that issue because i have concerns and i think the environmental process an we want to do it as quickly as possible to make the determination between kad ek, nag deck and eir, but as you start to point out the position could have too much review and not enough review. we had a couple projects which was 100 percent affordable and within a block of each other and the same wind effect on both projects and no discussion about the affordable project and hours of discussion about the wind effects on the market rate. obviously, i'm not saying, i think we have to -- the impact is the same no matter what's there for those around there, those who are affected by traffic, sidewalks and other things that a project has. i think codifying this is not a place to put it. if you want to fast track affordable housing project do it in other ways. but to try to cut short on the necessary environmental reviews is saying let's do a quickie mr. because it's such a beneficial thing. couple things i wanted to ask for miss rogers. i notice in the memo, i don't want to go into too much detail today but as we move forward and try to make a motion to forward, we said that adding to ei