at least called. why didn't he say? she said she was talking about business, then she came in and said that he was for you to go. she was from him. so they walked. somewhere i didn't turn on the visor, someone didn't go drunk there, just like that, the driver's keys came for tea. not no gave it to the police. the duty department wanted to get first-hand information and decided to call for a few questions. but the police colonel was not too talkative. this is an audio clip. you have to give any comments, in fact, as far as i understand, a personal right. who are you again, i introduced myself to you olga zhurenkova, p

away in the spring of 2020 evgeny inkin and dmitry istomin were arrested, and a year ago the kabansky district courtburyatia acquitted them , relatives and state prosecutions did not agree with this. they appealed the verdict and insisted that the case should be heard in another court and in another region. as a result, it was reviewed in the sovetsky district court, ulan-ude defendants. they did not agree with the decision. you did not expect such a decision from the jury. you yourself insisted that, uh , there should be a jury trial. dmitry istomin's spouse does not believe in her husband's involvement in the crime. i say i do not agree to appeal against the water i agree, because you think you are not guilty, he is still dissatisfied. i believe that they blamed the sister of another defendant. evgenia innkina. he also defends his brother and assures him that he was not at the scene of the murder. we talked with him in general, of course, we talked, the mothers of the murdered students talked. after the process, they try to hold on and not show. outsiders of their emotions the case can be said, a

killed in the spring of 2020 evgeny inkin and dmitry istomin were arrested, and a year ago the kabansky district court acquitted with this, the relatives and the state prosecution did not agree. they appealed the verdict and insisted that the case be heard in another court and in another. the region is far away from the connections of former policemen. as a result, the materials were reviewed in the sovetsky district court. ulan-ude. this time, the jury considered that the guilt of the defendants had been proven. moreover, the decision was unanimous dmitry istomina and yevgeny inna were taken into custody directly taken here to such a decision. they were clearly not ready. dmitry istomin even began to make remarks to the jury and criticize their verdict. judge. i had to interrupt his wrong decision. photos of the graphics and duty of the dedicated vozrozhdenie 123 beats were not provided. you cannot dispute the listing of dmitry istomin's wife marina in her husband's involvement in the crime, does not believe that the victim? i don't want to talk. you are confident in the innocence of a friend. all th

away in the spring of 2020 evgeny inkina dmitry istomin were arrested, and a year ago the kabansky district courtcquitted them , relatives did not agree with this and government. they appealed the verdict and insisted that the case should be heard in another court and in another region. as a result, it was revised in the soviet district court, ulan-ude defendants, they did not agree with the decision. you did not expect such a decision from the jury. they themselves insisted that there should be a jury trial. the spouse of dmitry istomin does not believe in her husband's involvement in the crime. i say i don’t agree, i will appeal i don’t agree, because you don’t think he’s guilty, he still hasn’t been replaced. i believe that they blame the sister of another defendant. evgeniya innkina. he also defends his brother and assures him that he was not at the scene of the murder. we talked with him, we talked in general, of course, we talked, we talked. do you think that there is nothing so sure about the mothers of the murdered students, after the process they try to hold on and not show it. outsiders

killed in the spring of 2020 evgeny inkin and dmitry istomin were arrested, and a year ago kabansky district courtrelatives and state prosecutions did not agree with this. they appealed the verdict and insisted that the case be heard in another court and in another region away from the connections of the former policemen. as a result, the materials were reviewed in the sovetsky district court of ulan-ude, this time the jury considered that the guilt of the defendants had been proven. moreover, the decision was unanimous dmitry istomina and evgeny innkina, they took them into custody directly took them here to such a decision. they were clearly not ready dmitry istomin even began to make remarks to the jury and criticize their verdict. judge. i had to interrupt his wrong decision. photos of the schedule and duty were not provided . a reward of 123 beats was allocated. you cannot dispute that dmitry istomin's wife marina does not believe that the victim was involved in the crime. i don't want to talk. you are sure of the innocence of your friend questions. all this was provided in court, according t

dmitry istomin was arrested, and a year ago the kabansky district court.ed them , relatives did not agree with this. and government charges. they appealed the verdict and insisted that the case be heard in another court and in another region. away from the connection of the former policemen. as a result, the materials were reviewed in the sovetsky district court of ulan-ude. this time , the jury considered that the guilt of the defendants had been proven. moreover, the decision was unanimous dmitry istomin evgeny innkina was taken into custody directly taken here for such a decision, they were clearly not ready dmitry istomin even began to make comments to the jury and criticize their verdict. judge. i had to interrupt his wrong decision. photos of the graphics and duty of the dedicated renaissance 123 beats were not provided, you cannot to challenge and put on the stock exchange dmitry istomin's wife marina does not believe that her husband was involved in the crime, that the victim? i don't want to talk. you are sure of your friend's innocence. all this

kabansky district, buryatia crimes shikunova and katya patrick thought. in samara, the minister of construction of the region nikolai plaksin was arrested, whom he suspects in excess of authority, the oktyabrsky district courtan important official into custody and this was an unpleasant gift for the minister . the arrest coincided with his birthday. plaksin turned 53 years old. nikolai happy birthday, acceleration thank you for wishing, the minister suspects gross violations during the construction of cultural palaces, which took place as part of the national project , according to the investigation, the official forced his subordinates to sign deliberately false acts of acceptance of work performed. plaksins consider him the richest official in the region official income previously exceeded 100 million rubles. in a year, unique details of large-scale special operations of the security forces to detain their own colleagues. in rostov, the head of one of the police departments , the detainee and his colleagues, went under arrest, along with the details of a high-profile case about large-scale extortions from local businessmen, who and how unambiguously hinted to the merchant for payment. obviously, the head