and kaci has arranged to meet her. herenough improvement to keep her safe, so how can we not take that chance? right, i think that's why for us ect was not a hard decision. so many people asked us about when we sentjonah to kennedy krieger when he was nine, and when we ended up getting ect later, wasn't that such a hard, hard decision, and for me, it was, no, it was the only decision. we went into it very enthusiastically because it provided some hope that we would be able to provide something which might actually work, after all these failed attempts. many are far less enthusiastic. this hard—hitting campaign video is made by the citizens commission on human rights, a group founded by the church of scientology, who oppose most psychiatric treatment. some human rights organisations call for a total ban, especially for children. leading the fight against ect is dr peter breggin, who has long campaigned against the psychiatric establishment. after seeing for myself the desperation of sofija's situation, i want to know wh

. >> that of the john mccain with kacie hunt.ant to ask you about that, assuming robust growth of 3%, that the administration is banking on, they say it could eliminate the federal deficit within a decade. is that reasonable and is the cost too great to even shoot for that goal? >> it is totally fraudulent accounting. it is a fake budget. just to give you a point of reference, the republican budget that went through the congress a few months ago assumed 2% growth over a period of time. the trump folks assume 3%. there is no economic projection out there by anybody who talks about that kind of growth, especially when you want to clamp down as the trump administration has on immigration. which helps provide new workers into the workforce. this is a scam when it comes to their deficit claims. i want to be clear, the harm it would do to middle class families and working americans is real, but the claims that it will balance the deficit is totally totally a scamp. that's the only way to put it. >> we appreciate your time, thank you fo

kacie, this is unusual. they said he's never arou. why is donald trump bringing him up in a tweet? have a statement from the house democrats saying they're not at the interviewing phase yet, they're still collecting documents and will start interviews shortly. i think if you talk to anybody here on capitol hill in either party, they feel like carter page has basically been throwing himself at the committees to try to talk to them. it seems like something he's more interested in. he sent a resume or something over there along those lines. it's almost funny when you talk to these members behind the scenes, so i do think it's a little bit of an interesting and remarkable shift. i never got the sense that specifically democrats still want to speak to carter page. there may be some evolving dynamics on the outside, but i don't think this is somebody that these committees feel like it's going to be difficult to get information from if they want it. >> it does make you wonder if carter page has a lawyer advising him. why does he keep going on television and talking about these things? the

and my thought about it is it's a little like safety and edge kacy trials and medication develop ment. do you phase one, safety and healthy individuals. phase two, safety and individuals that are affected. phase three, the randomized clinical trials and if they're positive and encouraging, then you roll it out and you monitor to see what happens out in the real world. a third of the adverse events we hear about, we learn after market, after the fda approved. we do the same with poll sichlt we do our best as you saw to create policy based on the science of what seems like it will work. but when you roll it out in the real world, you don't know what's going to happen. i think it's very important that we keep monitoring in the same way we try to monitor when we rollout a new drug to see if the new policies are having the intended effect or if there something we couldn't anticipate. and then make course corrections as we need to. >> i'm just going to comment on the second question. it's actually not that i'm an exert on insurance but i read a lot about the issue of opioid medications and

through this experience brian learned the i wantry kacies of the legislative process and the inner workings of house operation, skills that would serve him well when in 1995 he was hired as an assistant clerk to the parliamentarian. brian was spend the next 22 years in the house parliamentarian's office and became chief clerk to the parliament tanche in 2009. for over two decades, brian has been a fixture at the house rostrum, dutyfully assisting the presiding officer in time keep, recognizing members on the floor and preparing and reviewing reams of legislative paperwork for the house. brian has prepared the house chambers for visiting dignitaries and state of the union addresses alike and everything in between. if that wasn't enough, brian also created the first computer network for the parliamentarian. an accomplished artist, brian remains active in his artist exendeavors which run the gamut from pencil draws, water colors and oils to photography and architectural design. his retirement will offer new opportunities to continue these pursuits. a devoted orioles fan, it is my hope that bri